1 / 43

The New Economic Geography : an overview

The New Economic Geography : an overview. COST Action IS1104 Urbino 18-19 Settembre 2012. Outline. Introduction Krugman’s cookbook : main ingredients of NEG models Krugman’s story: self- reinforcing agglomeration NEG Families, modifications and extensions Research questions.

elton
Download Presentation

The New Economic Geography : an overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The New EconomicGeography:an overview COST Action IS1104 Urbino 18-19 Settembre 2012

  2. Outline • Introduction • Krugman’scookbook: mainingredients of NEG models • Krugman’s story: self-reinforcingagglomeration • NEG Families, modifications and extensions • Researchquestions

  3. Section I Introduction

  4. Fujita and Krugman: • “The defining issue of the new economic geography is how to explain the formation of a large variety of economic agglomeration (or concentration) in geographical space. Agglomeration or the clustering of economic activity occurs at many geographical levels, having a variety of compositions.

  5. For example, one type of agglomeration arises when small shops and restaurants are clustered in a neighborhood. • Other types of agglomeration can be found in the formation of cities, all having different sizes, ranging from New York to Little Rock; in the emergence of a variety of industrial districts; or in the existence of strong regional disparities within the same country. • At the other extreme of the spectrum lies the core-periphery structure of the global economy corresponding to the North-South dualism.

  6. It is also important to notice that all this types of agglomeration at different levels are embedded in a larger economy, altogether forming a complex system.” (Fujita and Krugman, 2004, Papers in Regional Science)

  7. The aim of the Action is to provide a betterunderstanding of the EU as a complex, multi-level, evolvinggeographicalsystem, takingdulyinto account the dynamicprocessesoccuringwithinsuch a system and to developimprovedstrategies for EU regionalpolicies

  8. NEG Central question • How does the spatialdistribution of industrial activity look like in the long-run? • Equallydistributedamongregions • Agglomerated in oneregion • Unevenlydistributed over the regions

  9. Section II KruGman’sCoookBook: MainIngrEdients OF NEG MODELS

  10. General Equilibrium Model (2 x 2 x 2) • 2 symmetric and spatially homogeneous regions • 2 sectors (M)anufacturing and (A)griculture A perfect competion ; M imperfect competition • Two factors of production (mobile and immobile) • Full interdependence across (goods and labour) markets

  11. Increasing returns and imperfect competition • Dixit-Stiglitz monopolistic competition • No interaction / identical firms • Product differentiation/market segmentation • Production technology: a fixed component determines decreasing average cost • Price: constant mark-up over marginal costs • Larger production implies higher profit

  12. Consumer’s preferences • Cobb-Douglas preferences across M and A goods (fixed shares of income allocated to each sector) • CES preferences across M varieties (love for variety) • Cheaper and/or more numerous goods increase welfare

  13. Distance and trade • Iceberg transportcosts (Samuelson, 1952, Economic Journal) • Transportcost: exogenousparameterthatincreasespriceatdestination • For notationalconvenience «tradefreenessparameter (between 0 and 1)» • Tradeisbeneficialbecauseitallowsaccess to otherregionalmarkets • However, location isalsoimportantsinceprofits are higherwherethe local market isbigger (lowertransportcosts)

  14. Factor mobility • Induced by differentials in factor rewards (wages, profits) • The dynamicprocess of migration/relocationisgradual over time and adaptive • Typically in continuous time • Link between short and long-runanalysis • Migration determines the long termspatialallocation of economicactivities (the regional shares; whereas the overallamount of productivefactorsisgiven)

  15. Section III Krugman’s Story: Self reinforcingagglomeration

  16. Pivotal: Size of local market for a single firmdepends: • Overall market size in the region (increasesit) • Number of firms in the region (reducesit)

  17. Thoughtexperiment • onefactorunit (i.e. manufacturing workers) and the correspondingfirmmove from region 1 to region 2 • Overallsize of the market in 1 increases - • Market-access or market-sizeeffect (agglomeration force):monopolisticfirms locate in the largest market whereaverage production costislower and factorrewards are higher • Number of firmsincreases in 1 aswell - • Cost of living effect (agglomeration force): the local production increases and goods are cheaper • Market crowding or market competitioneffect (spreading force): firms locate in regions with less competitors

