1 / 44

Teaching Resources

Teaching Resources. HST 2008. Are we really made up of Stars?. A brief History of our thinking The Greek thinker Empedocles first classified the fundamental elements as fire, air, earth, and water, although our particular diagram reflects Aristotle's classification. Did you know ?

fred
Download Presentation

Teaching Resources

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Teaching Resources HST 2008

  2. Are we really made up of Stars? A brief History of our thinking The Greek thinker Empedocles first classified the fundamental elements as fire, air, earth, and water, although our particular diagram reflects Aristotle's classification. Did you know? The ancient Chinese believed that the five basic components (in Pinyin, Wu Xing) of the physical universe were earth, wood, metal, fire, and water. And in India, the Samkhya-karikas by Ishvarakrsna (c. 3rd century AD) proclaims the five gross elements to be space, air, fire, water, and earth.

  3. So what is the MATTER? People have long asked, "What is the world made of?" and "What holds it together?" As far back as in the days of Aristotle, it was thought that things were made up of four types of fundamental elements. The word "fundamental" is key here. By fundamental building blocks we mean objects that are simple and structureless -- not made of anything smaller.

  4. What about more recently? • Based on scientific observations, our thinking has variously changed in the recent past. The story begins with John Dalton ...... • Dalton suggested that … • … everything is made up of very tiny particles. He named these smallest possible piece of an element ‘an atom’ – which in Greek means unbreakable. • Further he suggested that…. • Atoms are different for different elements. • Imagine atoms to be solid like billiard balls.

  5. Dalton Atomic Model Oxygen Atom Hydrogen Atom Gold Atom

  6. This makes a lot of sense. But! • From our scientific observations in chemical reactions, x-ray diffraction etc, we know today that this view was not entirely correct. Something was missing.. • However, Dalton’s ideas became the basis for our modern quest for the real constituents of matter (and antimatter!) • Possible web link to a CERN site with pictures, simulations or videos?

  7. Thomson Atomic Model • Proposed after discovery of “cathode rays” when a gas is ionized by a high voltage. • Neutral atoms contain smaller particles, called electrons. • Electrons exist in a “sea of positive charge” like plums in a pudding. Gold Atom

  8. Geiger-Marsden Experiment • Shot high energy a particles at a thin gold foil • Observed the pattern of scattered particles • Found some scattered by a larger angle than predicted by the Thomson model

  9. Rutherford Atomic Model • Positive charge is concentrated in the nucleus (only way to produce large scattering angles observed) • Coulomb force causes electrons to orbit the positive nucleus • Planetary model

  10. Problems with Rutherford Model Hydrogen Atom • Accelerating electrons should radiate energy according to Maxwell’s Electromagnetic theory • Radiating electrons are losing energy so they will spiral in towards the nucleus as they lose energy • No atom would be stable -- all would radiate away their energy

  11. Problems with Rutherford’s Model Predicted Hydrogen Emission Spectrum as atoms radiate energy

  12. Bohr’s Solution • Hydrogen electrons may only exist at certain distances from the nucleus (energy levels) • If they stay in the same energy level, they are stable (don’t radiate) • If they move from one level to another, they radiate to produce the discrete spectrum observed

  13. Neutrons • Ionized gas atoms are injected into a mass spectrometer • All atoms have the same charge and the velocity selector guarantees that they had the same velocity • Different radii are observed in the B-field deflection • Only way for this is to have atoms with same charge and different mass. (R = mv/qB) • There must be a neutral particle in the nucleus with significant mass = neutron • Atoms with same charge (protons) and different mass (neutrons) are called Isotopes

  14. Refined Atomic Model (Bohr) electron nucleus Helium Atom

  15. Vocabulary • Specific Nucleus = nuclide • Nuclear particles (protons and neutrons) = nucleons • Identically charged nuclei with different mass = isotopes • Generic nucleus symbol = • Number of nucleons = A = mass number • Number of protons = Z = charge (atomic) number

  16. Nuclear Forces • Clearly, if the nucleus contains a number of protons, the Coulomb force would predict that the protons should repel each other • There must some force that is stronger than the Coulomb force to hold them together = Strong Nuclear Force • Strong Nuclear Force also keeps neutrons in check in the nucleus • Acts like a spring between nucleons FE FE

  17. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius charge = +Ze a Particle Alpha ParticleKE Alpha Particle PE

  18. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius charge = +Ze a Particle Alpha ParticleKE Alpha Particle PE

