1 / 21

Critical facilities for active participation in learning networks

Critical facilities for active participation in learning networks. Hans Hummel, Colin Tattersall, Daniel Burgos, Francis Brouns, Hub Kurvers & Rob Koper Educational Technology Expertise Centre Open University of the Netherlands WBC 2005 (February 25th, 2005). Context and approach.

emery
Download Presentation

Critical facilities for active participation in learning networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Critical facilities for active participation in learning networks Hans Hummel, Colin Tattersall, Daniel Burgos, Francis Brouns, Hub Kurvers & Rob Koper Educational Technology Expertise Centre Open University of the Netherlands WBC 2005 (February 25th, 2005)

  2. Context and approach • Technology Development Program: Learning Networks (2003-2008) (extra) • Initial experiences with pilot implementations of LN architecture, i.e. LN4LD pilot 1 (paper) -Information ecology perspective -OSOSS: facilities for (active) participation • Incentive mechanisme LN4LD pilot 2 (extra)

  3. Learning Networks use technology to network learners, institutions and learning objects in such a way that the network can self-organise Learning Networks (LNs) are two-mode networks represented as a graph with nodes, where the nodes are ‘LN members’ and ‘Activity Nodes’ (ANs) ANs can be anything that is available to support learning, such as a course, a workshop, a conference, a lesson, an internet learning resource, et cetera Central to the notion of a Learning Network is the idea that all participants are in a position to contribute, within the constraints of any policies that may be operating

  4. Position, target, learning route

  5. Platform pilots • Base reqs: open source, java based, ‘open pedagogy’ • (out of scope for pilot) general portal with LNs • Each LN modelled, e.g. in PHP Nuke • Each AN modelled, e.g. in Moodle (including services) • LN ‘seeded’ with initial set of ANs to get things going • LN further supposed to develop / emerge through contributions & ratings

  6. Objectives LN4LD pilots have three objectives: • To gain early feedback on functional, technical and organisational aspects of creating and maintaining a learning network • To help meet the demand for further information on IMS Learning Design from those wishing to understand the specification, or who are engaged in its application (UNFOLD project) • To investigate incentive mechanisms which stimulate learners to move beyond mere consumption of learning materials towards active participation in the creation of learning experiences

  7. LN-layer (Nuke)

  8. AN layer: Moodle

  9. EML site (eml.org): increase in participants

  10. LN site (learningnetworks.org): increase in participants

  11. Forum Posts Posts made by originators News 59 58 IMS LD + EML 74 57 Standardization 9 7 Valkenburg Group 8 5 Alfanet 3 3 LN site: some participation data (all forums)

  12. Threads Repl Views LD-online testing site 2 245 Environments definition 2 412 Referencing external Units of Learning 4 952 IMS LD + MD: taxonomies and vocabularies 1 469 Upcoming workshops 0 305 Help 2 558 6th Framework Coord. Action: UNFOLD 0 438 IMS-LD Editor Announcement 0 549 LN site: some participation data (example forum)

  13. LN4LD pilot 1 (june-sept 2004): increase in participants

  14. LN4LD pilot 1: some participation data • Participants: 104 registered, but 58 never accessed; 20 regular visitors • Passive: 21,011 page views, 427 downloads • Active: 24 post in general forums (Nuke); 24 posts in course forums (Moodle)

  15. LN4LD pilot 1: Lessons learned • Transparent Policies: e.g. lower threshold • Better Usability: e.g. Nuke out • Less Structure: e.g. less fora • Explicit Reward: e.g. mechanism for extra access

  16. LN4LD pilot 2 (oct ’04 – jan ’05): reward system • (Because of time and technical constraints) simple interrupted time series design with removal consecutive treatments => flexible within the life time of the learning network • First treatment: incentive mechanism for extra access • Quantitative + qualitative points to be earned for contributing (posting, replying, rating) • Extra access to ‘runnable examples of UoL’ in CopperCore beyond threshold level of points

  17. LN4LD pilot 2 (increased contribution)

  18. Thank you for your attention!URL (LN4LD) http://www.unfoldproject.net:8085/UNFOLD/designers/email hans.hummel@ou.nlAny questions?

More Related