1 / 40

CAO FCAT to FCAT 2.0 Impact Data & Winter Diagnostics

CAO FCAT to FCAT 2.0 Impact Data & Winter Diagnostics. January 2012. Marc Baron – Chief, Performance Accountability Mark Howard – Director, Research, Evaluation and Assessment. DRE. Impact Data. Spring FY11 FCAT 1.0 Levels vs. FCAT 2.0 Levels Percent of All Students Level 3+

driscoll-roman
Download Presentation

CAO FCAT to FCAT 2.0 Impact Data & Winter Diagnostics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CAOFCAT to FCAT 2.0 Impact Data & Winter Diagnostics January 2012 Marc Baron – Chief, Performance Accountability Mark Howard – Director, Research, Evaluation and Assessment DRE

  2. Impact Data • Spring FY11 FCAT 1.0 Levels vs. FCAT 2.0 Levels • Percent of All Students Level 3+ • Combined Grade Levels DRE

  3. Source of Graphs for ElementaryFamilies>>Test Results and Other Assessment Information >>Diagnostics>> Students with Change in Predicted Levels – RTSDA0518 and Schools-New Levels 4 Ways Reading and Math Pct in each level and level3+ Each grade at school Combined grade for school

  4. Grades 3-5 & 6-8 Reading and Math Level 3+ PercentFY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0

  5. Grades 3-5 & 6-8 Reading and Math Level 3+ PercentPercent Change FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0

  6. Elementary Reading Level 3+ Percent Change in % of FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0

  7. Elementary Math Level 3+ Percent Change in % of FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0

  8. Middle School Reading Level 3+ Percent Change in % of FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0

  9. Middle School Math Level 3+ Percent Change in % of FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0

  10. Charter Schools Reading Level 3+ Percent Change in % of FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0

  11. Charter Schools Math Level 3+ Percent Change in % of FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0

  12. Alternative Schools Reading Level 3+ Percent Change in % of FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0

  13. Alternative Schools Math Level 3+ Percent Change in % of FY11 FCAT 1.0 to FCAT 2.0

  14. Source of Graphs for ElementaryFamilies>>Test Results and Other Assessment Information >>Diagnostics>> Students with Change in Predicted Levels – RTSDA0518 and Schools-New Levels 4 Ways Reading and Math Pct in each level and level3+ Each grade at school Combined grade for school Difference between Fall & Winter

  15. Fall to Winter Diagnostic Data • Already reviewed • Standard • Self • Others • Look fors: • Extremes (highest and lowest) • Outliers (discontinuous progression) DRE

  16. FY12 Fall to Winter Reading DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 3-5 Reading L3+ C H A N G E +9 -9 …………schools………………..

  17. FY12 Fall to Winter Reading DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 3 Reading L3+ +17 C H A N G E -12

  18. FY12 Fall to Winter Reading DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 4 Reading L3+ +23 C H A N G E -10

  19. FY12 Fall to Winter Reading DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 5 Reading L3+ +13 C H A N G E -17

  20. FY12 Fall to Winter Math DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 3-5 Math L3+ +17 C H A N G E -10

  21. FY12 Fall to Winter Math DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 3 Math L3+ +40 C H A N G E -16

  22. FY12 Fall to Winter Math DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 4 Math L3+ +24 C H A N G E -19

  23. FY12 Fall to Winter Math DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 5 Math L3+ +24 C H A N G E -17

  24. FY12 Fall to Winter Science DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 3-5 Science L3+ C H A N G E +8 -11

  25. FY12 Fall to Winter Science DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 3 Science L3+ +18 C H A N G E -15

  26. FY12 Fall to Winter Science DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 4 MathL3+ +17 C H A N G E -24

  27. FY12 Fall to Winter Science DiagnosticChange in % of Grades 5 Science L3+ +15 C H A N G E -22

  28. Winter Diagnostic Data Winter FY11 to Winter FY12 All tested students Diamond Report DRE

  29. Diamond ReportBenchmarks and Focus Areas Know your instructional targets DRE

  30. Winter Diagnostic Grade 3 MathSorted difference in change lowest to highest

  31. Winter Diagnostic Grade 3 Math Sorted difference in change lowest to highest MA 3 A 2 1 Equivalent fractions 31 68 -37 Equivalent fractions 36 71 -35 Fraction size Equivalent fractions Equivalent fractions Equivalent fractions Equivalent fractions

  32. Winter Diagnostic Grade 4 MathSorted difference in change lowest to highest

  33. Winter Diagnostic Grade 4 MathSorted difference in change lowest to highest MA 4 A 6 3 Fraction to decimal 26 58 -32 20 43 -23 Equivalent fractions Equivalent fractions

  34. Winter Diagnostic Grade 5 MathSorted difference in change lowest to highest

  35. Winter Diagnostic Grade 5 MathSorted difference in change lowest to highest MA 5 A 2 4 27 43 -16 Prime Factorization Prime Factorization Order of Operations 49 41 8 Order of Operations

  36. Winter Diagnostic Grade 3 ReadingSorted difference in change lowest to highest

  37. Winter Diagnostic Grade 4 ReadingSorted difference in change lowest to highest

  38. Winter Diagnostic Grade 5 ReadingSorted difference in change lowest to highest

  39. Review District Diamond Reports Winter FY11 to Winter FY12 Diagnostic ResultsAverage Item Percent Correct Equivalent fractions Equivalent fractions Prime Factorization Order of Operations

  40. Summary • FCAT to FCAT 2.0 Impact Data • Less proficient students across grade levels • Some schools impacted greater than others • Fall to Winter Diagnostics • Some schools impacted greater than others • Winter to Winter Item Analysis • General decline • Math impacted greater than reading • Differential performance by benchmark/focus

More Related