100 likes | 228 Views
BioDiscovery Toronto @. May 5 , 2005. 1. What kind of policy instruments can shape the evolution of clusters?. “Institutions for Collaboration” / “Fourth Pillar Organizations” - central to the concept of clusters (Porter) - focus of Biotechnology Cluster Innovation Program
E N D
BioDiscovery Toronto @ May 5 , 2005
1. What kind of policy instruments can shape the evolution of clusters? “Institutions for Collaboration” / “Fourth Pillar Organizations” - central to the concept of clusters (Porter) - focus of Biotechnology Cluster Innovation Program • The MaRS Discovery District represents an investment to create ‘physical capital’ in the form of a ‘hub’ organization for the commercialization of discoveries in the medical and related sciences. • BioDiscovery Toronto represents an investment to create ‘social capital’ at MaRS through leveraging the business development capacity of 8 research hospitals and universities and providing a two-way interface with the bio-finance and bio-medical industries.
BioDiscovery Toronto Mandate To maximize commercialization of research in Toronto by linking research, industry and capital Focus Provision of a fully functional central interface between the research community and industry as well as a facilitator of cross-institutional activity
2. What are policy outcomes & can they be linked to specific policy initiatives • Networking that yields better leverage, focus, continuity, cohesion • Better opportunities to bundle IP • Clearer ‘branding’ • A dynamic public-private interface • ….. still missing is any real direct policy support for ‘downstream’ private sector initiatives
3. What mechanisms enable multi-level governance in the cluster? • IFCs are probably the best mechanism going • Too many levels of governance in Canada! • Should we really need such mechanisms? • Our approach is to try and collapse these!!
4. What place do they leave for private sector participants? • Clusters are largely defined by the private sector • Reverse the question … instead of asking ‘what place is left in cluster governance mechanisms for the private sector?’ • We should be asking ‘what mechanisms do the private sector believe to be necessary for development of their cluster?’
5. Do we need a better science/cluster policy ‘process’ in Canada? • Tendency to be focus on ‘ex post’ issues • presumably because science policy in Canada is very much a process of ‘revealed preferences’. • Should we not be concerned with the development of a more robust and transparent science and cluster policy process? • not only for Life Sciences but for all areas affecting innovation systems?
Ontario’s Life Sciences Gateway Technology-based SMEs Entrepreneurs Researchers pursuing commercial opportunities Toronto Ottawa & Eastern Ontario Guelph London Western GTA Northern Ontario Southwest Ontario Waterloo Golden Horseshoe York Region Peterborough Kingston • Regional Innovation Networks • Align Regional Resources (address gaps) • Leverage Federal Funding • Linkages to business support infrastructure • Linkages to Research Infrastructure • MaRS • Knowledge Management System (Gateway to the World) • RIN Support e-tools (MaRS Web Portal) • Domestic / International VC Connections • Commercialization Initiatives (Province Wide)
BioDiscovery Toronto Operational Model Inputs Customers BioDiscovery Toronto Institution for Collaboration Industry Member Institutions Member Institutions Tech Transfer Market analysis (internal/external) Best practices & professional development Capital