1 / 15

Michael L. Tushman & Philip Anderson 마은정 , 김동희

Technological Discontinuities & Organizational Environments. Michael L. Tushman & Philip Anderson 마은정 , 김동희. 1. Summary.

dympna
Download Presentation

Michael L. Tushman & Philip Anderson 마은정 , 김동희

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Technological Discontinuities & Organizational Environments Michael L. Tushman& Philip Anderson 마은정, 김동희

  2. 1. Summary • Technology : as those tools, devices, and knowledge that mediate between inputs and outputs (process technology) and or that create new products or services (product technology). • Technology seems to evolve in response to the interplay of history, individuals, and market demand. Technological progress constitutes an evolutionary system punctuated by discontinuous change. Technological experimentation and competition persists within a product class until a dominant design emerges. • After a dominant design is evolved, improvement becomes incremental. When there are discontinuities, they usually offer distinct price-performance improvements over existing technologies. • Competence-destroying discontinuities require new skills, abilities, and knowledge in either process or product design. The skills needed for the core technology shift, causing power and structure shifts in organizations. They are usually initiated by new firms.

  3. 1. Summary • Competence-enhancing discontinuities are "order-of-magnitude improvements in price-performance that build on existing know-how within a product class". These discontinuities tend to consolidate industry leadership. • Technology changes affect environments through uncertainty (level of predictability) and munificence (extent to which an environment can support growth). Both will be higher after a discontinuity. • Competency-enhancing changes will cause lower entry-to-exit ratio as smaller firms are squeezed out. • Competence-destroying changes will have increase entry-to-exit ratios as new firms capitalize on changes established firms can't quickly adapt to. • Firms that initiate major technological change will have higher growth rates than other firms in the product class.

  4. 1. Summary • H1 : Technological change within a product class will be characterized by long periods of incremental change punctuated by discontinuities.

  5. 1. Summary • H2 : The locus of innovation will differ for competence-destroying and competence-enhancing technological changes. Competence-destroying discontinuities will be initiated by new entrants, while competence-enhancing discontinuities will be initiated by existing firms.

  6. 1. Summary • H3 : Competitive uncertainty will be higher after a technological discontinuity than before the discontinuity. • H4 : Environmental munificence • will be higher after a • technological discontinuity • than before the discontinuity.

  7. 1. Summary • H5 : Competence-enhancing • discontinuities will be • associated with decreased • entry-to-exit ratios and • decreased inter firm sales • variability. These patterns • will be reversed for • competence-destroying • discontinuities.

  8. 1. Summary • H6 : Successive competence-enhancing discontinuities will be associated with smaller increases in uncertainty and munificence. • H7 : Those organizations that initiate major technological innovations will have higher growth rates than other firms in the product class.

  9. 2. Discussion (1) Dominant design • Dominant design’s emergence “de facto standard”, meaning that while it may not be officially enforced or acknowledged, it has become a standard for the industry.

  10. 2. Discussion (1) Dominant design <Case> The Rise of Microsoft 기존 저장장치 : 펀치카드 IBM : 플로피 디스크 개발 IBM : CP/M 개발 (Gary Kildall) IBM : Gary Kildall과 계약 실패 Apple Computer 등장 IBM : PC 개발에 무관심 IBM : Bill Gates와 계약 MS DOS 개발 • Windows 개발 시장점유율 확보 만약 Kildall이 IBM과 계약했다면? 다른 컴퓨터 제조업체가 IBM과 같은 PC를 만들 수 없었다면?

  11. 2. Discussion (1) Dominant design • Dominant design 발생 모형의 예외가 되는 product 혹은 process의 존재? • 성공적인 기업이 신기술을 수용하는 데 부정적인 이유에는 어떤 것이 있는가? • Dominant design은 기술의 측면에서 최고인 대상이기 보다는 시장의 다수수요자들의 • 필요성을가장 잘 만족시켜줄 수 있는 기능이 결합한 형태가 된다. 그 원인은?

  12. 2. Discussion (2) Technological discontinuities • competence-enhancing discontinuities (역량강화적 변화) • vs • competence-destroying discontinuities (역량파괴적 변화) ‘승자의 저주’ 발생 !

  13. 2. Discussion (2) Technological discontinuities Competence-enhancingdiscontinuities

  14. 2. Discussion (2) Technological discontinuities • 단속 평형 이론(punctuated Equilibrium)vs계통 점진 이론 • 단속 평형 이론 : 진화생물학으로부터 단순평형 개념을 차용하여, • Baumgartner & Jones(1993)이 policy change를 설명하기 • 위해 개발한 이론 • - 연구들에서 주목하고 있는 핵심적 구두점의 하나는 기술혁신에 • 의한 환경변화임. 이러한 변화는 기술적 불연속성에 의하여 • 불안정한 기간을 발생시키고, 지배적인 디자인 또는 비즈니스 • 패러다임의출연에 의해 종료됨 • 계통 점진이론 : 지속적이며 점증적인 종의 변화를 강조

  15. 2. Discussion • 모든 산업에 대해 “1가지 이론이 정답이다”라고 할 수는 없다. 그렇다면 앞의 2가지 • 이론들을산업(제품)군별로 적용시킨다면 어떤 특성이 있을까? • 기술변화로 인한 변화를 적극적으로 수용하는 기업이 그 산업분야에서 우위를 점할 • 가능성이 많은 것인가?(가설7) • - FAST SECOND 전략의 성공 의미

More Related