Download
developments and studies for the linac n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Developments and Studies for the Linac PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Developments and Studies for the Linac

Developments and Studies for the Linac

142 Views Download Presentation
Download Presentation

Developments and Studies for the Linac

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Developments and Studies for the Linac D. Raparia 11/02/2006 APEX 2006 Workshop

  2. Outlines • Energy spread reduction of polarized proton from Linac (AP issue) • Injecting polarized proton at 116 MeV (Reliability & Cost issue)

  3. Energy Spread Reduction of Polarized Proton from Linac • 1989 tech note (Brennan,Ahrens,Alessi) dp/p =  0.14% (full max ?) • 1999 Down HEBT (0.5 mA H-) dp/p =  0.16% FWFM  0.076 FWHM • 2000-2004 dp/p =  0.067 to  0.07 FWHM (polarized proton) • Can we reduce it ? • Do we want to reduce it ?

  4. Energy Spread as function of T8 & T9 Phases (PARMILA Calculation) E Operating 0  360  Tank 8 Tank 9 0  360 

  5. Measurement in HEBT1999 (I=0.5 mA H-) PARMILA p/p=  0.015%(rms) Measurement p/p=  0.080% FWFM p/p=  0.053% FWHM T8 & T9  +180  T=158 MeV =0.517, =1.168 =0.604 2 3=0.426 PARMILA p/p= 0.11%(rms) Measurement p/p=  0.160% FWFM p/p=  0.076% FWHM Normal Operating phase T=200 MeV =0.566, =1.213 0.687 2 3=0.572 Measurement p/p=  0.088% FWFM p/p=  0.053% FWHM T8  = +180 T=162 MeV =0.522, =1.173 =0.612 2 3=0.440

  6. Consequences of Lower Energy • Space charge tune spread Pulse length 350s,I=0.5mA=> N=1.1 x 1012; x= y=1.0 cm, coasting beam @200MeV=0.007;@162MeV=0.009;@158MeV=0.0097 • Emittance growth due to foil scattering Foil Thickness 100 g/cm2. ; 350 turn injection LTB: x(n,95%)=6.87, y(n,95%)=13.64; Beta function at injection: x=10.9 m, y=4.9 m 200 MeV 162 MeV 158 MeV rms (mrad) 0.529 0.643 0.658 x(n,95%,  mm mrad) 14.8 18.6 19.1 y(n,95%,  mm mrad) 15.0 15.8 15.9 Effstrip(%) 91.0 94.6 94.9 • Depolarization due to emittance growth (?) • RHIC luminosity may not be effected, we do transverse and longitudinal scrapping in Booster

  7. Lower Energy Injection into Booster • BLIP run at 116 MeV with last four tanks off • If we run polarized proton at the 116 MeV: + Linac reliability will increase (9/5) + Linac operation cost will decrease only 5 RF system instead of 9 $33,705 +$110,875=$144,580 for 10 weeks Power Tube - Emittance growth due to higher multiple scattering angle at foil - Depolarization due to higher emittance (?)

  8. Space Charge Tune Spread =0.5 N r0 C/(422 3 y(x+ y)) N=1.1 1012, r0=1.54 10-18, C=200m x= y=1.0 cm, =5.2, coasting beam 200 MeV = 0.007, 2 3 = 0.572 116 MeV = 0.014, 2 3 = 0.295

  9. Emittance Growth due to Multiple Scattering at foil LTB: x(n,95%)=6.87, y(n,95%)=13.64; Beta function at injection: x=10.9 m, y=4.9 m 200 MeV 116 MeV Ratio  0.566 0.456 1.24  1.213 1.124 1.08  0.687 0.513 1.34 2 3 0.572 0.295 1.94 Number of Turns 290 360 1.24 foil thickness (g/cm2) 100 65 1.54 Effstrip (%)91.0 91.0 1.00 rms (mr) 0.529 0.693 0.78 x(n,95%, mm mrad) 14.8 18.1 0.82 y(n,95%,  mm mrad) 15.0 15.7 0.96 p/p (%) (MWHM) 0.07(Meas) 0.07 (cal) 1.00

  10. Conclusions • Energy spread reduction of polarized proton from linac can be reduced but at lower energy • Injecting polarized proton at 116 MeV, linac becomes more reliable (9/5) and one can save about $145K for 10 week run for power and tube cost