GRAMIS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

finola
slide1 n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
GRAMIS PowerPoint Presentation
play fullscreen
1 / 47
Download Presentation
GRAMIS
103 Views
Download Presentation

GRAMIS

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. GRAMIS

  2. Johan van der Auwera Antwerpen Liesbeth Degand Louvain-la-Neuve

  3. Grammaticalization

  4. He sings well. well. Grammaticalization He might well be home. well

  5. He sings well. well. manner adverb Grammaticalization modal marker He might well be home. well

  6. He sings well. well. manner adverb Grammaticalization Subjectification modal marker He might well be home. well

  7. He sings well. well. manner adverb Grammaticalization Subjectification modal marker He might well be home. well Well, he is home now. Well,

  8. He sings well. well. manner adverb Grammaticalization Subjectification modal marker He might well be home. well discourse marker Well, he is home now. Well,

  9. He sings well. well. manner adverb Grammaticalization Subjectification modal marker He might well be home. well Intersubjectification discourse marker Well, he is home now. Well,

  10. 2007 2011

  11. 2008 2009 … 2007 Fall 2007 Spring 2010 2011

  12. 2008 2009 … 2007 Fall 2007 Spring 2010 2011 WP 1 - Modality ‘Jespersen cycle’ ne …. ne pas …. pas van der Auwera, J. (2009) ‘The Jespersen cycles’, In: E. Van Gelderen (ed.), Cyclical change, 35–71. Amsterdam: Benjamins. van der Auwera, J. (2010) ‘On the diachrony of negation’, In: L. R. Horn (ed.), The expression of negation, 73-101. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Devos, M. , Kasombo Tshibanda, M. & van der Auwera, J. (in print) ‘Jespersen cycles in Kanincin: Double, triple and maybe even quadruple negation’, Africana Linguistica Devos, M. & van der Auwera, J. (under revision) ‘Jespersen cycles in Bantu: Double and triple negation’ Conference presentations in Tervuren, Berkeley, Caen, Berlin, Manchester, Osaka

  13. 2008 2009 … 2007 Fall 2007 Spring 2010 2011 WP 4 - Discourse New Reflections on Grammaticalization in Leuven , 2008 L. Degand & A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen , a workshop called ‘Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization and/or (Inter)Subjectification: Methodological issues for the study of discourse markers’. L. Degand & A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen Joint paper , separate papers G. Diewald Paper Now in print in Linguistics

  14. 2008 2009 … 2007 Fall 2007 Spring 2010 2011 English complementation Leuven - Cuyckens

  15. A Leuven

  16. 2008 2009 … 2007 Fall 2007 Spring 2010 2011 English complementation Leuven - Cuyckens English NP Leuven - Davidse Brems, L. 2007 The synchronic layering of size noun and type noun constructions in English.

  17. 2008 2009 … 2007 Fall 2007 Spring 2010 2011 English complementation Leuven - Cuyckens English NP Leuven - Davidse Gent Hannover Louvain-la-Neuve Discourse particles in English, French, Dutch & German

  18. 2008 2009 … 2007 Fall 2007 Spring 2010 2011 English complementation Leuven - Cuyckens English NP Leuven - Davidse Gent Hannover Louvain-la-Neuve Leuven Antwerpen Discourse particles in English, French, Dutch & German including modal ones

  19. A A Antwerpen A Gent Leuven

  20. 2008 2009 … 2007 Fall 2007 Spring 2010 2011 English complementation Leuven - Cuyckens English NP Leuven - Davidse Gent Hannover Louvain-la-Neuve Leuven Antwerpen Discourse particles in English, French, Dutch & German including modal ones Gent Leuven Antwerpen Modality

  21. A Leuven A A Antwerpen Gent

  22. WP1: Modality Polarity WP2: Evidentiality WP3: Mood WP4: Discourse WP5: Complementation Argument structure WP6:Nominal modification Scalarity, indefiniteness WP7: Theoretical implications

  23. WP1: Modality Polarity WP2: Evidentiality WP3: Mood WP4: Discourse WP5: Complementation Argument structure WP6:Nominal modification Scalarity, indefiniteness WP7: Theoretical implications

  24. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses

  25. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues:

  26. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification

  27. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification Grammaticalization + Subjectification ?

  28. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification Grammaticalization + Subjectification ? Grammaticalization + Intersubjectification ?

  29. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification Grammaticalization + Subjectification ? Grammaticalization + Intersubjectification ? Degrammaticalization + Subjectification ? Degrammaticalization + Intersubjectification ?

  30. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification Grammaticalization + Subjectification ? Grammaticalization + Intersubjectification ? Degrammaticalization + Subjectification ? Degrammaticalization + Intersubjectification ? Analogical change + Subjectification ? Analogical change + Intersubjectification ?

  31. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification Grammaticalization + Subjectification ? Grammaticalization + Intersubjectification ? Degrammaticalization + Subjectification ? Degrammaticalization + Intersubjectification ? Analogical change + Subjectification ? Analogical change + Intersubjectification ? Relation between (de)grammaticalization and analogical change?

  32. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification Grammaticalization + Subjectification ? Grammaticalization + Intersubjectification ? Degrammaticalization + Subjectification ? Degrammaticalization + Intersubjectification ? Analogical change + Subjectification ? Analogical change + Intersubjectification ? Relation between (de)grammaticalization and analogical change? Desubjectification? De-intersubjectification?

  33. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification HOW?

  34. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification HOW? ① Already partial answers

  35. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification HOW? ② International conference on Nov 11-13 2010

  36. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification HOW? ③ Projects in preparation

  37. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification HOW? BUT 2016