1 / 8

Track B - Analyzing Results

Track B - Analyzing Results. Community Mitigation Activities in Relation to FEMA HMGP, FMA, and Project Impact Grants. Track B - Hazard Mitigation Matrix. ALLIED RISK- REDUCTION ACTIVITY. SPIN OFF. OTHER MITIGATION. TYPE OF COMMUNITY PROGRAM. NOT APPLICABLE. SPILLOVER.

feo
Download Presentation

Track B - Analyzing Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Track B - Analyzing Results Community Mitigation Activities in Relation to FEMA HMGP, FMA, and Project Impact Grants

  2. Track B - Hazard Mitigation Matrix ALLIED RISK- REDUCTION ACTIVITY SPIN OFF OTHER MITIGATION TYPE OF COMMUNITY PROGRAM NOT APPLICABLE SPILLOVER INSIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT EFFECT OF FEMA GRANT ON TIMING OF PROGRAMMATIC ACTIVITY

  3. Track B - Criteria for Characterizing Programmatic Mitigation Activities Spin-off activity • Not directly funded by FEMA • Must result directly or indirectly from FEMA hazard mitigation grant support

  4. Track B - Criteria for Characterizing Programmatic Mitigation Activities Allied risk-reduction activity • Must have begun prior to FEMA funding, but a portion of the activity may have received some FEMA funding • Must be a synergistic activity that is not a spin-off activity (because FEMA support had no significant impact on its content or timing)

  5. Track B - Criteria for Characterizing Programmatic Mitigation Activities Spillover effect (an established term in economics) • Not funded by FEMA • Must result in direct and indirect increases in economic activity in the more conventional use of the terms direct (increase in business activity of the new or revitalized enterprises) and indirect (multiplier effects)

  6. Template for Results of Track B Quantitative • Number of grants • Number of project grants • Number of process grants • Total Amount of Grants ($) • Can be broken down into federal and local shares • Total Amount of Project Grants ($) • Total Amount of Process Grants ($) • Year first grant was awarded • Number of identified spin-off activities • Number of identified spin-off activities - project • Number of identified spin-off activities - process • Total Amount spent on spin-off activities ($) • Ratio: Total Amount of spin-off activities/Total amount of federal dollars from mitigation grants (Possibly: benefit/cost ratios for specified projects and portfolio of projects, dependent on information available and cost to calculate)

  7. Template for Results of Track B (cont’d.) Other Activities - Quantitative • Year joined CRS, if joined • Number of non-FEMA federal agency mitigation grants • Total Amount of non-FEMA federal agency mitigation grants ($) • Year first non-FEMA federal agency mitigation grant was awarded

  8. Template for Results of Track B (cont’d.) Qualitative (with binary responses, yes or no) • Community institutionalization of mitigation management activities • Maintenance of mitigation projects • Passage of bonds or use of other funds for capital projects • Passage of more stringent regulations and/or ordinances related to mitigation • Mobilization and involvement of citizens in development of hazard mitigation plans • Existence of at least two generations of champions • Involvement of a significant number of partners in community mitigation activities • Cooperation of the development community

More Related