1 / 21

IEEE 802.11 Regulatory SC DSRC Coexistence Tiger Team DRAFT Teleconference Plan and Agenda

IEEE 802.11 Regulatory SC DSRC Coexistence Tiger Team DRAFT Teleconference Plan and Agenda. Date: 2014-12-19. Authors:. Abstract. This presentation is the plan for the December 19 th , 2014 IEEE 802.11 (Regulatory Standing Committee) DSRC Coexistence Tiger Team teleconference. Agenda.

ezhno
Download Presentation

IEEE 802.11 Regulatory SC DSRC Coexistence Tiger Team DRAFT Teleconference Plan and Agenda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IEEE 802.11 Regulatory SCDSRC Coexistence Tiger TeamDRAFT Teleconference Plan and Agenda Date: 2014-12-19 Authors: Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  2. Abstract This presentation is the plan for the December 19th, 2014 IEEE 802.11 (Regulatory Standing Committee) DSRC Coexistence Tiger Team teleconference. Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  3. Agenda • Recording secretary volunteer • Administrative 2.1 Approve agenda 2.2 Review IEEE Guidelines 2.3 Minutes approval – November 11 – TABLED December 12 - TABLED 2.4 Background 2.5 Work to Date • Old business 3.1 DSRC Coexistence Tiger Team Final Report (Draft) – update 4. New business 4.1 Straw poll – proposed questions 5. Adjourn Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  4. Administrative Items • Required notices • Affiliation FAQ - http://standards.ieee.org/faqs/affiliationFAQ.html • Anti-Trust FAQ - http://standards.ieee.org/resources/antitrust-guidelines.pdf • Ethics - http://www.ieee.org/portal/cms_docs/about/CoE_poster.pdf • IEEE 802.11 Working Group Policies and Procedures - https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/public-file/07/11-07-0360-04-0000-802-11-policies-and-procedures.doc • Chair and Secretary • Chair of this tiger team is Jim Lansford (CSR) • Asking for volunteers for a Recording Secretary • Please send an email to the addresses below to have your attendance recorded • Jim.lansford@ieee.org Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  5. Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings • All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. • Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. • Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. • Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. • Technical considerations remain primary focus • Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. • Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. • Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. --------------------------------------------------------------- See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  6. SC Operating Rules – Tiger Team • Anybody can vote, present, and make motions • This is a tiger team – it is an ad hoc meeting of the 802.11 Regulatory Standing Committee • Any documents that are generated by this group that are intended for distribution outside of IEEE 802.11 (e.g., 802.18) must be approved with a 75% majority by the larger 802.11 Regulatory SC • Voting on documents must occur at an interim or plenary meeting • Only 802.11 voters may vote on documents to be approved for forwarding to other IEEE 802 working groups • Any submissions to this group must be posted to the IEEE document server (Mentor) • Anyone can view IEEE 802.11 emails and download documents from Mentor: • 802.11 REG SC emails: http://www.ieee802.org/11/email/stds-802-11-reg/ • Mentor documents for download: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/documents • Select “REG SC” under groups to view only Regulatory Standing Committee documents Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  7. Background • FCC allocated 75MHz of spectrum in the 5.9GHz band (5850-5925MHz) for Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) in October 1999 •  In FCC NPRM 13-22 (13-49), the FCC requested comments on a potential sharing of the DSRC band, to understand if a feasible sharing solution that protects DSRC users could be developed. • DSRC would remain as a primary user of the band • The new band would be designated U-NII-4 • 802.11ac could be modified to operate in this new UNII-4 band if approved by the FCC • FCC did not specify the framework or etiquette by which band sharing would occur Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  8. Work to date Objectives of the group Create a document that describes and quantifies possible coexistence mechanisms between DSRC and extensions of the 802.11 base standard in the proposed UNII-4 band, if the FCC allows such band sharing in a future R&O. Possible work items    > Review of ITS/DSRC field trials    > Review of work to date on coexistence > Presentations on use cases > Presentation of possible coexistence approaches    > Modeling/simulation of possible coexistence approaches    > Testing, field trials, and presentation of results from proposed prototype approaches Final report > Includes outputs from all work items > One or more “snapshots” (summary of work to date) will be provided to FCC * First snapshot from in mid-January sent to FCC after January 802.11 meeting Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  9. Old Business 3.1 DSRC Coexistence Tiger Team Final Report (Draft) 14/1596r0 – update • Comment collection spreadsheet sent out • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-1598-00-0reg-comment-collection-spreadsheet-for-dsrc-coex-tt-final-report.xls • Tentative due date: January 9 (can be extended) • Section on European regulatory in process • Won’t be completed until after the first of the year Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  10. New Business • DSRC Coexistence Tiger Team Final Report: Straw Poll questions – Jim Lansford (CSR) Attached to this slide deck These are just suggestions – can be edited or deleted • Proposal: Build database of everyone who has attended a DSRC Coexistence TT call up to 19 Dec 2014 • List will be available for review • Only participants will be able to vote in the straw poll • Straw poll questions will be put in a SurveyMonkey online poll • Response will be recorded by respondent email address • Responses published by name? Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  11. Remaining agenda items • Future call plans December 26: CANCELLED January 2: CANCELLED January 9: Possible meeting (IEEE meeting is following week) January 16: CANCELLED Other business Adjourn Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  12. Straw poll question #1 Objective of the Tiger Team: “Create a document that describes and quantifies possible coexistence mechanisms between DSRC and extensions of the 802.11 base standard in the proposed UNII-4 band, if the FCC allows such band sharing in a future R&O.” Do you believe that sharing of the 5.9GHz ITS band should be allowed? • Yes • No • Needs more study • No opinion Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  13. Straw poll question #2 Regarding the proposal in document 13/994r0 by Peter Ecclesine of Cisco Systems https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-0994-00-0reg-proposal-for-u-nii-4-devices.docx {additional links?} Do you believe this proposed band sharing technique has merit and, after developing a more complete definition and field testing, should be considered a basis for a band sharing solution? • Yes • No • Not enough information/needs more study • No opinion Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  14. Straw poll question #3 Regarding the proposal in document 13/1449r2 by Tevfik Yucek of Qualcomm (and others) https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-1449-02-0reg-proposal-for-dsrc-band-coexistence.pptx {additional links?} Do you believe this proposed band sharing technique has merit and, after developing a more complete definition and field testing, should be considered a basis for a band sharing solution? • Yes • No • Not enough information/needs more study • No opinion Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  15. Straw poll question #4 Which proposal do you support for further specification development and field testing? • The 13/994r0 proposal by Ecclesine [1] • The 13/1449r2 proposal by Yucek [1] • I support a combination of both proposals with additional details added • I believe further study of both proposals independently is needed • Neither – I do not support any band sharing • While I support band sharing, I do not believe either approach can form the basis for an acceptable band sharing solution – we need something different Note 1: Both proposals will need additional development before field testing Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  16. Straw poll question #5 If it would enhance band sharing, would you support a proposal to move the V2V Safety Channel (currently in Channel 172) to one of the upper channels (180, 182, or 184)? (Note: this could require a rule change) • Yes • No • Not enough information • I don’t support band sharing • No opinion Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  17. Straw poll question #6 • Would you support a proposal to use one of the upper channels (180/182/184) for BSM traffic instead of Channel 172? (No rule change. Part 95 still applies to Channel 172. Channel 172 would be shared with Part 15 devices) • Yes • No • Not enough information • I don’t support band sharing • No opinion Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  18. Straw poll question #7 • If band sharing is allowed, would you prefer that the upper edge of the U-NII4 band be at 5.925 GHz (all 75MHz) or 5.895 GHz (only the lower 45MHz)? • Only lower 45MHz • All 75MHz • No opinion • I do not support band sharing All 75MHz Lower 45MHz DSRC Band DSRC Channels 173 177 161 165 169 173 177 80MHz 80MHz Wi-Fi Channels 160MHz Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  19. Straw poll question #8 • If sharing is only allowed in the lower 45MHz portion of the band (5850-5895MHz), should DSRC only use 20MHz channels in that shared portion of the band? (Note: Channels 172 & 178 in Part 95 are defined as 10MHz in bandwidth, so a rule change may be required) • Yes – only 20MHz DSRC channels in the shared band • No – DSRC should use 10MHz channels • No opinion • I do not support band sharing Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  20. References • FCC NPRM 13-22 (changes to 5GHz band rules, including proposed UNII-4 band): • http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0220/FCC-13-22A1.pdf • FCC 13-22 Comments • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-0444-01-0reg-fcc-13-49-comment.docx • FCC 13-22 Reply Comment framework document • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-0661-00-0reg-fcc-13-49-reply-comment-framework.doc • FCC 13-22 Comments survey • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-0679-00-0reg-fcc-13-49-comment-survey.docx • FCC 13-22 Reply Comments • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.18/dcn/13/18-13-0087-04-0000-draft-reply-comments-of-ieee-802-re-5-ghz-nprm-fcc-et-13-49.docx • Letter to FCC OET from IEEE 802 regarding DSRC Coexistence Tiger Team activities • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.18/dcn/14/18-14-0007-02-0000-dsrc-coexistence-tt-status-letter-to-oet.docx • DSRC Summary • http://secs.oakland.edu/~gpcorser/vanet-kenny-DSRC.pdf Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

