1 / 15

Rubrics

Rubrics. Our Friends in Connecting Learning and Assessment….Really!. Chatterji, Madhabi. (2003). Designing and using tools for educational assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Gronlund, N.E. (2003). Assessment of student achievement 7th ed . Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

enid
Download Presentation

Rubrics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rubrics Our Friends in Connecting Learning and Assessment….Really!

  2. Chatterji, Madhabi. (2003). Designing and using tools for educational assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. • Gronlund, N.E. (2003). Assessment of student achievement 7th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. • Oosterhoff, A. (2003). Developing and using classroom assessments 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ; Merrill Prentice Hall. • . • Stiggins, R.J., Arter, J.A., Chappuis, J.& Chappuis, S. (2004). Classroom assessment for student learning. Portland, OR; Assessment Training Institute. • Wiggens, G. & McTighe. (2001). Understanding by design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall

  3. Rule #1: Don’t make rubrics for no reason. Use only for complex, rich measurement Use only if students will use rubrics as tools to develop their abilities – to self-assess and get better Use only to define quality

  4. Compare and Contrast or the rest is futile • Directions • Checklist • Rating Scale • Rubric

  5. Rubrics and Scoring Criteria can be… • Holistic • Trait-analytic • Weighted • Critical Domain

  6. Standards-based Assignment-based Generic Genre-specific Longitudinal Subject specific Rubrics can be designed to be..

  7. Rubric Geography

  8. Rubric Language…. • Levels • Absolute standard • Anchors • Empirical Descriptors • Comparative Descriptors • Parallel construction • Exemplars

  9. Dr. Wiggins says….. • Good Rubrics…. • Discriminate among performances validly • Do not combine criteria in domains • Provide useful description • Are valid • Are reliable • Rely on descriptive language

  10. Dr. Wiggins also says…. • Good rubrics • Do not mandate • Process • Format • Methods or approach • Good rubrics do not rely on orthodoxy or taste, and they are not built based on mediocrity, and they do not reward “good faith/effort.”

  11. What’s the difference? • Between trait-analytic and holistic? • Use holistic for the work as a whole • Use trait analytic when each component can be separately addressed • Between weighted and critical domain? • Use weighted when each domain is of different importance • Use critical domain if each is essential

  12. Good Rubrics • Clear to user • Distinct differences between criteria • Fair and Accurate • Do not define what should not be done • Never use negative terms…not quite, not always, only part of the time…

  13. Bad Rubrics • Count • Use irrelevant criteria • Dictate format • Use good, better, best… • Aim to enable good grades regardless of quality

  14. Building Rubrics • Decide what is important • Decide what standard-level looks like • Decide what acceptable looks like

  15. The Rest is up to you…… • The Rest is up to you……

More Related