  19. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius charge = +Ze a Particle Alpha ParticleKE Alpha Particle PE

  20. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius charge = +Ze a Particle Alpha ParticleKE Alpha Particle PE

  21. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius charge = +Ze a Particle Alpha ParticleKE Alpha Particle PE

  22. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius charge = +Ze a Particle Alpha ParticleKE Alpha Particle PE

  23. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius charge = +Ze a Particle Alpha ParticleKE Alpha Particle PE

  24. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius charge = +Ze a Particle Alpha ParticleKE Alpha Particle PE

  25. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius charge = +Ze a Particle Alpha ParticleKE Alpha Particle PE

  26. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius charge = +Ze a Particle Alpha ParticleKE Alpha Particle PE

  27. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius charge = +Ze a Particle Alpha ParticleKE Alpha Particle PE

  28. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius charge = +Ze a Particle Alpha ParticleKE Alpha Particle PE

  29. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius charge = +Ze a Particle Alpha ParticleKE Alpha Particle PE

  30. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius charge = +Ze a Particle Alpha ParticleKE Alpha Particle PE

  31. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius charge = +Ze a Particle Alpha ParticleKE Alpha Particle PE

  32. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius charge = +Ze a Particle charge = +2e E = KE Alpha ParticleKE Alpha Particle PE

  33. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius charge = +Ze a Particle charge = +2e R E = PE = Alpha ParticleKE Alpha Particle PE

  34. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius Initial E = (KE) Final E = PE = Conservation of Energy: (KE) = Solve for R =

  35. Estimating Nuclear Size • We can use the results from the scattering of positively charged particles to determine the nuclear radius Solve for R = Adjust initial KE until the a particle is no longer scattered back. Last scattered KE gives estimate of R. Empirical Result: R = (1.2 x 10-15)A1/3

  36. Nuclear Energy Levels • Alpha particles emitted by an unstable nucleus are found to have limited possible amounts of kinetic energy • Gamma rays (pure energy) emitted by an excited nucleus are found to produce discrete spectra • These results suggest that nuclei have energy levels just like atoms do

  37. 120 100 80 A - Z 60 40 20 10 20 50 60 70 30 40 80 Z Nuclear Stability • The nature of the strong nuclear force is that it is effective over very small distances Segre Plot of Stable Nuclides = stable • Small nuclei are stable when the number of neutrons = number of protons.

  38. 120 100 80 A - Z 60 40 20 10 20 50 60 70 30 40 80 Z Nuclear Stability • The nature of the strong nuclear force is that it is effective over very small distances Segre Plot of Stable Nuclides = stable • As Z increases, the number of neutrons necessary becomes larger than the number of protons.

  39. 120 100 80 A - Z 60 40 20 10 20 50 60 70 30 40 80 Z Nuclear Stability • The nature of the strong nuclear force is that it is effective over very small distances Segre Plot of Stable Nuclides = stable • For large values of Z, the number of neutrons becomes very large.

  40. 120 100 80 A - Z 60 40 20 10 20 50 60 70 30 40 80 Z Nuclear Stability • The nature of the strong nuclear force is that it is effective over very small distances Segre Plot of Stable Nuclides = stable • For large nuclei, the Coulomb force wins out over the strong nuclear force

  41. Nuclear Stability • The nature of the strong nuclear force is that it is effective over very small distances = range of nuclear force this proton can repel the proton on the opposite side of the nucleus this neutron is too far away to exert an attractive nuclear force on the nucleons on the opposite side of the nucleus • For large nuclei, the Coulomb force wins out over the strong nuclear force

  42. Nuclear Stability • The nature of the strong nuclear force is that it is effective over very small distances = range of nuclear force this proton can repel the proton on the opposite side of the nucleus this neutron is too far away to exert an attractive nuclear force on the proton on the opposite side of the nucleus • In addition, as the nucleons become too tightly packed the nuclear force will cause them to repel each other.

  43. Nuclear Stability • To achieve stability, the nucleus must either decrease its size by emitting clusters of nucleons (a particles) a particle emission

  44. Nuclear Stability • To achieve stability, the nucleus must either decrease its size by emitting clusters of nucleons (a particles) a particle emission neutron decays into proton and b particle b particle emission • Or, it must rearrange the nucleons to balance the nuclear force and Coulomb force (b particles)

More Related