1 / 18

Status of CCSDS work in response to IOAG Resolutions

Status of CCSDS work in response to IOAG Resolutions. Adrian Hooke (NASA) and Nestor Peccia (ESA) CCSDS Technical Liaisons. IOAG-11 June18, 2007 Cebreros, Spain. Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS). ASA/Austria CAS/China CAST/China CRC/Canada CRL/Japan CSIR/S.Africa

elan
Download Presentation

Status of CCSDS work in response to IOAG Resolutions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of CCSDS work in response to IOAG Resolutions Adrian Hooke (NASA) and Nestor Peccia (ESA) CCSDS Technical Liaisons IOAG-11 June18, 2007 Cebreros, Spain

  2. Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) ASA/Austria CAS/China CAST/China CRC/Canada CRL/Japan CSIR/S.Africa CSIRO/Australia CTA/Brazil DSR/Denmark EUMETSAT/Europe EUTELSAT/Europe FSST&CA/Belgium HNSC/Greece IKI/Russia ISAS/Japan ISRO/India KARI/Korea KFKI/Hungary MOC/Israel NCST/USA NOAA/USA NSPO/Taipei SSC/Sweden TsNIIMash/Russia USGS/USA ASI/Italy BNSC/UK CNES/France CSA/Canada DLR/Germany ESA/Europe FSA/Russia INPE/Brazil JAXA/Japan NASA/USA

  3. CCSDS Technical Context: Six Focus Areas Space Internetworking Services Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services Mission Operations and Information Management Services Space Link Services Cross Support Services Systems Engineering

  4. CCSDS Technical Context: Twenty Three Active Working Groups -- CFDP Testing -- Cislunar Space Internet. -- Asynchronous Messaging -- IP-over-CCSDS Links -- Onboard Subnet. Services -- Onboard Application Services -- Data Archive Ingestion -- Navigation -- Info. Pack. & Registries -- Spacecraft Mon. & Control -- RF & Modulation -- Space Link Coding & Sync. -- Data Compression -- Space Link Protocols -- TC Channel Coding -- Ranging -- High Rate Uplink -- Systems Architecture -- Security -- Information Architecture -- Space Addressing and Naming -- Service Management -- Cross Support Transfer Services

  5. Current CCSDS Program of Work: Area Directors and Working Group Chairs

  6. IOAG-08 RESOLUTIONS (Res 8.5.1) REQUEST FOR A FRAMEWORK FOR CROSS- SUPPORT SERVICE ARCHITECTURE (Res 8.5.1) REQUEST FOR A FRAMEWORK FOR A CROSS- SUPPORT SERVICES CATALOG (Res 8.1.1) URGENT NEED FOR A SLE MANAGEMENT SERVICES RECOMMENDATION (Res 8.4.1) ADVICE ON CROSS-SUPPORT TRANSFER SERVICES WORKING GROUP CHARTER (Res 8.3.1) ADVICE FOR SIMPLIFICATION OF RF & MOD. RECOMMENDATIONS (Res 8.7.1) REQUEST FOR A HIGH RATE COMMANDING RECOMMENDATION (Res 8.8.1) REQUEST FOR A DELTA DOR RECOMMENDATION (Res 8.2.1) CCSDS STRATEGIC PLAN: SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS Discussed on Tuesday’s agenda Adrian Hooke Nestor Peccia

  7. (8.1.1 and 8.4.1)CCSDS Cross Support Services Area

  8. (8.1.1) Service Management Working Group (SMWG):Major Activities Erik: could you make this a schedule chart?

  9. (8.1.1) Service Management Working Group (SMWG):Summary Status

  10. (8.1.1) Service Management Working Group (SMWG):Detailed Status Key:

  11. Work is in progress in the SLS RFM WG. CCSDS (401) recommendations 2.4.17A and 2.4.17B are both being reworked. Simultaneously, an update of the Green Book (413) is in progress to reflect the changes in 401. (8.3.1) RF & Modulation Simplifications Jean-Luc: could you please add schedule information?

  12. (8.7.1) High Rate Uplink • HRU Working Group met in Colorado Spring in January 2007 but could not identify substantive mission requirements: • NASA presented HRU related “requirements” from Project Constellation. From a CCSDS perspective, these look more like solutions. • Each Agency needs to present its mission scenarios associated with high rate uplinks • NASA claims it has these scenarios but cannot yet share them with other space agencies until management approval is given. • ESA will investigate whether preliminary scenarios are available from the AURORA programme. • A set of CCSDS high rate uplink related requirements has yet to be defined. • The deadline given to the WG of End of Year 2007 for a blue book is deemed very hard to achieve given these constraints. • HRU-WG requested more definitive requirements from IOAG in April 2007: Greg: anything to add??

  13. The revised Delta-DOR Operations White Book is at a level of maturity, such that it could be issued for review at CESG level. Book will be finally issued as GB; 2nd Half 2007 (8.8.1) Delta DOR

  14. The main comments of the IOAG were as follows: it should be more than just a vision. A driver is the development of a long term architecture for cross support services lack in connections to the forward-looking future of the various space agencies lack in planning for standards infusion lack in enganging members for the infusion of each new recommendation how area objectives and goals are ascertained Strategic and Operating Plans have to be read together. Both have to be reworked (not only considering IOAG comments, but internal CCSDS discussions) (8.2.1) CCSDS Strategic Plan

  15. Strategic Plan should be updated according to comment 1 Comment 2 should be discussed with IOAG. Sometimes the forward looking future of the Agencies is vague or concentrates in one domain (e.g. exploration but not EO) Strategic Plan should be updated with Comment 3. Input to be provided regularly (1 year?) by IOAG Comment 4 is an illusion. Take as example the CFDP. No strategic Plan will help in the infusion of a new recommendation within an Agency. Paper does not help. Strategic and Operating Plans should be updated with Comment 5 (after discussion with IOAG) (8.2.1) CCSDS Strategic Plan

  16. Backup Information

  17. IOAG 8.1.1 (Resolution aboutCCSDS Service Management Standardization) (1/2)

  18. IOAG 8.1.1 (Resolution aboutCCSDS Service Management Standardization) (2/2)

More Related