1 / 47

DEC10-06: Frozen Precipitation Detection System for SODAR Systems

DEC10-06: Frozen Precipitation Detection System for SODAR Systems . by Ashor Chirackal, Imran Butt and Michelle Tan Advisor: Prof. Tim Bigelow Client: Mr. Doug Taylor (John Deere Renewables). What is a SODAR?. SODAR (Sonic detection and Ranging)

fayola
Download Presentation

DEC10-06: Frozen Precipitation Detection System for SODAR Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DEC10-06: Frozen Precipitation Detection System for SODAR Systems by Ashor Chirackal, Imran Butt and Michelle Tan Advisor: Prof. Tim Bigelow Client: Mr. Doug Taylor (John Deere Renewables)

  2. What is a SODAR? • SODAR (Sonic detection and Ranging) • Generates sound pulse and listens for the echo from the atmosphere to detect the changes in the reflected wave • Uses Sound pulse to measure wind shear • Based on those changes calculates the speed at that height • A SODAR system is used to measure wind shear for up to 200 meters.

  3. What is a SODAR? • The SODAR system that we are currently working with is the 4000WE model designed by the Atmospheric Systems Corp. (ASC). • John Deere has several of these SODAR systems located at different wind farms for data collection. • The SODAR is primarily powered by a solar panel and has a generator as a secondary source

  4. Top View(Operations)

  5. What's wrong with SODARs • SODARs need the reflector board to be clear of obstacles • Over winter snow gets accumulated on the reflector board and corrupts the readings • The current snow detection is ineffecient and needs to be replaced

  6. Problems Elaborated • Normal Operation

  7. Problems Elaborated • Distortion in the sound reflection due to accumulation of snow (on left) and un-even ice (on right)

  8. Effects • Current system is inefficient in detecting snow • Has many false positives. • Heater is turned on when not required (in rain) • Inefficient control of the heater • Used longer than is actually required • This results in high power consumption which leads to hibernation mode • Since SODARs are located remotely it is very difficult to get the maintenance out to fix the SODARs

  9. Problem Statement Optimizing the number of times the heater is turned on to reduce power consumption by designing a more efficient and accurate method to detect the conditions in which the SODAR equipment needs to use the heater. The necessary conditions and requirements are outlined below: • Able to tell the difference of snow and ice accumulation on the reflector plate. • Able to detect powdery snow that distorts the SODAR readings and needs to be melted. • Able to tell how much snow is present to calculate the time the heater should run

  10. Conceptual Sketch

  11. Conceptual Sketch • The main Idea is to use passive sensors to detect snow accumulation • Use the sound waves generated by the speakers to our advantage • Piezoelectric sensors could be used by placing them on top of the reflector pad • There will be changes in the voltage signal when the surface is clear of snow as compared to surface covered with snow

  12. Concept Sketch

  13. Concept In detail

  14. Functional Requirements Power consumption • Lower than the current system. • More efficient in terms of power consumption to delay hibernation mode. ( 25 Watts) • Reduce the number of times the heater is turned on. Heater Control • Heater should not be used if • smooth and flat ice layer is present. • water or rain is present. • Heater should be used if • there is an accumulation of snow that interferes SODAR operation • Variance of ice on the reflector pad

  15. Functional Requirements • Frozen precipitation detector • can tell the difference between snow and ice accumulation on the reflector pad. • Quarter Inch • can detect a variance on the reflector pad. • must withstand the temperature of the heating pad. • must not interfere with the acoustic environment of the SODAR

  16. Non-functional Requirements • Financial • Economical and affordable. • Within $500 • Limited Budget (subsidized by John Deere). • Installation/Manufacturing/ Maintenance • Simple. • Adaptable. • Easy to maintain. • Reliable.

  17. Non-Functional Requirements • Weather • Must be able to withstand various weather conditions i.e. snow storms, blizzards • 100F to -30F • Rain or flat layer of snow or ice will not be an issue as long as they do not disrupt with the operations of the SODAR system

  18. System Diagram

  19. Technical Considerations 1) Microprocessor • It needs to have the right amount of input/output ports to collect data from the sensors and control the operation of the heater. • This will also depend upon the number of piezoelectric plates The processor speed needs to be high enough to take readings from the sensors and analyze them. • C language will be used to program the microprocessor. • The output signal to run the heater must be in standard TTL.

  20. Technical Considerations (cont.) 2) Piezoelectric plates • The piezoelectric plates should have the material strength to with stand the temperature extremes of the environment. • The response of the piezoelectric plates must be clear enough to be analyzed by the microprocessor. 3) Secondary sensors • Secondary sensors, if employed, will change some requirements of the microprocessor

  21. Market Survey • The Frozen Precipitation Detection project is very unique to the client’s needs and specification. • The piezoelectric sensors are used in other applications such as quality assurance, process control, measurements of various processes etc. • Their use in detecting snow is very unique and we haven’t been able to find an application of piezoelectric sensors that are used in detecting snow or ice. • Some applications where piezoelectricity is used are outlined below • Detection and generation of sonar waves • Power monitoring in high power applications • Automotive engine management systems • Acoustic emission testing • Inkjet printers

  22. Potential Risks • Light snow that is less dense with more air pockets might not be detected by the piezoelectric sensor. • A secondary sensor will be put in to make the system more effective.  The secondary sensor will act as a back-up system. • The project might not be able to be tested under the right weather conditions. • Starts in Spring and ends in Fall (No snow !!!)

