valuation 2 and 3 demand and welfare theory l.
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Valuation 2 and 3: Demand and welfare theory

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 28

Valuation 2 and 3: Demand and welfare theory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 126 Views
  • Uploaded on

Valuation 2 and 3: Demand and welfare theory. What is so special about environmental goods? Theory of consumer demand for market goods Welfare effects of a price change: Equivalent variation versus compensating variation Consumer demand for environmental goods

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Valuation 2 and 3: Demand and welfare theory' - frey


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
valuation 2 and 3 demand and welfare theory
Valuation 2 and 3: Demand and welfare theory
  • What is so special about environmental goods?
  • Theory of consumer demand for market goods
  • Welfare effects of a price change: Equivalent variation versus compensating variation
  • Consumer demand for environmental goods
  • Welfare effects of a quantity change: Equivalent surplus versus compensating surplus
  • Theory and practise
last week
Last week
  • Price and Value
  • Total Economic Value
  • Why and what to value?
  • Uses of economic valuation
why valuation
Why valuation?
  • We must make choices about how to manage the human impact on natural systems
  • Greater use of a particular environmental service or greater protection of a specific natural system results in less of something else (trade-off)
  • To make the most of scarce resources we must compare what is gained from an activity with what is sacrificed by undertaking that activity
  • Why? To assess the net impact of changes
what is so special about environmental goods and services
What is so special about environmental goods and services?
  • In economics the criterion for assessing the net impacts („benefits“ and „costs“ ) is the well-being of the members of society
  • Well-being is defined as the individuals‘ preferences for goods
  • Preferences are typically represented through demand functions
    • Changes in well-being can be inferred by changes in prices or quantity
  • Problem with environmental goods: no markets exist
    • Individuals have preferences nevertheless
  • Changes in well-being are derived by individuals’
    • max. willingness to pay for gains or (WTP)
    • min. willingness to accept compensation for losses (WTA)
  • Prices and marginal WTP or WTA are equivalent
consumer demand theory market goods
Consumer demand theory: Market goods
  • Consider a consumer who has a utility function
  • This consumer maximises the utility of a bundle of goods x, with prices p, and income M
  • This solves to the ordinary or Marshallian demand function
  • Substituting the expression for xi gives the indirect utility function
    • this gives you the highest level of utility attainable, given prices p and income Y
consumer demand theory 2
Consumer demand theory -2
  • Roy‘s identity relates x and v:
  • That is, the derivative of indirect utility with respect to the ith price yields the ith demand function, after normalising by the marginal utility of income
constructing an ordinary demand function
Constructing an ordinary demand function

x2

p1

I3

I2

I1

x1(p1,p2,y), demand for x1

C

Budget constraint

C

A

A

B

B

x1

x1

consumer demand theory 3
Consumer demand theory -3
  • An alternative to generate a demand curve is to keep utility constant instead of income
  • Here the consumer is assumed to minimize total expenditure to achieve a given level of utility at price level P
  • This solves to the compensated or Hicksian demand function
  • This gives the quantity demanded as a function of price and utility
  • Income is of no consequence; as prices change, expenditures are adjusted to maintain constant utility.
consumer demand theory 4
Consumer demand theory -4
  • Demand for the ith commodity is the derivative of the expenditure function to the price of i
constructing a compensated demand function
Constructing a compensated demand function

x2

p1

I1

hx1(p1,p2,U1), demand for x1

C

C

A

A

B

B

Budget constraint

x1

x1

ordinary and compensated demand
Ordinary and compensated demand
  • We derived ordinary and compensated demand functions
  • Ordinary demand functions bundle income and price effects together
  • Compensated demand function do not have this problem, but look at price effects alone
  • To evaluate the effect of a governmental policy that changes relative prices we want to examine the price effect only
  • Typically, economists estimate ordinary demand functions, as utility cannot be observed
income and price effects
Income and price effects

x2

e/p21

A

Price effect

e/p22

B

Income effect

C

I1

I0

D

M

x1

surplus from ordinary and compensated demand
Surplus from ordinary and compensated demand

p1

If AB is an ordinary demand function like x1(p1,p2,M):

Consumer Surplus= ABCD-BCDE=ABE

A

If AB is a compensated demand function like hx1(p1,p2,U1) the area under the curve correspond to changes in constant utility expenditures

E

B

p*1

D

C

x*1

x1

ordinary and compensated demand 3
Ordinary and compensated demand - 3

p1

hx1(p1,p2,U0)

Compensated demand

hx1(p1,p2,U1)

A

B

x1(p1,p2,M)

