1 / 7

Getting Past Denial — The High Cost of Health Care in the United States

Getting Past Denial — The High Cost of Health Care in the United States. Jason M. Sutherland, Ph.D., Elliott S. Fisher, M.D., M.P.H., and Jonathan S. Skinner, Ph.D. http://healthcarereform.nejm.org/?p=1739&query=TOC. From Medicare data Sick people require far more care than healthy people.

Download Presentation

Getting Past Denial — The High Cost of Health Care in the United States

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GettingPast Denial — The High Cost of Health Carein the United States Jason M. Sutherland, Ph.D., Elliott S. Fisher, M.D., M.P.H., and Jonathan S. Skinner, Ph.D. http://healthcarereform.nejm.org/?p=1739&query=TOC

  2. From Medicare data • Sick people require far more care than healthy people. • Poor people require more care than rich people.

  3. Individual and Regional Factors • Contribution of individual and regional factors to the regional differences in price-adjusted health care spending. • Survey respondents were categorized into five equal-sized quintiles on the basis of the average intensity of care in their region (www.dartmouthatlas.org ).

  4. Regional Differences • Regional differences in poverty and income explain almost none of the variation. • Health status does matter — it accounts for $593 of the $3,280 difference between the lowest- and highest-intensity regions, or just about 18%. • But that leaves more than 70% of the differences in spending that cannot be explained away by the claim that “my patients are poorer or sicker.”

  5. Utilization Rates

  6. How do we define C*? The Economics - Argument MB • Some of the care “must” be unnecessary. • Outpatient v. Inpatient care. • Watchful waiting v. expensive tests. MB, MC MC C* Care

  7. The Economics - Argument MB • If C* is correct then we have losses if we have “too little” or “too much” care. • Consider C1 or C2. MB, MC Too Little MC Too Much • Authors argue (implicitly) that if C* is “correct” and everything else is too much, we could save a lot of money and spend it on other things. C2 C* C1 Care

More Related