1 / 9

mark.wood@engineer

The Inter-Agency Telecommunications Action Plan (ITAP) By; Mark Wood G4HLZ National Radio Project Officer, British Red Cross. For; Global Amateur Radio Emergency Communications conference, Tampere, Finland 13-14 June 2005. mark.wood@engineer.com.

dusty
Download Presentation

mark.wood@engineer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TheInter-Agency Telecommunications Action Plan (ITAP)By;Mark Wood G4HLZNational Radio Project Officer, British Red Cross. For;Global Amateur Radio Emergency Communications conference,Tampere, Finland 13-14 June 2005. mark.wood@engineer.com

  2. “Everyone agrees there must be coordination, but no one wants to be coordinated”.

  3. The Problem;The UK is blessed with at least two competing voluntary aid societies, with many more in unofficial capacities.St. John Ambulance brigade pre-dates Red Cross, is the senior service.British Red Cross has a somewhat different status than in the USA for exampleRAYNET is one amateur Radio society UK Resilience is a new government body aimed at coordinating emergency relief efforts.No one is in charge!

  4. The Problem; • The voluntary aid societies had no common radio channels, there was also no way to communicate between an ambulance and its Ham Radio escort vehicle or control point. • Due to not wanting to favorite one competing organization, we found it hard to get favors from government. • No organization would accept the authority of the other to coordinate them.

  5. The Problem; ITAP BRC SJA RAYNET UK RES.

  6. The Problem; ITAP BRC SJA RAYNET UK RES.

  7. The Problem; RAYNET UK RES. BRC SJA ITAP

  8. Achievements; • We all have a common frequency and tone plan, each can now work with the other as is often done now. • RAYNET obtained an unused repeater from the Surrey government. • Work has started on the MoU and best practices. • We can now negociate with the regulator as a unified block, so there is no favoritism issue.

  9. ITAP-UK The End By Mark Wood G4HLZ. Mark.wood@engineer.com

More Related