1 / 24

Home-Grown Coding Systems—A Critical Step in EMR Implementation

Home-Grown Coding Systems—A Critical Step in EMR Implementation. Eric Rose, MD Associate Director for Clinical Informatics Information Systems Department University of Washington Physicians Network http://faculty.washington.edu/momus/. SUMMARY.

elia
Download Presentation

Home-Grown Coding Systems—A Critical Step in EMR Implementation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Home-Grown Coding Systems—A Critical Step in EMR Implementation Eric Rose, MD Associate Director for Clinical Informatics Information Systems Department University of Washington Physicians Network http://faculty.washington.edu/momus/ Eric Rose, MD

  2. SUMMARY • Implementation of any EMR (including vendor-supplied) requires the that the user institution create coding systems • This can be done well or badly • It matters Eric Rose, MD

  3. Some definitions • Concept: an idea encompassing a class of objects ("unit of knowledge created by a unique combination of characteristics"-ISO) • Term: A word denoting a concept • Terminology/Controlled Vocabulary/Ontology: a set of terms pertaining to a given domain, not necessarily with any structure • Nomenclature: A terminology “structured systematically according to pre-established naming rules” (ISO) Eric Rose, MD

  4. Some definitions (cont’d) • Coding system: A terminology + context-free symbolic codes for each term • Classification/taxonomy: A terminology system + specified relationships between terms (“concept system”-ISO 1087-1) Eric Rose, MD

  5. What is a coding system and what does it do? • Represents in a standardized fashion • Groups • Separates • Abbreviates • Facilitates automated data-processing & transmittal Eric Rose, MD

  6. Types of coding systems • Simple, 1-1 (CA, NY, TX) • Categorical (record store bins) • Hierarchical (homo sapiens) • Multiaxial (Dewey-decimal, SNOMED) Eric Rose, MD

  7. What does this have to do with EMR Implementation? Eric Rose, MD

  8. THE UNIVERSE OF CONCEPTS READ LOINC NANDA SNOMED CT CPT ICD-10 NDC ICD-9-CM NCPDP Eric Rose, MD

  9. What does this have to do with EMR Implementation? • Most EMR’s allow customized choices for various database items • Each one of these is a small coding system Eric Rose, MD

  10. What does this have to do with EMR Implementation? (cont’d) If developed carefully, home-grown coding systems facilitate: • Intuitive data entry • Interpretable data @ individual patient level • Usable data at population level • Usable data for automated decision-support systems • Data that is shareable with other systems Eric Rose, MD

  11. Examples of mini-coding systems you might need to create • Disease Categories for Family History • Reason for Visit • Allergic Reaction Type • Delivery Outcome • Anesthesia Type for Surgery • Source of Diagnostic Specimens • Ethnic Group • Marital Status Eric Rose, MD

  12. What makes a coding system good? • Completeness • Nonredundancy • Clarity • Stability • Granularity appropriate to use or flexible • Evolutionary (Adapted from Cimino, 1998; Chute et al., 1998) Eric Rose, MD

  13. Completeness There should be a term for any possible situation Eric Rose, MD

  14. Completeness—ExampleReason for Medication Discontinuation Allergic response Alternate therapy Availability Cost of medication Discontinued by another Health Care Provider Discontinued by patient Dose adjustment Duplicate Error Ineffective NON Covered Medication Paradoxical response Pregnancy Prescription never filled Reorder Resistant Organism Side effects Therapy completed What if medication was never taken by patient? No way to denote that! Eric Rose, MD

  15. Nonredundancy There should be only one term for any given situation Eric Rose, MD

  16. Nonredundancy-ExampleNext of Kin-Relationship to patient Domestic Partner Life Partner Partner Significant Other Eric Rose, MD

  17. Clarity The categories in your coding system should be unambiguous to all users Eric Rose, MD

  18. Clarity-Examples Family Medical History category “Blood Disease,” “Anesthesia” Medication reason-for-d/c “Alternative Therapy,” “Error” Eric Rose, MD

  19. Stability Once defined, the meaning of a code must not be changed, though it may be inactivated so it is not applied to any new cases Eric Rose, MD

  20. Appropriate or Flexible Granularity Granularity = Level of detail described by the coding system, i.e. “fineness” of categorization Low granularity = Few, broad categories High granularity = Many, narrow categories Eric Rose, MD

  21. Appropriate Granularity-ExamplesFamily History categories “Alcohol dependency,” “Drug dependency”—It is sufficient to just have one category for “Chemical Dependency” “Heart disease”-Not granular enough to meet needs of risk assessment for coronary disease Eric Rose, MD

  22. Evolutionary Coding system development is an ongoing process, requiring addition of new categories and inactivation of old ones to keep the system congruent with prevailing ideas. Example = Family History category, “Venous Thrombosis” Eric Rose, MD

  23. Guiding principles • CENTRALIZE control of the coding system • Keep your lists SHORT • Respond PROMPTLY to user requests for additions and explain rationale when it’s not appropriate to meet the request • Design for the future including new user types & interfaces • Careful with “Other” Eric Rose, MD

  24. For further reading: • Bakken S et al. Toward Vocabulary Domain Specifications for Health Level 7-coded Data Elements. JAMIA 7:333-342, 2000. • Cimino JJ. Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies in the twenty-first century. Methods Inf Med. 1998 Nov;37(4-5):394-403 • Chute CG. Cohn SP. Campbell JR. A framework for comprehensive health terminology systems in the United States. JAMIA 5(6):503-10, 1998 Nov-Dec. • ISO 1087-1:2000. Terminology Work-Vocabulary-Part 1: Theory and Application Eric Rose, MD

More Related