330 likes | 410 Views
Explore how college majors shape values related to family, career, and society, influencing life decisions. Analyze the causal relationship between values and major choices. Available at the link provided.
E N D
“College Major and Preferences: The Case of Religion”+“Education and Values: Family, Careers and Society”Miles KimballColter MitchellArland ThorntonLinda Young-DeMarcoUniversity of Michigan All authors contributed substantially to this paper, and names are listed alphabetically to reflect the substantial contribution of each. Paper available at http://paa2006.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=60182
Higher education is associated with attitudes towards • Individual achievement • Marriage and intergenerational relationships • Divorce, cohabitation, and childbearing • Careers, fulfillment, and community service • Religion
Focus of Research • Causal Relationships • College Major Values
Focus of Research • Causal Relationships • College Major Values
Focus of Research • Reciprocal Causal Relationships • College Major Values
Theory • Three Streams of Thought: • Science • Developmentalism • Postmodernism
Science • Alternative authority structure • Alternative view of life and purpose • God not necessary for explaining life • Humans related to animals • Mind=Brain (neurological explanations of spiritual experience) • Little room in Physics for an immortal soul separate from the body.
Developmentalism • Narrative of progress: • Individual over family • Materialism • Equality and Freedom
Postmodernism • Rejection of absolute or universal standards • Epistemological doubt • Social and political power determines what counts as true and right.
Two Fundamental Hypotheses • Hypotheses 1: College major will influence values concerning family, careers, and society • Hypothesis 2: Values will influence the choice of college major
Monitoring the Future • High school seniors in the United States • The baseline interview takes place during senior year (Time 0) • Time 1 is one or two years after high school • Time 3 is five or six years after high school
How Important Is… (4pt scale) • Family • Having a good marriage and family life • Being able to give my children better opportunities than I've had • Living close to parents and relatives • Career • Being successful in my line of work • Having lots of money • Being able to find steady work • Society • Working to correct social and economic inequalities • Making a contribution to society • Finding purpose and meaning in my life
College Major Categories • Natural Science • Social Science • Humanities • Other/Undecided • No College • “Trades” (clerical, vocational/technical, business, education, and engineering)
Controls • Year of initial survey (1976-1995) • Region • Gender • Parental education • Political preferences and beliefs • Religion
Analyses • College Major Values
Figure 1Measurement and Structural Effects Model of Personal Values
Equations • Substantive equations • Measurement equations
Table 3Predicting Time 3 Attitude from Time 1 Attitude and College Major at Time 1 LISREL Models (Z – ratios in parentheses) N=4173
Analyses • Values College Major • College major stability • Choosing a new college major
Table 4 Predicting the Stability of Time1 College Majors Through Time3 for the Time1 Attitude (Z-Ratios in Parentheses) N=4173
Table 5Multinomial Logistic Regressions Predicting the Time3 College Major from the Time1 Attitude for Individuals in College at Time1 Who Indicated a Change in College Major by Time3(Trades is the Omitted Category) (Z-ratios in Parentheses) (N=888)
Summary and Conclusions • College major changes values • Values affect college major choice • Strong causal nexus between values and major life decisions
Table 3Predicting Time 3 Religiosity from Time 1 Religiosity and College Major at Time 1 LISREL Models (Z – ratios in parentheses)
Table 4 Predicting the Stability of Time1 College Majors Through Time3 for the Time1 Religiosity (Z-Ratios in Parentheses)
Table 5Multinomial Logistic Regressions Predicting the Time3 College Major from the Time1 Religiosity for Individuals in College at Time1 Who Indicated a Change in College Major by Time3 (Trades is the Omitted Category) (Z-ratios in Parentheses)
Multipliers:Can these effects explain social change? • Many of these ideas affect everyone, regardless of major (or not attending college)—estimates of differences in effects are a lower bound on the overall size of the effects. • These are the effects after diminishing returns • Effects bigger in the past when the ideas were newer • Effects bigger in other countries where newer • The total social effects are cumulative over time • Colleges train the cultural elites (e.g., news and entertainment elites).
Is this Economics as well as Sociology? • “Values” = Views about what people should do. • What people think they should do has a big effect on what they actually do. Thus, people’s views about what should be done are an important preference parameter. (Akerlof) • Religion clearly influences values in this sense and a great deal of evidence shows it affects choices. Thus it affects preferences.
3 Origin Questions What determines: • The available technology? • The structure of strategic interactions? • Preferences?
Where do preferences come from? • Genes • Culture • From parents • From others
Implications of Evolution for Social Theory • In steady state, it is as if each replicating entity has a utility function it is maximizing • Organisms • Humans • Animals • Plants • Design Plans • Genes • Ideas (Dawkin’s “Memes”) • Groups • Quantitatively, group selection requires equilibrium within the group. • Out of steady state, track population dynamics.
Explaining Trends in Religiosity • More religious people have more children • Thus, in terms of transmission of religiosity from parents to children, there is selection pressure toward greater religiosity. • The only way religiosity will not trend upwards is if there is some other influence pulling religiosity down. • Simple regression to the mean? • Influence of schooling? • Influence of the media?