1 / 33

Sorption of Radionuclides to Tuff in the Presence of Shewanella oneidensis (MR-1)

Sorption of Radionuclides to Tuff in the Presence of Shewanella oneidensis (MR-1). Sherry Faye 1 , Jen Fisher 2 , Duane Moser 2 , Ken Czerwinski 1. 1 University of Nevada, Las Vegas Radiochemistry PhD Program 2 Desert Research Institute, Las Vegas, NV. Outline.

elise
Download Presentation

Sorption of Radionuclides to Tuff in the Presence of Shewanella oneidensis (MR-1)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sorption of Radionuclides to Tuff in the Presence of Shewanella oneidensis (MR-1) Sherry Faye1, Jen Fisher2, Duane Moser2, Ken Czerwinski1 1 University of Nevada, Las Vegas Radiochemistry PhD Program 2 Desert Research Institute, Las Vegas, NV

  2. Outline • Objective, Background and Goals • Influence of bacteria on radioelement sorption • Experimental • Tuff characterization • Bacteria preparation • Sorption • Results • Conclusions • Future directions

  3. Research Objectives • Obtain data on sorption kinetics, equilibrium and fundamental surface interactions of radionuclides with tuff. • Obtain a better understanding of interactions of the Shewanella oneidensis (MR-1) culture with tuff and radionuclides.

  4. Background • Studies from literature include: • Radionuclide sorption to various rock and minerals. • Interactions of radionuclides with bacteria. • Combined systems including rocks and minerals, radionuclides and bacteria. • A combined system will be studied based on conditions at the Nevada Test Site. • Determine if bacteria can influence sorption. • Use results to evaluate against environmental conditions

  5. Research Goals • Characterize tuff. • Use scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to examine surface morphology. • Use energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) to determine elemental composition. • Use X-ray diffraction (XRD) for phase identification. • Perform sorption studies with radionuclides in the absence and presence of bacteria.

  6. Scanning Electron Microscopy Si, O, Al, K, Na Tuff, 50X

  7. X-ray Diffraction • Sanidine KAlSi3O8 • Cristobalite SiO2 • α-Quartz SiO2

  8. Bacteria Background • MR-1 can be found in diverse environments. • MR-1 can grow with or without oxygen and can use a variety of alternate electron acceptors. • Well known for its metal reduction capabilities. Courtesy of Jen Fisher

  9. Preparation of MR-1 Cultures Stock cultures stored at -80° C in glycerol are thawed on ice Plated on Luria Bertani agar Single colony picked and grown 24 h in liquid LB to density of ~109 cells/mL Cells pelleted (centrifuged @ 3500 rpm for 15 min) Cells resuspended with PO4- and CO3- free buffer 1 mL (~109 cells) added to FEP tubes Courtesy of Jen Fisher

  10. Sample Composition • Prepare solution phase • Radionuclide • 50 – 100 Bq mL-1241Am • 50 – 200 Bq mL-1233U • Buffer • pH range 6 to 8 • Dilutant – up to 20 mL DI • Add tuff • Select particle size 500 – 600 μm • Select fraction of solid phase (Bq g-1) • Solution to solid ratio

  11. Batch Experiments • Vortex for 2 minutes. • Centrifuge samples for 2 minutes. • Time based on previous kinetic studies • Liquid scintillation counting (100 μL into 10 mL liquid scintillation cocktail). • Collect samples every 10-15 minutes for the first two hours. * All samples were created in 50 mL FEP centrifuge tubes

  12. RESULTS

  13. Results – 241Am • Samples contain: • Solution phase: • 100 or 200 Bq mL-1 241Am • NaHCO3 to obtain a pH of ~8 • 20 mL total volume, adjusted with DI • Solid phase: • 1 gram tuff, ground to 500-600 μm

  14. Equilibrium Results – 241Am

  15. Kinetics Results – 241Am

  16. Results – 241Am with MR-1 • Nine samples, each had 20 mL of solution phase adjusted to pH 7 with NaOH. Bacteria were present in 5 samples ~ 1E+08 cells mL-1:

  17. Results – 241Am with MR-1

  18. Results – 241Am with MR-1

  19. Results – 233U • To determine ideal conditions for sorption kinetic studies:

  20. Kinetics Results – 233U

  21. Kinetics Results – 233U • Six samples were created to obtain kinetics and equilibrium data, all contained 20 mL solution phase and had a pH of ~7 using NaOH:

  22. Results – 233U

  23. Results – 233U with MR-1 • Six samples, each had 20 mL of solution phase adjusted to pH 7 with NaOH:

  24. Results – 233U with MR-1

  25. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK

  26. Conclusions • Quick sorption kinetics were obtained for 241Am and 233U. • Sorption of 233U affected by carbonate formation when using NaHCO3 as a buffer. • Sorption of 241Am and 233U to MR-1/growth medium.

  27. Future Work • Repeat 241Am and 233U sorption in the presence of bacteria with replicates. • Perform sorption experiments in the presence of bacterial growth medium and absence of MR-1 • Repeat sorption experiments with other radionuclides of interest. • Tc, Np, Pu

  28. Acknowledgements • Richard Gostic • Megan Bennett • Dr. Ralf Sudowe • Dr. Thomas Hartmann • Tom O’Dou and Trevor Low • Funding provided by DOE/EPSCoR Partnership Grant DE-FG02-06ER46295

  29. UNLV Radiochemistry

  30. Extra Slides

  31. Results – 241Am with MR-1

  32. Results – 241Am with MR-1

  33. Equilibrium Results – 233U

More Related