  21. References (2/2) • IEEE 802.11 submissions on DSRC (since 802.11p was ratified) • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-0552-00-0wng-802-11p-dsrc-and-802-11ac-coexistence.ppt • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-0541-01-0wng-dsrc-applications-tutorial.pptx • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-0543-01-0wng-dsrc-support-information.pptx • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-0994-00-0reg-proposal-for-u-nii-4-devices.docx • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-1276-00-0reg-proposal-for-sharing-in-unii-4-band.pptx • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-1309-00-0reg-harmful-interference-to-dsrc-systems.pptx • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-1360-00-0reg-dsrc-per-versus-rss-profiles.pptx • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-1449-02-0reg-proposal-for-dsrc-band-coexistence.pptx • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-0225-00-0reg-use-cases-for-dsrc-coexistence.ppt • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-0259-00-0reg-v2v-radio-channel-models.ppt • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-0532-00-0reg-cca-issues-for-dsrc-coexistence.ppt • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-0550-00-0reg-world-spectrum-sharing.ppt • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-0728-00-0reg-communication-and-data-movement-in-connected-vehicles.ppt • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-0819-00-0reg-technical-discussion-on-re-channelization-proposal-for-dsrc-band-coexistence.pptx • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-1044-00-0reg-its-politeness-measures.docx Jim Lansford, CSR Technology

More Related