  18. Self-reinforcingprocess 1 • Demandlinkedcircularcausality The productive factor and its owner move together:

  19. Self-reinforcingprocess2 • Cost-linkedcircularcausality The productive factor and its owner move together

  20. Stabilizing force • Competionbetweenfirms

  21. Ifagglomerationforcesexceeddispersionforces. Thisleads to full agglomeration Ifdispersionforcesexceedagglomerationforcesthisleads to symmetricdistribution

  22. z

  23. SectionIV NEG Families, Modifications and Extensions

  24. NEG families: differentiated according to which factor is interregionally mobile • Main NEG Variants: most used in the literature • Non exhaustive taxonomy of existing modifications and extensions

  25. NEG Families • Core-Periphery (CP) model (Krugman, 1991, JPE) mobile factor: manufacturing workers immobile factor: agricultural workers technology: M workers both variable and fixed component • Footloose entrepreneur (FE) model (Forslid & Ottaviano, 2003, JEG) mobile factor: entrepreneurs/human capital immobile factor: unskilled workers production technology: entrepreneur only fixed component (simpler) • Footloose capital (FC) model (Martin & Rogers, 1995, JIE) mobile factor: physical capital immobile factor: workers technology : physical capital entersonlyfixed component (simpler) no circularcausality (muchsimpler)

  26. NEG mainvariants • Constructed capital (CC) model (Baldwin, 1999, EER) - mobile or immobile endogenous physical capital - circularcausality via capital construction and destruction maylead to growth (growthpoles / growthsinks) • Vertical linkages (VL) model (Venables, 1996, IER) - intermediate manufacturing goodsenter in production - circularcausality via demand and supplylinkages (supplier of intermediate inputs locate in larger output markets/ firms locate where the number of supplier of intermediate inputsislargerand production costslower) • Global and local spillovers (GS and LS) models (Martin & Ottaviano, 1999, EER; Baldwin, Martin and Ottaviano, 2001, JE Growth) - variants of the CC model thatallow for endogeousgrowth - localspillovers are a dispersion force

  27. Taxonomy of extensions 1

  28. Taxonomy of extensions 1

  29. Taxonomy of extensions 2

  30. Taxonomy of extensions 2

  31. Section V ResearCHQuestions

  32. Researchtopic 1 • To represent the economy as a multi-regional Network with more ‘realistic’ features. Suggested preliminary steps: • Search for the most suitable analytical framework • Identification of EU regional specificities (also through data collection, screening and analysis) • Identification of the network structure (type of links, strength and number of connections) • Implementation of a specific software for the discovery of the network nature and statistical properties • Simulation exercises and comparison with real data

  33. Researchtopic 2 • To model more elaborated firm relocation decisions (in NEG modelsverysimplistic). Improvements (drawingalso from contributions by Dawid;Zou): • Can welearnsomethingfrom the behaviouralliterature on strategicswithching in (financial) markets (chartist vs fundamentalists, discrete choicemodels, replicatordynamics, experiment on learning, new experiments on spatialdecisions)? • Can welearnsomething from the much more elaborate modelling of IO (strategicinteraction, heterogeneousfirm, continuousspace)? • Can we incorporate financialmarkets and itsrole in the firm (re-)location decision?

  34. Researchtopic 3 • To identify determinants of regional attractiveness not included in NEG models. • for a firm several factors (such as local government quality, crime rates, access to credit, legislation, degree of scholarization of the workforce and so on) may affect relocation. • Similarly, factorsdifferent from wages or remunerationsthatmayaffectworkersand human capital migration are various (provision of public servicies, housingprices, amenities, work environment, and so on) • These indicators can be very useful for a better understanding of the distribution of economic activities.

  35. Researchtopic 4 • Literaturereviews: • To provide an exhaustivetaxonomy of the NEG literature. • To compare old and new approaches to geographicaleconomics

  36. Thankyou for yourattention!

More Related