1 / 71

Project Review Committee Refresher

Agenda. Why CPARB and PRC were formed Phil LovellRole of CPARB and PRC Eric SmithEvaluation Criteria ReviewGC/CM Certification/Re-certification Linneth Riley-HallDesign Build Certification/Re-certification Penny KoalGC/CM Project Application Rick BennerDesign Build Project Applicatio

evers
Download Presentation

Project Review Committee Refresher

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. Project Review Committee Refresher/Orientation Presentation July 28, 2011 PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    2. Agenda Why CPARB and PRC were formed – Phil Lovell Role of CPARB and PRC – Eric Smith Evaluation Criteria Review GC/CM Certification/Re-certification – Linneth Riley-Hall Design Build Certification/Re-certification – Penny Koal GC/CM Project Application – Rick Benner Design Build Project Application – Tom Peterson Appeal Process – Tom Peterson Assignment of Panels – Tom Peterson Role of PRC Chairs/Conducting a Hearing – Rodger Benson Appropriate/Inappropriate Areas for Questions – Tom Peterson PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    3. Agenda Why CPARB and PRC were formed – Phil Lovell Role of CPARB and PRC – Eric Smith Evaluation Criteria Review GC/CM Certification/Re-certification – Linneth Riley-Hall Design Build Certification/Re-certification – Penny Koal GC/CM Project Application – Rick Benner Design Build Project Application – Tom Peterson Appeal Process – Tom Peterson Assignment of Panels – Tom Peterson Role of PRC Chairs/Conducting a Hearing – Rodger Benson Appropriate/Inappropriate Areas for Questions – Tom Peterson PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    4. Alternative Public Works Delivery Rationale Primarily: Increase Flexibility In Procurement Improve Project Delivery/Process Expediency Retain Public Confidence In Contracting Secondarily: Achieve Greater Predictability In Project(s) Outcome (Cost, Quality, Schedule) Reduce Litigious Outgrowth From Projects PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    5. RCW 39.10 Enabling Legislation- History 1991- HSB 1777- enabled 2 pilot Department Of Corrections (DOC) projects under a DOC/General Administration (GA) Project “TEAM” utilizing GC/CM methodology 1994- Codified RCW 39.10 [the “1994 Act”] Added Design/Build as alternative project delivery method Increased Public Agency eligibility list 1997- Added/modified certain provisions and sunset of 2007 2003- Job Order Contracting added 2007- Current statute with sunset of 2013 2009- Added ECCM/MCCM provisions PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    6. RCW 39.10- Alternative Public Works Oversight (Stepped progressively with legislative actions) 1995- Alternative Public Works Methods Oversight Committee (APWMOC): primarily user agencies with industry hearing/input activity and legislative staff work 2003- APWMOC terminated 2005- Capital Projects Advisory Review Board (CPARB) established and work on 39.10 continues 2007- Project Review Committee [PRC] established to review agency project and certification applications PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    7. CPARB Overview MISSION: Determine feasible and effective uses of alternative contracting procedures Qualification standards for contractors bidding on alternative public works (APW) Evaluate expansion, continuation, elimination or modification of APW contracting methods. Evaluate potential use of other alternative contracting methods PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    8. CPARB Overview MEMBERSHIP: Public Owners Architects and Engineers Contractors Subcontractors Labor MWBE Surety Legislative member representation PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    9. Questions? PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    10. Agenda Why CPARB and PRC were formed – Phil Lovell Role of CPARB and PRC – Eric Smith Evaluation Criteria Review GC/CM Certification/Re-certification – Linneth Riley-Hall Design Build Certification/Re-certification – Penny Koal GC/CM Project Application – Rick Benner Design Build Project Application – Tom Peterson Appeal Process – Tom Peterson Assignment of Panels – Tom Peterson Role of PRC Chairs/Conducting a Hearing – Rodger Benson Appropriate/Inappropriate Areas for Questions – Tom Peterson PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    11. CPARB Duties RCW 39.10.230 Policy recommendations to legislature Enhance quality, efficiency, accountability Expansion, continuation, elimination, modification of alternative Public Works methods Appoint members of the PRC Develop and administer data collection PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    12. PRC Duties RCW 39.10.250 Certify or recertify public bodies to use D-B, GC/CM or both For non-certified public bodies, review and approve use of D-B or GC/CM on projects PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    13. Certification of Public Bodies RCW 39.10.270 PRC shall determine that the public body: Has the necessary experience and qualifications to determine which projects are appropriate for alternative contracting procedures; and Has the necessary experience and qualifications to carry out the alternative contracting procedure; and Has resolved audit findings PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    14. Project Approval Process RCW 39.10.280 PRC shall determine that: Alternative procedure will provide a substantial fiscal benefit or D-B-B is not practical for quality or schedule needs; and Project meets requirements for using alternative contracting procedure per 39.10.300 (D-B) or 39.10.340 (GC/CM); and Public body has the necessary experience or qualified team to carry out the procedure; and Public body has resolved audit findings PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    15. What PRC Members Need to Know A knowledgeable review by the PRC in accordance with RCW 39.10 is of critical importance to public bodies What constitutes an experienced public body or a qualified project team Especially knowledge of RCW 39.10 processes Criteria for determining if a project qualifies RCW 39.10.300 for Design-Build RCW 39.10.340 for GC/CM PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    16. Panel Members Responsibilities The panel member shall Individually read the applicant’s Application for Project Approval Develop any clarifying questions and submit them to the panel chair, within the time frame noted in the email from Robyn Hofstad Participate on the panel During the Q&A session ask succinct questions, do not pontificate During the panel deliberations do not ask any more questions of the applicant and direct your discussion to your fellow panelists Complete the Application Evaluation Sheet PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    17. Questions? PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    18. Agenda Why CPARB and PRC were formed – Phil Lovell Role of CPARB and PRC – Eric Smith Evaluation Criteria Review GC/CM Certification/Re-certification – Linneth Riley-Hall Design Build Certification/Re-certification – Penny Koal GC/CM Project Application – Rick Benner Design Build Project Application – Tom Peterson Appeal Process – Tom Peterson Assignment of Panels – Tom Peterson Role of PRC Chairs/Conducting a Hearing – Rodger Benson Appropriate/Inappropriate Areas for Questions – Tom Peterson PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    19. Certifying Agencies for GC/CM RCW 39.10.270 Project review committee — Certification of public bodies. A public body may apply for certification to use the design-build or general contractor/construction manager contracting procedure, or both. Once certified, a public body may use the contracting procedure for which it is certified on individual projects with a total project cost over ten million dollars without seeking committee approval. The certification period is three years. A public body seeking certification for the general contractor/construction manager procedure must demonstrate successful management of at least one general contractor/construction manager project within the previous five years. PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    20. (3) To certify a public body, the committee shall determine that the public body: (a) Has the necessary experience and qualifications to determine which projects are appropriate for using alternative contracting procedures; (b) Has the necessary experience and qualifications to carry out the alternative contracting procedure including, but not limited to: Project delivery knowledge and experience; personnel with appropriate construction experience; a management plan and rationale for its alternative public works projects; demonstrated success in managing public works projects; the ability to properly manage its capital facilities plan including, but not limited to, appropriate project planning and budgeting experience; and the ability to meet requirements of this chapter; and (c) Has resolved any audit findings on previous public works projects in a manner satisfactory to the committee. PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    21. GC/CM Certifications To date Washington State University (7/26/07) City of Seattle (1/23/08) University of Washington (7/26/07) City of Tacoma (2/26/2009) PRC Orientation/Refresher Meeting July 28, 2011

    22. Re-certification Why Recertify?

More Related