1 / 66

Analyzing Student Achievement Trends tied to NCLB

Analyzing Student Achievement Trends tied to NCLB. Rolf Blank, Ph.D. Director of Education Indicators Council of Chief State School Officers Connecticut State Conference Univ. of Connecticut, March 19, 2008. CCSSO Projects / Sources/Web Sites.

fidelio
Download Presentation

Analyzing Student Achievement Trends tied to NCLB

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Analyzing Student Achievement Trends tied to NCLB Rolf Blank, Ph.D. Director of Education Indicators Council of Chief State School Officers Connecticut State Conference Univ. of Connecticut, March 19, 2008

  2. CCSSO Projects / Sources/Web Sites • CCSSO Accountability Systems and Reporting State Collaborative project (28 states, incl. Connecticut), e.g. Implementers Guide to Growth Models, 2008 • State Education Indicators project (annual state profiles)—10 years • www.ccsso.org/projects /Accountability _Systems • www.schooldatadirect .org • www.SECsurvey.org • “Developing Student Achievement Tests under NCLB Accountability Requirements: A policymaker’s primer” [PPT Assisted by Adam Petermann, CCSSO]

  3. Questions for State Analysis • What are the measures at state, district, school level for determining performance NCLB? Then, Are we improving? • For state educators: To what extent are measures valid, reliable?—and reports are useful? • What other measures could we analyze? (e.g. • A) external, cross-state measure • B) in-depth within state system alignment • How does performance in our system compare with other states?

  4. Premises of NCLB • Accountability tied to state standards, assessments, and systems at school level, district, state • All schools and students are accountable • Improve student performance to proficient level by 2014 • Improve performance of all student groups, esp. low-income, special education, limited English • Accountability system identifies schools needing improvement, and sanctions/reforms • Accountability will provide incentives toward improved system performance

  5. Connecticut State Facts

  6. Connecticut Education Facts Number of schools, by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program

  7. Massachusetts State Facts

  8. Massachusetts Education Facts Number of schools, by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program

  9. Wisconsin State Facts

  10. Wisconsin Education Facts Number of schools, by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program

  11. Connecticut AYP Trend

  12. Massachusetts AYP Trend

  13. Wisconsin AYP Trend

  14. Cross State Overview

  15. Connecticut State Assessment Proficiency Trends

  16. Massachusetts State Assessment Proficiency Trends

  17. Wisconsin State Assessment Proficiency Trends

  18. State Reading Assessment Trend by Race, Connecticut

  19. State Reading Assessment Trend by Race, Massachusetts

  20. State Reading Assessment Trend by Race, Wisconsin

  21. Cross State Student Achievement Trends: State Assessments

  22. Cross State Student Achievement Trends: NAEP

  23. Connecticut NAEP Proficiency Trends

  24. Massachusetts NAEP Proficiency Trends

  25. Wisconsin NAEP Achievement Trends

  26. NAEP Definition of Proficiency 4th Grade Reading 8th Grade Math

  27. NAEP Closing the Gap by Minority, Reading and Mathematics

  28. Connecticut NAEP vs. State Assessment

  29. Massachusetts NAEP vs. State Assessment

  30. Wisconsin NAEP vs. State Assessment

  31. SAMPLE AYP OVERVIEW, from schooldatadirect.org

  32. Hartford School District, Connecticut Reading Grade 4, State Assessment, Proficient and Above Math Grade 8, State Assessment, Proficient and Above

  33. Worcester School District, Massachusetts Reading Grade 4, State Assessment, Proficient and Above Math Grade 8, State Assessment, Proficient and Above

  34. Kenosha School District, Wisconsin Reading Grade 4, State Assessment, Proficient and Above Math Grade 8, State Assessment, Proficient and Above

More Related