html5-img
1 / 24

Genetic Positioning of Centromeres Using Half-Tetrad Analysis in a 4x-2x Cross Population of Potato

Genetic Positioning of Centromeres Using Half-Tetrad Analysis in a 4x-2x Cross Population of Potato. Park et al. Genetics 176: 85-94 (May 2007). CENTROMERES. Important functional elements of eukaryotic chromosomes Ensure proper cell division Ensure stable transmission of genetic material

frey
Download Presentation

Genetic Positioning of Centromeres Using Half-Tetrad Analysis in a 4x-2x Cross Population of Potato

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Genetic Positioning of Centromeres Using Half-Tetrad Analysis in a 4x-2x Cross Population of Potato Park et al. Genetics 176: 85-94 (May 2007)

  2. CENTROMERES • Important functional elements of eukaryotic chromosomes • Ensure proper cell division • Ensure stable transmission of genetic material • Determining their composition and structure can provide insight into their functional roles • Identification of genetic position important for: • Distinguishing chromosome arms • Identifying proximal and distal markers or genes • Providing fixed positions in genetic maps

  3. RECENT CENTROMERE RESEARCH • Centromeres sequenced and studied extensively in: • Arabidopsis • Maize • Rice • Wheat • Little sequencing has been reported for potato.

  4. MAIN GOALS OF RESEARCH • Use half-tetrad analysis (HTA) to localize centromeres on 12 potato chromosomes • Compare results of HTA with UHD map proposing possible centromere positions based on marker density (van Os et al. 2006) • Determine whether there is truly a single crossover per chromosome arm Previous publications on these issues were theoretical proposals or were limited in loci/chromosome number.

  5. 4x – 2x Population • Male parent • Diploid • Produced numerically-unreduced 2n pollen by first-division restitution (FDR) • Female parent • Tetraploid Tetraploid mapping population

  6. FDR vs. SDR • FDR • Abnormal orientation of spindles before anaphase II • Non-sister chromatids end up in the same nucleus • Efficiently transmits heterozygosity of original genotype • SDR • Premature cytokinesis before second meiotic division • Sister chromatids end up in the same nucleus

  7. FDR vs. SDR: Probability of Heterozygosity

  8. FDR vs. SDR: Probability of Heterozygosity

  9. van Os et al. 2006 • Proposed centromere position • based on strong clustering of AFLP markers on UHD genetic map • AFLP markers tend to be clustered in centromeric regions in several other species Park et al. compared their HTA-based results with the proposed positions of van Os et al.

  10. aaaa x ab

  11. aaaa x ab CROSSING OVER OCCURRED. D = [ f(aaaa) + f(aabb)] x 100 cM

  12. AFLP Marker Patterns A1: Six nulliplex offspring genotypes More crossing over, farther from centromere A2: One nulliplex offspring genotype Less crossing over, closer to centromere

  13. Frequency of homozygosity • Based on location on UHD map (van Os et al. 2006), grouped linkage groups • Within linkage groups, arranged according to genetic position • Calculated frequencies of alleles • 233 genotypes • Map position: • [f(aa) + f(bb)] x 100 • [(# homozygous alleles)/233] x 100

  14. Combining results: HTA and UHD Marker-to-centromere distance (% homozygosity) Gray box marks bin containing centromere Zero distance to centromere

  15. Centromere Locations

  16. Centromere Locations Telocentric predominantly terminal location of the centromere

  17. Centromere Locations What about chromosomes 3 and 11?

  18. Chromosomes 3 and 11 • No markers with 100% heterozygosity Approaching zero

  19. Other funny stuff: Chromosomes 1 and 5 • 100% heterozygosity found in the wrong bin (chromosomes 1, 5) • 99.6% heterozygosity found in the “centromere” bin (chromosome 1)

  20. Cross-over frequency Only one crossover per chromosome arm? • Chromosome 2 (telocentric) • one arm analyzed • Chromosome 4 (metacentric) • one arm analyzed • Chromosome 6 (metacentric) • both arms analyzed

  21. Cross-over frequency Boldface: all markers are heterozygous (centromeric) Block a: no crossovers Block b: one crossover Block c: two crossovers

  22. Number crossovers per 233 genotypes

  23. Cross-over frequency • Confirms that 2n pollen originated through FDR • Since some markers were entirely heterozygous, cannot have involved an SDR mechanism • Fewer noncrossover events on telocentric chr2 • Telocentric chromosome shows more crossover? • No. X-squared not significant. • Second crossover per chromosome arm very rare • 5/233 for chr2, 8/233 for chr4, 5/233 for chr6 • Indicates strong interference

  24. Summary of Results • Used HTA to localize centromeres of most potato chromosomes • Confirmed centromere positions with those in UHD map (van Os et al. 2006) • Marker density approach w/ UHD can be used for positioning centromeres • HTA in potato is also powerful for positioning centromeres

More Related