1 / 31

Adoption of Rainwater Management Practice in the Blue Nile

Adoption of Rainwater Management Practice in the Blue Nile. A Description and Analysis of the IFPRI Farm Survey on Climate Change. Noémie Defourny Ms. in Economics , UCL ( Belgium ). Internship Timeline. ILRI: Static Bio Physical Household level Model

fionan
Download Presentation

Adoption of Rainwater Management Practice in the Blue Nile

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Adoption of Rainwater Management Practice in the Blue Nile A Description and Analysis of the IFPRI Farm Survey on Climate Change Noémie Defourny Ms. in Economics , UCL (Belgium)

  2. Internship Timeline • ILRI: Static Bio PhysicalHouseholdlevel Model Cikeda (Cirad) - IAT (CSIRO) Solutions Feasability in Boneya • ILRI-IWMI: NBDC Data set 2005-IFPRI

  3. Nile Basin Development Challenge Objective: to improve the resilience of rural livelihoods in the Ethiopian highlands through a landscape approach to rainwater management. • Water scarcity and land degradation – concerns livelihoods of millions households in Sub-Saharan Africa • Water for agriculture – crop production to feed population and Animal 70 to 90% of the all water used in the region. • Growing populations • Need - to reverse land degradation - to improve water productivity. • Landscape (watershed) approach to rainwater management To better target or ‘match’ promising technologies (or whole strategies) with particular environments.

  4. Nile Basin Development Challenge N3 : on Targeting and scaling out Objective : creating feasibility maps for rainwater management strategies that include socio-economic constraints. One approach : Mapping Willingness of Adoption Procedure : Define adoption rules Based on census data (=data for the whole basin), simulate “virtual farmers” Run adoption rules on the simulated farmer

  5. Integrating socio economic into feasibility maps Bio-physical suitability Willingness to adopt Feasibility map

  6. Objective of the internship • Aggregate the IFPRI “Climate Change” survey (phase 1) to farm level • Describe the dataset in terms of Water Related and Soil Conservation Practices • Compute Variables • Run first Adoption Models

  7. IFPRIFarmSurvey on Climate Change (2005) • General features: Geo-referenced (GPS coordinates) 1,000 households (6,168 individuals) 3 Regions: Fogera, Jeldu and Dapo areas. Gender 51.4% of male 48.6% of female Ethnic 40% Oromo Ethnic group 31% Amhara 15% Tigrayan 15% BeninshangulGumuz 5.00% from SNPP Religion 86.7% Christian 13% are Islamic.

  8. Descriptive Statistics • Household level Characteristics 90.10% household heads male Age: head45 years old spouse 35 years Size < 6 persons Farmer’s experience in agriculture 23 years Education 5 years of school

  9. Household characteristics (cont’d) Assets Drought power: 72.2% own oxen 32.4% donkey 12% own horse Labor Labor intensive: Meher, Livestock, Perennials Own labor: Hired labor: Off-farm jobs: seasonal trends Meher > Belg (trader, paid laborers)

  10. Household characteristics (cont’d) • LandTotal 1.9 ha 3 plots/H, 0.79 Ha Water Source Rainfed 95.26%, river 2% Distance to homestead 1.4 km Certification

  11. Household characteristics (cont’d) • Fertility 60% moderately 30% plots highly • Use • Erosion Exposure

  12. Access to Water • Distance31.7 km • Source of Water • Pump 2.60 % Hh Type Diesel ; 23% Manual Ownership 69.20% HH jointly Purpose Irrigate the crops; garden

  13. Access to Water (cont’d) • Water Storage 8.50% Hh Type Ownership Purpose

  14. Access to Advice, Market and Credits • Access to Advice • Access to Market • Transportation 93.83% On foot 3.34%. Animal 2.43% Motorized vehicle

  15. Access to Advice, Market and Credits (cont’d) • Access to Credit 50.00% have at least borrowed money once. Purpose Source Frequency

  16. Shocks and Aid • Aid Reason for aid activity’ implementation Type

  17. Crop level Characteristics • Fragmentation • Type

  18. Crop level Characteristics (cont’d) • Irrigation • Fertilizer

  19. Crop level Characteristics (cont’d) • Soil Conservation techniques 74.5% households practices at least one type Type

  20. Perennials • Type • Purpose

  21. Perennials (cont’d) • Irrigation4.10% Hh Furrow at 48.44% , sprinkle 1 pump • FertilizersOnly Manure 4.30% of household 6.20% perennials • Share 78.2% perennials - 100% plot 20.81% perennials - ≤50% plot • Sell36.9% of household

  22. Livestock 92.3% of household - 3,576 animals. 17.4% of livestock are lost of disease • Type

  23. Livestock (cont’d) • Source of Feed: • Source of water:

  24. Perception of Climate Change (over last 20 yrs) • Variation of Rainfall Declined according to 61.53% Hh • Variation of Temperature # of Hot Days, 67.72% Hh • Perceived Cause of rainfall variation Poor vegetation cover (78.98% ) • Variation of vegetation cover 50% Hh unchanged, for 35% decreasing. • Major constraints in changing your farming ways

  25. Perception of Climate Change (cont’d) • Adjustments made to LT shifts - in temperature - in rainfalls

  26. Willingness to Adopt Model Specification • The framework can be estimated with a multivariate PROBIT estimation. Qualitative depend variable Probit: linear probability model y= α+ βn,ixn,i+ βn+1,ixn+1,i+εi y= Pr(PumpT) • Coefficient Estimators are not BLUE • R² is not a good measure of equation performance. Pseudo-r² (goodness-of fit, maximum loglikelihood)

  27. Results: First Adoption Models 1. Adoption of Pump as a Water Management Strategy technology

  28. 2. Adopting Planting tree as a SWC technique

  29. 3. Adoption of SC Techniques (Soil bunds, Stone bunds, Grass Stripes and Plouhging contour)

  30. Results • PUMPS More productive farmers, closer to market, hiring labour, owning oxen and being informed. • TREE PLANTING Plot near homestead, middle size farmers • SC TECHNIQUES Poorer farmers, further from market & more likely to received Aid

  31. Thank you for your Attention & Thank you for welcoming me at ILRI/IWMI!

More Related