Ordinary demand

x1

ordinary and compensated demand 4
Ordinary and compensated demand - 4
  • Properties of both demand functions are related
  • We observe ordinary demand functions, but we are interested in compensated demand functions – the latter can be derived from the former if agents are rational, and even then it involves many steps including integration
welfare effects of price changes
Welfare effects of price changes
  • Consider price fall P*  P#
  • Willingness to pay (WTP) to secure price fall is known as compensating variation (CV)
  • Willingness to accept compensation (WTAC) to forego price fall is known as equivalent variation
  • There are gains and loss, so four measures (EV)
    • Price decreases
      • WTP to secure a gain (CV)
      • WTAC to forego a gain (EV)
    • Price increases
      • WTP to prevent a loss (EV)
      • WTAC to tolerate a loss (CV)
welfare measures
Welfare measures
  • Compensating variation is the quantity of income that compensates consumers for a price change, that is, returns them to their original welfare
  • Equivalent variation is an income change that yields the same utility change as the price change
  • Both terms can be defined using the expenditure function
ordinary and compensated demand welfare effects
Ordinary and compensated demand: Welfare effects

p1

Compensated variation: ABEG

Consumer Surplus: AEFB

Equivilent variation: ADFB

=> If p decreases CV<DCS<EV

hx1(p1,p2,U0)

Compensated demand

hx1(p1,p2,U1)

E

A

D

p01

F

p11

x1(p1,p2,M)

B

G

Ordinary demand

x01

x11

x1

consumer demand theory environmental goods
Consumer demand theory: Environmental goods
  • Often demand for environmental commodities is only indirectly observed
  • People change their behaviour in response to changes in the environment, but do not purchase environmental quality directly
  • We‘ll repeat the analysis above, but now assume that only n-1 goods are directly traded; the nth good (named q) is the environmental commodity of interest
restricted demand
Restricted demand
  • The environmental good q affects individuals utility
  • This consumer maximises the utility of a bundle of goods X, with prices P, and income M
  • This leads to restricted ordinary demand functions
  • and a restricted indirect utility
  • Again, Roy‘s identity relates x and v
restricted demand 2
Restricted demand - 2
  • The dual of the problem: Minimising expenditure
  • This leads to the expenditure function function
  • The Hicks-compensated demand function for changes in prices is
  • The Hicks-compensated inverse demand (marginal WTP) for changes in q is
  • Rearranging the equation yields the compensating demand for q
restricted demand 3
Restricted demand - 3
  • But...
  • we can determine how expenditures change with q for some price of good x and implicitly defining a demand function for q only if we assume weak complementarity
  • That is, if the demand for good x drops to zero, then demand for good q goes to zero as well and marginal changes in q no longer affect expenditure
  • Example: if swimming is too expensive, water quality is irrelevant
restricted compensated demand
Restricted compensated demand

p1

A

Choke price

The income equivalent or marginal WTP for a change in q: ABC

B

C

p*1

hx1(p1,q0,U1), initial demand for x1

hx1(p1,q0 +Dq ,U1), demand for x1 after increase in q

D

x1

welfare effects of quantity changes
Welfare effects of quantity changes
  • Measures of „surplus“ instead of „variation“ when consumers are not free to vary the quantity of q
  • In case of quantity changes, compensating and equivalent surplus are defined as
  • U0 results from (P,q0,M)
measures of changes in welfare for an environmental good
Measures of changes in welfare for an environmental good

Expenditure on private good x, M

D

ES/px

If q0 increases to q1, income has to

be reduced by CS/p to keep the same utility

B

M

M=pxx

A

CS/px

U3

U2

C

U1

q0

q1

Quantity/quality of environmental good q

wtp and wtac
WTP and WTAC
  • If the good is relatively unimportant ES and CS are roughly the same
  • If environmental goods are relatively scarcer than market commodities, one may expect the compensating variation/surplus (WTP) to be smaller than the equivalent variation/surplus (WTAC) for improvements
  • Differences between WTP and WTAC are mainly due to income effects
  • People view gains and losses differently
    • WTP is limited to an individual‘s income, WTAC is unbounded
    • Confirmed by empirical studies, but not uncontested
    • Implies that surveys, policies need to be carefully designed
  • Income effects are small only if the good is of little value relative to your overall wealth
theory and practice
Theory and practice
  • Horowitz and McConnell collect 208 observations of WTP and WTAC from 45 studies
  • For all studies, the average ratio WTAC/WTP is 7.2 (0.9)
  • However, for public or non-market goods, the ratio is 10.4 (2.5)
  • For ordinary goods, it is 2.9 (0.3)
  • For money, it is 2.1 (0.2)
methods for measuring demand
Methods for measuring demand
  • Indirect methods (use values)
    • Surrogate market where we observe expenditures on a related goods
    • Infer information on the trade-off between money and the environmental good
    • Hedonic pricing
    • Household production function approach
  • Direct methods (use and non-use values)
    • Hypothetical/constructed market
    • Contingent valuation: “value contingent on there being a market”
    • Choice modelling