1 / 13

Why study statins?

Why study statins?. #1 & #2 selling drugs in the world are statins – these two drugs account for 5% of the entire United States spending on drugs ($11.2 billion dollars), since Heart disease is the #1 killer in industrialized countries The poor prognosis of homozygous FH patients.

eagan
Download Presentation

Why study statins?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Why study statins? • #1 & #2 selling drugs in the world are statins – these two drugs account for 5% of the entire United States spending on drugs ($11.2 billion dollars), since • Heart disease is the #1 killer in industrialized countries • The poor prognosis of homozygous FH patients

  2. Why study statins? • Interesting clinical trial (hi)story – some highlights • 100 years ago Virchow discovers “atheroma” • 1985: NIH initiates public health initiative to educate patients and doctors about dangers of hypercholesterolemia • First statins caused cataracts and did not reduce plasma cholesterol in rats – why? • Crazy synthesis of mevinolin, which works for heterozygous FH • Mevinolin is twice withdrawn from clinical studies Mevinolin - further proof fermentation is a good thing

  3. Why study statins? • Classic example of a simple biochemical intervention that turned out to be much more complicated than anyone thought…. • Hence, the papers

  4. Goal of the study How is lovastatin causing a decrease in plasma LDL concentration?

  5. Their approach - eliminate a possible mechanism for lovastatin • Two possible mechanisms of action: • ↓LDL by ↓formation of apo-B • ↑uptake of VLDL remnants due to ↑LDLR, so fewer VLDL remnants to be converted to LDL No receptors means no VLDL or LDL clearance by liver – if cholesterol is lowered, lovastatin is decreasing production of lipoproteins

  6. The patients • Requirements: 1) severe hypercholesterolemia 2) extremely low LDL-R activity in skin fibroblasts 3) evidence of heterozygous FH in both parents * Normal cholesterol levels are <200mg/dL; studies show levels of 240 mg/dL put you at 2x risk for coronary events Study protocol: 4 wks of control, 6 wks of lovastatin treatment under controlled conditions

  7. Results

  8. Kinetics results

  9. Conclusions • ↓LDL must be due to LDL-R activity • ↑LDL in homozygous FH probably due to lack of uptake of VLDL by liver; transfer to LDL by lipoprotein lipase, NOT to ↑ apo-B synthesis in liver • A very significant decrease in plasma [VLDL] – why?

  10. Two theories, neither satisfactory • Theory 1: partial inhibition of cholesterol synthesis means less VLDL • Problem: rate of formation of LDL was not reduced; this is not the mechanism of action of lovastatin • Theory 2: Small residue of LDL-R activity removes remnants, but not LDL • Problem: they’ve established these patients have essential NO receptor activity and their experiment is based on a lack of receptor activity

  11. Who approved this IRB? Is this the best way to answer their question?

  12. Points to consider • Isn’t an animal receptor KO model essentially the same as the human homozygous FH model? Has this experiment already been done? • Is it appropriate to use human subjects to confirm a drug does NOT work? • What if you take them off their current treatment for months? • What if you feed them a diet that further complicates their illness? • What if they are six-year-old children? • What if previous studies seem to indicate that the drug will not work? • What if you will be using radioactive iodine isotopes? (invasiveness of study) • How would you pitch this study to a family? (i.e., this probably won’t work, but what’s important is why?) • Is obtaining consent from a 6-yr-old feasible? • Does the prognosis of the patients make a difference?

More Related