1 / 22

Case Study for Globally Harmonized System ( GHS) Implementation in Industry

Case Study for Globally Harmonized System ( GHS) Implementation in Industry. Prepared for NC ASSE by Stephen Wrightenberry – Intern Cree EHS Presented by Erin Hite – EHS Program Manager, Cisco Systems ASSE Chapter meeting 12/13/12. Agenda.

elpida
Download Presentation

Case Study for Globally Harmonized System ( GHS) Implementation in Industry

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Case Study for Globally Harmonized System(GHS) Implementation in Industry Prepared for NC ASSE by Stephen Wrightenberry– Intern Cree EHS Presented by Erin Hite – EHS Program Manager, Cisco Systems ASSE Chapter meeting 12/13/12

  2. Agenda • Overview of a sample plan to implement GHS in an industrial setting. • Objectives • Challenges • Plans and ideas • Will include tips and things to think about as you implement the program at your worksite. • Will not be a detailed review of the changes to the regulation (hopefully you already know the details!).

  3. GHS Modifications to the Hazard Communication System • See handout for side by side comparison of 1994 and 2012 Hazcomm regulation changes • Sections with changes: • Purpose • Scope/Application • Definitions • Hazard Classification • Written Program • Labels • Safety Data Sheets • Employee Training • Trade Secrets These directly affect employees

  4. Compliance Plan Timeline

  5. Challenges for Implementation- Training • Timing for implementation – SDSs are already becoming available everywhere, need to train employees on how to read. • Training needs to cover: • Changes to HazCom, 16-section SDS, new label requirements, new classification system, any newly identified physical or health hazards on new SDSs to include in employee training • Include new label information in training • Since there will be new Manufacturer labels – if internal labels remain the same it will be confusing for employees. • New SDS will have classification numbers that are opposite of NFPA labels that are currently in use (1 is highest hazard rather than lowest hazard) • Classification system is more complicated. Individual employees may not be able to make label choices without EHS assistance. • Pictograms – new for employees – different from numbered hazard rating

  6. Training Materials • Online Powerpoint class – required for all employees. • Updated website – with links to information and contacts for help • Posters – for work areas, gowning rooms, break rooms, bulletin boards • Badge Cards – for employees to carry • Newsletter – company wide prior to training. Sample Poster Materials from: GHS Compliance Kit KHA Online-MSDS Sample Badge Card

  7. Train on 16-Section Safety Data Sheet Focus in employee Training will be on changes to these sections • Identification of the substance or mixture and of the supplier • Hazards identification • Information on ingredients (composition) substance/mixture • First Aid Measures • Firefighting Measures • Accidental Release Measures • Handling and Storage • Exposure controls/Personal protection • Physical and Chemical Properties • Stability and Reactivity • Toxicological • Ecological Information (Non-mandatory) • Disposal Considerations (Non-mandatory) • Transport Information (Non-mandatory) • Regulatory Information (Non-mandatory) • Other information including information on preparation and revision of the SDS

  8. New Acetone SDS – Training Focus Classification and how to Interpret Chemical Identification Pictograms and what they mean Hazard Statements Handling and Prevention Response

  9. Note: EHS should be aware of differences between GHS and other regulations - Example: Flammable and Combustible ranges:

  10. Challenges for Implementation- Labels • LOTs and LOTs of labels! • Includes: squeeze bottles, equipment, tanks, hoods, buckets, beakers, jars and on and on! • Larger labels required – with inclusion of pictograms, hazard statements and other requirements. What to do with small containers? • Difficult to use preprinted labels for the multitude of chemicals (need all sizes, pictograms can’t be blank, who manages) • Manufacturer label pictograms need to be in color – determine if internal labels will follow this rule – requires specialized printers. • Finding printers made in the US to print updated labels (Printers available in the UK as of now; US is slowly transitioning printer labels over).

  11. HazCom – Workplace Labeling • New HazCom regulation allows employers to use existing workplace-specific labeling systems as long as they provide the required information. • However, existing systems may not match what will now be on manufacturer labels and on the SDS. • Leads to confusion for employees so implementing consistent format is a good idea.

  12. Example • Company is using NFPA/HMIS Labels on all non-manufacturer containers and equipment. • NFPA labels use number system to Rate the hazards. • 4 is high hazard, 1 is low hazard • GHS labels will have pictograms and hazard statement, SDS will classify using numbers • 1 is high hazard NFPA HMIS Sample GHS

  13. Modifications to Labeling System • Internal labels should have the following: • Product Identifier • Pictogram • Signal Word • Hazard Statement(s) • Other: • Precautionary Statement(s) • Manufacturer contact info

  14. HazCom Pictograms and Hazards

  15. HazCom – Example of Manufacturer’s Label BIG!! Will need glasses to read if use all this information if used on secondary containers!

  16. GHS labels – no standard format. • As you can see, the format may differ as long as the required information is present. • May need to have several options available for internal labels to accommodate container size and type of hazard.

  17. Example preprinted label • Manu. labels require red outlines for pictograms. • Blank diamonds are not permitted on a label from manufacturer, but currently ok for site labels • Might change! • Black out pictograms that are not applicable? • Need to train employees how to complete label • What to do if updated SDS is not available?

  18. Printing Options • Using in house printing will cut time in receiving labels and will also expedite the process, since labels can be designed, printed, and then posted. • Important to find a cost effective printer that can handle all necessary applications. • Would be great if integrated with existing MSDS system so labels would auto print based on specific MSDS information.

  19. Challenges for Implementation- New SDSs • MSDS online system • Costs for uploading new SDSs, • Implementing label printing module (configure information from MSDS to label, train employees on how to use) • Manpower for requesting updated SDSs from all manufacturers • What to do when you don’t have an updated SDS? (product no longer made, manufacturer out of business, outside of US etc) • Who reviews for any newly identified physical or health hazards?

  20. Classification Tables From: sigma-aldrich.com/safety-center.html This is a good reference for EHS professionals to check classifications and make label choices if MSDS is not available. http://www.labcluster.com/news4/30334_ghs_poster_eu.pdf

  21. Classification Table- Codes

  22. Questions?

More Related