180 likes | 277 Views
This study examines income volatility and labor mobility in Russian regions and their effects on fiscal policy. It explores the consequences for unemployment and regional shocks, focusing on the response to oil shocks and the role of fiscal transfers. Using data from various countries, the research analyzes regional income differences, shocks, and the reasons behind Russia's susceptibility to idiosyncratic shocks. It discusses the measurement of shocks and the different adjustment styles observed in various economies. The econometric detour explores responses to income and population shocks, particularly in relation to regional unemployment. The study compares American, European, Russian, and Latin American styles of adjustment to regional shocks, highlighting differences in labor mobility, housing markets, fiscal transfers, and policy roles.
E N D
Income volatility, labor mobility, and fiscal policy in Russian regions Goohoon Kwon Antonio Spilimbergo IMF IMF, CEPR, WDI
Outline • Brief Description of Regions (GDP. Income shocks. Welfare. Integration) • Tale of three adjustments • Consequence for Unemployment • Source of regional volatility • Fiscal Response to oil shocks • Transfers • Conclusions
Data • Russia (89 regions) • US (50 states + DC) • China (30 provinces) • Canada (11 provinces) • Europe 15 (178 regions)
Why are Russia regions subject to large idiosyncratic shocks? • Natural Resources are concentrated in few regions • Soviet faith in economy to scale has created “excessive” specialization
How to measure shocks? • Oil shock = (oil price) * (size energy sector) • Industrial shock = rer * (size manufacturing sector)
Table 1. Regional growth and regional shocks Fixed effects Arellano-Bond oil shock 1.64*** industrial shock -0.11** Lag D.gdpgrowth -0.04 D.oil shock 2.28 *** D.industrial shock -0.23*** Constant 2.85 1.98*** Number of samples 760 608 Number of Regions 76 76 ** p<.05; *** p<.01 Source of Shocks
Tale of three adjustments How do economies react to regional shocks? Do people stay in distressed areas or do they move? To answer this question we need to make an econometric detour
Adjustment - American Style • Flexible Labor and housing markets. • Limited unemployment benefits. • Labor is highly mobile. • Variation in regional unemployment is limited.
Adjustment – European Style • Rigid labor and housing markets • Unemployment subsidies. • Regional fiscal transfers. • Scarce labor mobility. • Large variation in regional unemployment. • Persistency in regional unemployment.
Adjustment – Russian style • Large shocks • Scarce labor mobility • Rigid housing market (housing subsidies) • Fiscal transfers not necessarily targeted to compensate shocks
Adjustment – Latin American style • Large shocks • Small role for fiscal policy (procyclical) • Population concentrates in large cities (Argentina, Chile, Uruguay among the highest urban concentration)