1 / 9

Mixed-Income Development: Research Findings and Strategic Implications

This research paper discusses the findings and strategic implications of mixed-income development in Chicago, highlighting the benefits and challenges for residents and providing key strategic decisions for promoting social mobility, sustaining well-functioning developments, and building community.

floydm
Download Presentation

Mixed-Income Development: Research Findings and Strategic Implications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mixed-Income Development in Chicago: Research Findings and Strategic Implications Mark L. Joseph Case Western Reserve University Neighborhoods of Choice and Opportunity Forum HUD-PD&R/CLPHA March 16, 2011

  2. Outline • 1) Preview main conclusions and implications • 2) Highlight key research findings • 3) Highlight implications for strategic decisions

  3. Conclusions • Mixed-income development has unique promise as a poverty deconcentration strategy • Implementation deeply complicated • Benefits to residents exist, but not clear cut • Physical revitalization is just the beginning • Building community and changing life trajectories will require sustained, comprehensive, strategic effort

  4. Research on Implementation Process • Complexity of development process • Strength of early market demand • Impact of current housing market crisis • Challenge of relocating/recruiting public housing residents

  5. Research on Resident Experiences Positive • High satisfaction with physical environment • Reductions in stress associated with safety and social disorder • Some articulation of increased aspirations

  6. Research on Resident Experiences Challenges • Increased stress: rules, monitoring, norms • Low social interaction, some self-isolation • Public space, unsupervised children • Sense of stigma, perceptions of difference: “us vs. them dynamics”

  7. Key Strategic Decisions • Promoting social and economic mobility: • “housing plus” • Who benefits? Screening v. inclusion • Is raising return rates a goal?

  8. Key Strategic Decisions • Promoting and sustaining well-functioning developments • Stimulating market demand: seeking “right” mix • Safety and social control: whose responsibility? whose rules? • Neighborhood amenities: often a missing piece • Inclusive governance: voice and representation for all

  9. Key Strategic Decisions • From building housing to building community • Goals • Clarify goals, expectations and roles • Identifying shared interests, countering “us vs. them” • Strategies • Design: Buildings and open space • Property management • Inclusive services and amenities • Support for “positive neighboring”

More Related