1 / 33

Bridging the Gap – Addressing OSSFs in Westfield Estates

Bridging the Gap – Addressing OSSFs in Westfield Estates. Justin Bower Senior Environmental Planner. Westfield Estates. Aldine-Westfield Area, unincorporated Harris County Part of Halls Bayou Watershed. Halls Bayou. West Little York. Westfield Estates Neighborhood.

ellery
Download Presentation

Bridging the Gap – Addressing OSSFs in Westfield Estates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bridging the Gap – Addressing OSSFs in Westfield Estates Justin Bower Senior Environmental Planner

  2. Westfield Estates • Aldine-Westfield Area, unincorporated Harris County • Part of Halls Bayou Watershed

  3. Halls Bayou West Little York

  4. Westfield Estates Neighborhood • Fairly dense urban area • Older (40’s/50’s) development • Never annexed to City • Mixed Land uses • Single family residential • Small businesses • Economically disadvantaged neighborhood

  5. Infrastructure Status • Community served solely by OSSFs • Old systems • Often overloaded • High failure rate • Compromised septic fields • Drainage was problem • Much pooling • Trash/debris in ditches

  6. Infrastructure Status

  7. Infrastructure Status

  8. Project History • Concern arose over high OSSF failure rate • Failing Septic System Initiative (FSSI) – Westfield is area of priority • At the time, no immediate plans for sanitary service

  9. Project History • Bacteria levels in ditches represented acute public health risk • Source information indicated: • Mix of sources • Domestic animals • Pets • Human Waste • OSSFs were prime focus for structural

  10. Project History • H-GAC worked with TCEQ to find funding to address situation • WPP model chosen, 319 grant awarded • H-GAC worked with Harris County/Pct 2, EAMD, Sunbelt FWSD, and community to create WPP

  11. Project History – WPP • Original WPP called for replacing ~250 OSSFs, other BMPs • Original cost estimates were too low • Area not well suited for OSSFs • Concern that investment would be short-lived • Stakeholders decided to pursue other approach

  12. Project History – Revised WPP • Because sanitary on horizon, less match available: • Smaller scale OSSF replacement program • Education focus • Low flow devices/pump outs • Pet waste components

  13. Project History – Implementation • However, after several rounds of review: • TCEQ/EPA decided not to pursue approval of WPP • Gave H-GAC and partners ability to begin implementation immediately • Shifted to local project

  14. Challenges to addressing OSSFs • Subdivided lots, many don’t meet minimum sizes • Multiple structures, overloaded capacities • Hindered drain fields • Many rentals • Limited funds

  15. OSSF Solutions • Four-pronged strategy • Low-flow devices to reduce overflows • Pump-outs to reduce overflows, extend system life • Homeowner/renter education • Limited replacement

  16. Low Flow Devices • Designed to reduce flow to overloaded OSSFs • Includes “non-invasive” components • Deluxe showerhead, faucet aerators, tankbags, dye tests, etc. • Disseminated by pump-out vendor, and at public meetings • Installed by resident • Doesn’t require plumbing • Personalized instructions (bilingual)

  17. Low Flow Devices

  18. OSSF Pump-outs • Marketing through mailings, parners, cross-promoted at OSSF education event, etc. • Designed to extend life of overloaded OSSFs, educate resident to maintain, help bridge gap to sanitary • Partners helped locate vendor, EAMD managed interaction/spanish language services, vendor door-to-door

  19. Residential OSSF Education • Marketing through mailings, partners, fliers, community members • Education packet contained pamphlets, etc. • Designed to introduce elements of OSSFs, impart need for maintenance, cross-promote pump-outs • H-GAC developed meeting • EAMD provided refreshment/staff, • other partners attended and supported, • AgriLife gave primary presentation.

  20. Residential OSSF Education

  21. Residential OSSF Education

  22. Targeted OSSF Replacement • Limited funding in 319 project, scaled down from original • SEP funds became available (~45,000) through HCS&WCD • Intent was targeted, income-dependant pilot program • Partners devised criteria for application • Harris County managed applications/site info • HCS&WCD managed contract • H-GAC, EAMD, Sunbelt supported efforts/meetings • Aerobic/drop irrigation systems installed

  23. Targeted OSSF Replacement

  24. Results • Low Flow Devices • 223 disseminated directly, 35+ disseminated at meetings • OSSF Pump-outs • 188 serviced in project area, 75 in greater Westfield community. Total volume of 132,000 gallons. • OSSF Education • Information disseminated to ~450 households • Event had ~45 attendees

  25. Results • OSSF Replacements • Many applicants received • Not all met criteria • Some site issues at some locations • At the end of the process, replaced 4 systems • Average cost of ~$11,000/system • Included 2-year service agreement • Deemed unfeasible to pursue further • Cost issues, site limitations

  26. In the Context of Other Efforts • Pet waste addressed through educational mailers, materials • Ditch and outfall maintenance/improvement conducted by Harris County/HCFCD during course of project • Reduced pooling • Future sanitary sewer service prioritized for area • Capacity expanded at Sunbelt plant • Funding options evaluated by EAMD/Sunbelt • Designed to complement OSSF efforts

  27. Pet Waste Mailer

  28. Evaluating Impact • Qualitative and quantitative review included: • Pre/post-implementation monitoring • Bacteria levels still high (up to millions CFU) • Not enough time between to indicate change • Greatly reduced pooling from original study • Direct discharge issues remain • Community Surveys • Dual-purpose, data gathering and education • Showed change, especially with OSSF, from start to finish

  29. Impact Evaluation Materials

  30. Impact Evaluation Monitoring

  31. Down the Road - Long Term Goals • Support EAMD, Sunbelt, et al in funding applications • Provide further education under BIG efforts • Address general area as part of Halls Ahead project for HCFCD

  32. Any Questions? Justin Bower Senior Environmental Planner Houston-Galveston Area Council 713-499-6653 Justin.bower@H-GAC.com Sunbelt Freshwater Supply District - Oakwilde Harris County Soil and Water Conservation District

More Related