1 / 18

NIH Peer Review Process – Grant Renewal

NIH Peer Review Process – Grant Renewal. Angela Y Ng, MBA, PhD Scientific Review and Referral Officer Center for Scientific Review NCI DCB New Grantee Workshop March 12, 2104. National Institutes of Health. Office of the Director. National Institute on Aging. National Institute

evelyn
Download Presentation

NIH Peer Review Process – Grant Renewal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NIH Peer Review Process – Grant Renewal Angela Y Ng, MBA, PhD Scientific Review and Referral Officer Center for Scientific Review NCI DCB New Grantee Workshop March 12, 2104

  2. National Institutes of Health Office of the Director National Institute on Aging National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases National Cancer Institute Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases National Institute on Drug Abuse National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences National Eye Institute National Institute of General Medical Sciences National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute National Human Genome Research Institute National Institute of Mental Health National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke National Institute of Nursing Research National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine National Library of Medicine National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities John E. Fogarty International Center National Center for Advancing Translational Research Clinical Center Center for Information Technology Center for Scientific Review

  3. NIH Peer Review System for Grant Applications First Level of Review Scientific Review Group (Study Section) • Second Level of Review • NIH Institute/Center Council

  4. Submitting Your Renewal Application(Identify FOA  Link to Grants.govto download Grant Application Package  Follow the SF424 (R&R) Application Guides)

  5. Review Assignment for Your Renewal R01 Application Default: same study section where your funded grant was reviewed, unless: • Study section no longer exists • Submit to a Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) with special review arrangements • Study section member now named in your renewal application • Cover letter request for different study section (if appropriate)

  6. Sample Cover Letter Please assign this Phase I SBIR “Drugs for Retinoblastoma Treatment” (RFA-CS-00-000) to the following: Institutes/Centers National Cancer Institute National Eye Institute Scientific Review Group Oncology Translational and Clinical IRG Please do not assign this application to the following: Scientific Review Group Biological Chemistry and Macromolecular Biophysics This study focuses on a new in vitro model for testing drugs for treatment of retinoblastoma, notthe synthesis of new chemotherapeutic agents.

  7. Reviewing Your Renewal R01 Application – Part 1 Review includes: • Copy of your application as submitted, including Progress Report(in “Research Strategy”) & Progress Report Publication List(attachment) • Copy of summary statement for the funded grant • Critique: • Renewals – “the committee will consider the progress made in the last funding period.” • Resubmitted Renewals – the committee will consider progress AND “evaluate the application as now presented, taking into consideration the responses to comments from the previous scientific review group and changes made to the project.”

  8. Reviewing Your Renewal R01 Application – Part 2 Review does NOTinclude: • Notice of Grant Award (NGA) • Previous grant application • Progress Reports from non-competing years • New/Early Stage Investigator (NI/ESI) consideration

  9. Do I have to Submit my Renewal as a Renewal? You can submit your renewal as new BUT: • You are unable to include a progress report. • Your application may be withdrawn if aims are too similar to funded grant. • Your subsequent renewal application, if any, will be blocked if aims of that application are too similar to this new one. • You may change your project title in your renewal

  10. Some Key Definitions: • Activity Code (three character codes used to differentiate the wide variety of research related programs supported by NIH. (Examples: R01, R21, R03, etc.) • Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) include both RFAs and Program Announcements • RFA (Request for Applications) will be numbered like this: RFA-CA-13-020 • Program Announcements (PA/PAR/PAS) will be numbered like this: PA-13-302, PAR-13-146, etc.

  11. Problem: My A1 is not funded, what do I do? Talk to your Program Director! • Option #1: Keep the Science and find a new way to submit it (e.g., change grant activity code, submit to RFA) • Option #2: Change the Science and submit a new application using the same activity code • Option #3: Wait 37 months since the first (A0) submission and submit as new (NIH Guide: NOT-OD-10-140).

  12. Option #1: Apply for a Different Type of Grant There is no limit to the amount of overlap if you apply for a different type of grant once you have your summary statement from the last review in hand. Examples: Change Grant Activity Code • Take a strong aim/aims from your R01 and submit as an R21 (relevant FOA required) • Submit your R01 aims for another similar-sized grant, such as a component in P01, U01 (relevant FOA required) or response to specific RFA.

  13. Option #2: Change the Science • NIH will not accept similar grant applications with essentially the same research • This policy applies to all NIH funding activities. • The same criteria are used to evaluate overlap of new vs. funded, new vs. resubmission, and concurrently submitted applications. • Non-compliant applications identified by NIH at any stage of the process (referral, peer review, program/grants management) will be withdrawn. See NIH Guide: NOT-OD-09-100& CSR <Applicant Resources> <Receipt and Referral>

  14. A New Application… • Is substantially different in content and scope • Has more significant differences than are normally encountered in a resubmitted application • Includes substantial changes, particularly in the Specific Aims and the Research Strategy sections • Has fundamental changes in the questions being asked and/or the outcomes being examined • Includes changes to the Research Plan that should produce a significant change in direction and approach for the research project outcomes examined See NIH Guide: NOT-OD-09-100& CSR <Applicant Resources> <Receipt and Referral>

  15. Other Options / Scenarios • Scenario 1: My R01 research really took off and now I have enough data to support 2 R01 applications! • Submit one as new and one as your renewal so long as the aims do not overlap. • Scenario 2: I am making good progress and I would like to apply for an additional grant to fund a new direction. • Submit your R01 renewal and think about applying for a small grant award, like R03 or R21, so long as the aims do not overlap. • Scenario 3: I am seeking additional funds for a current award to cover increased costs (noncompeting) or to expand the scope of the work (competing) • Submit a type 3 Supplement application (Revision application)

  16. Early Career Reviewer (ECR) Program • Train and educate qualified scientists without significant prior review experience so that they may develop into critical and well trained reviewers • Help emerging researchers advance their careers by exposing them to review experience that may make them more competitive as applicants • Enrich the existing pool of NIH reviewers by recruiting scientists from less research-intensive institutions as well as those from traditionally research-intensive institutions. Information available at www.csr.nih.gov/ECR

  17. Requirements for Being an ECR Responsibilities of an ECR Participate in reviewer training Review 2 to 4 grant applications and provide written critiques Attend study section meeting Participates in no more than one study section per year and no more than twice total • Full-time faculty member or researcher • Has an active independent research program • At least 2 recent senior authored research publications • Has not yet been a reviewer at CSR • Prior research funding not required Information available at www.csr.nih.gov/ECR

  18. Key NIH Review and Grants Web Sites NIH Center for Scientific Review http://www.csr.nih.gov NIH Office of Extramural Research http://grants.nih.gov/

More Related