1 / 10

RPR Interconnection Topologies

This presentation explores two basic RPR interconnection topologies, A and B, and compares their application scenarios and benefits. It provides a tentative conclusion for network deployment decisions based on flexibility and cost considerations.

ebledsoe
Download Presentation

RPR Interconnection Topologies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RPR Interconnection Topologies zhaisuping@huawei.com yanw@huawei.com IEEE802.17 WG Orlando, Florida USA March 11~16, 2007

  2. Two Basic RPR Interconnection Topologies Topology A Topology B

  3. The Comparison of Two Topologies

  4. The Comparison of Two Topologies – Cont. Tentative Conclusion (need further discussion): When the requirement of network deployment flexibility outweighs the cost, then the Topology B is used, or else the Topology A is recommended in the RPR interconnection rings network.

  5. The following slides will illustrate the different application scenarios for the interconnected RPR rings. The following figures take the Topology A as example, but the same topologies also apply to Topology B as well.

  6. Application Scenario 1 • There are several subtending rings across one ring. • Each pair of interconnected stations ({A, B} and {C,D}) are independent and belong to different protection groups.

  7. Application Scenario 2 • There are several subtending rings across one ring, and these subtending rings share a common station. • Each pair of interconnected stations ({A, B} and {B, C}) are independent and belong to different protection groups.

  8. Application Scenario 3 • There are several subtending rings across one ring, and these subtending rings share the same interconnection stations. • For the usual deployment, subtending access rings are not communicated each other, they only need to communicate with the aggregation rings. • But if the subtending access rings need to communicate each other, they still can at the cost of some implementation complexity.

  9. Application Scenario 4 • We don’t want support this disordered topologies. Do we want?

  10. Thank you

More Related