1 / 7

PROJECT

PROJECT. INTEGRATE. Integrating 21 st Century Skills and Technology Into the Classroom . Michelle Peterson Beth Nelson Kari Knutson. Working Together. Flandreau Elementary Title I Reading Special Education Close Classrooms RTI Reading Groups Fluency Instruction

ellis
Download Presentation

PROJECT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PROJECT INTEGRATE Integrating 21st Century Skills and Technology Into the Classroom Michelle PetersonBeth Nelson Kari Knutson

  2. Working Together • Flandreau Elementary • Title I Reading • Special Education • Close Classrooms • RTI Reading Groups • Fluency Instruction • Similar PI Action Research Plan • Individualized vs. Group Instruction vs. Combination • What way works best?

  3. Group Instruction • What? • Fluency Cards • Fluency Phrasing Activity • Laptops • Simultaneously • Pros • Work Independently • Increased Oral Reading Fluency • Cons • Monitoring Errors

  4. Individualized Instruction • What? • Fluency Cards • Fluency Phrasing Activity • Smart! Board • One on One • Pros • Error Correction • Increased Oral Reading Fluency • Cons • Time Consuming

  5. Combination • What? • Fluency Cards • Fluency Phrasing Activity • Smart! Board • Group • Pros • Hear Each Other/Cooperative Learning • Increased Oral Reading Fluency • Cons • Relying on Each Other

  6. What We Learned • More significant increase in group instruction than in individual instruction. • Either way, the students enjoyed working with the technology and enjoyed trying to “beat” their previous scores. Group Individual Combination +37 +21 +12

  7. Questions • Was the increase in fluency because we were using phrasing or because we were using technology? • How would this work in large group settings? • Any Questions?

More Related