  23. Potential Risks • Piezoelectric Plates are custom made and most manufacturers have a minimum order of $500!!

  24. Resource estimates

  25. Functional Decomposition • The piezoelectric sensors • will be placed either on top of the heating pad or underneath the fiber glass layer of the reflector pad. • The output from the SODAR speakers will be the input for the piezoelectric sensors. • A weather sensor is connected which will provide the outside temperature. The secondary sensor represents an optional sensor that might compliment the primary sensor.

  26. Functional Decomposition • A microcontroller • is used with the previous sensors to determine optimal heating times. Our plan is to integrate this microprocessor with the piezoelectric sensor and the secondary sensor. • C programming is to be used to program the microprocessor. • The piezoelectric sensor and the secondary sensor must be in sync with each other. In order to integrate these sensors, we will program the microprocessor using C programming.

  27. Detailed Design • Our final implementation will be highly influenced by our test results. Currently our team has two ideas to implement the piezoelectric solution for our project. The difference in the two ideas is the location of the piezoelectric plates on the SODAR System. • On the heating pad • Underneath the fiber glass layer

  28. Layers of the Reflector Pad

  29. Detailed Design • The first Layer is the Heating surface • The second layer is a fiber glass layer. The purpose of the fiberglass is to reflect the sound energy into the atmosphere. • Underneath the Lead layer is the frame to hold all these layers. The manufacturer has allowed us to use up to 1 inch of spacing after the Lead layer.

  30. Alternative for Piezoelectric plates • Since the spacing under the fiber glass is wide, the team might decide to use microphones instead of piezoelectric • Microphones are easier to implement as compared to piezoelectric

  31. Detailed Design • If our team finds it more feasible to place the sensors underneath the fiber glass layer, it will be easier to protect the sensors from weather conditions. • Further spacing allows us to use microphones for sound detection instead of piezoelectric sensors. The microphones will greatly simplify the implementation of our project.

  32. HW/SW Technology • The SODAR uses a computer system onboard. • Currently, the computer is used for data collection. • The computer uses a Linux operating system and is programmed using the C language. • If required this computer system might be used to do some data processing for our sensors

  33. Test Plan • Obtaining several types of piezoelectric plates that will potentially work for the project. • Testing the piezoelectric plates and analyze their characteristics. • Testing the piezoelectric plates with snow and ice conditions/ temperature conditions. • Obtaining a microprocessor and programming the microprocessor using C language. • Connecting the piezoelectric sensors with the microcontroller and the temperature sensor. • Measure the sound waves on the current SODAR system to determine installation placement and feasibility of the design. • If feasible, high level testing/simulation will be conducted where multiple piezoelectric plates will be placed and connected on a board (under a fiber glass or above a rubber pad) with inputs from the temperature sensor.

  34. Test Plan: Where to place the sensors? • Directly on the reflector pad • Placing piezoelectric directly on the reflector pad has some advantages and disadvantages. • Advantages: • The strength of the sound pulse will be strong enough for the piezoelectric plate to pick up the signal and give a good electrical signal. • It will be simpler to differentiate between the case of a clear reflector board and a board covered with snow. This is because the snow will be directly covering the surface of the piezoelectric and the difference in the response of the piezoelectric will be easier to identify • Disadvantages: • The piezoelectric will be directly impacted by the weather conditions (rain snow etc) • The piezoelectric might absorb some sound energy which is crucial for the SODAR measurements • Our test approach will include these considerations and compare the advantages and disadvantages of this approach and verify the usefulness of placing piezoelectric on the reflector pad.

  35. Test Plan: Where to place the sensors? • Under the fiber glass layer of the reflector pad • Advantages • The mounting of our sensors will be simplified as our sensors (piezoelectric or microphones) will not be exposed to the outside weather. • Disadvantages: • The strength of the sound pulse will be reduced and it might be more challenging to detect a sound pulse as fiber glass is a good reflector of sound • Interference of sound from other sides of the SODAR • For our design we are more interested in the sound pulse coming directly from the speakers. Based on the distortions created by snow accumulation the microphones will generate a different signal. • If the strength of that sound is weaker as compared to the sound interference from other sides of the SODAR then it will be difficult to identify the presence of snow.

  36. Unit Testing of a Piezoelectric

  37. Testing Setup

  38. Testing Equipment Used • Piezoelectric Plate • Images Scientific Instruments • PZ-04 • Krohn-Hite Filter • Speaker • Function Generator • Oscilloscope • Amplifier Circuit

  39. Generated Signal Without any input

  40. Outputs A peak at 3.5 Khz; which was the frequency of the speaker placed on the piezoelectric

  41. Output: Unit Test (Peak Detection) A peak at 3.5 Khz; which was the frequency of the speaker placed on the piezoelectric

  42. Current Status • Present: • Unit testing • Found a company that will provide us the piezoelectric plates without minimum order. (Noliac) • Future: • Ordering a piezoelectric plate that fits our specs (curie temperature, thickness, detects sound) • Amplifying circuit that will work best with the piezoelectric that we are working with.

  43. Contributions • Ashor Chirackal • Team Leader • Hours: 60 • Michelle Tan • Communications • Hours: 50 • Imran Butt • Webmaster • Hours: 55

  44. Plans for next semester • Visit the SODAR and measure sound pressure • Order parts • More testing • Programming the microprocessor • Build a prototype • Test out on SODAR

  45. Questions?

More Related