1 / 23

Eastgate/I-90 Land Use Code Amendments

Eastgate/I-90 Land Use Code Amendments. Study Session July 13, 2016. The PC is here to make a recommendation to the Council on the proposed land use code amendments. There are three new districts proposed (EG-TOD, OLB 2, NMU). Each district has new Dimensions Development Regulations

douglasmurray
Download Presentation

Eastgate/I-90 Land Use Code Amendments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Eastgate/I-90 Land Use Code Amendments Study Session July 13, 2016

  2. The PC is here to make a recommendation to the Council on the proposed land use code amendments. • There are three new districts proposed (EG-TOD, OLB 2, NMU). Each district has new • Dimensions • Development Regulations • Design Guidelines • Transition Area Design Guidelines • Conformance Amendments Eastgate luca Proposal

  3. Eastgate CAC 2010-2012 CAC provided recommendations with respect to Comprehensive Plan/Subarea Plan Transportation Facilities Plan Land Use Code

  4. The Process Comprehensive Plan Amendments including Eastgate Subarea Amendments Completed 2015 The Process

  5. The Process Meanwhile, the Eastgate Transportation Projects were adopted into the Transportation Facilities Plan. Now awaiting funding. The Process

  6. The Process The Process LUCA. We are here.

  7. The PC will review with respect to: Consistent with the Comprehensive Plan including the Eastgate Subarea Plan? (The stage has already been set.) Consistent with the CAC Final Report? (In the best interest of the citizens) Consistent with the environmental review and other background documents? The Framework

  8. “Wait to make changes until transportation projects are built” Consistent with Comprehensive Plan? State law requires that the development regulations are consistent with Comprehensive Plan. Consistent with CAC? The report allowed for phasing, but did not consider the issue above. “While there will always be “choke-points” at particular intersections in the corridor regardless of what changes in land use might occur, we believe the consequences of growth can be addressed through a combination of intersection improvements, improved transportation mode choice, non-motorized transportation facilities (e.g., pedestrian paths and bike lanes), and partnerships with transit service providers (King County/Metro, WSDOT, Sound Transit).” Suggestions Timing

  9. “Do not require residential in new EG-TOD zone” Consistent with Comprehensive Plan? Policy S-EG-1. Focus Eastgate growth into a mixed use center adjacent to the Eastgate Transit Center with greater height and intensity than the surrounding area. Policy S-EG-42. Encourage a mixed use area between Bellevue College and I-90 into a walkable, transit-oriented center at the level of intensity needed to create a vibrant mix of offices, residences, and locally-service shops and restaurants that are urban in character. Consistent with CAC Final Report? Land Use Code amendments should direct a substantial portion of the projected office and residential growth to the Transportation-Oriented Development Center….The Land Use Code regulations should ensure that development…includes: b. An appropriate mixture of uses, including office, residential and retail. suggestions EG-TOD

  10. “Increase parking garage height in EG-TOD from proposed 45 feet to 55 feet to accommodate retail on the ground floor” Consistent with Comprehensive Plan? Yes Consistent with CAC Final Report? Yes Consistent with other studies and documents? Yes “Increase building height in EG-TOD from 160 feet to 170 feet.” suggestions EG-TOD

  11. “Allow driveways as allowable interruptions on main pedestrian street.” Consistent with Comprehensive Plan? POLICY S-EG-2. Establish a pedestrian-oriented street that provides a community plaza and allows for connections between Bellevue College, the Eastgate Park and Ride, and the office, retail, and residential development in the transit-oriented development center. Consistent with CAC Final Report? CAC report repeated refers to a pedestrian-oriented main street. suggestions EG-TOD

  12. “Increase proposed maximum FAR in NMU from 1.0 to 2.5.” (Currently, FAR is 0.5) Consistent with Comprehensive Plan? Specific FAR is not discussed in Eastgate Subarea Plan. POLICY S-EG-1. Focus Eastgate growth into a mixed use center adjacent to the Eastgate Transit Center with greater height and intensity than the surrounding area. Consistent with CAC Final Report?“Maximum FAR: 0.75 to 1.0 is recommended” Consistent with Environmental Analysis? Environmental analysis studied up to 1.0 FAR. Change would require additional analysis and delay. Also consider impact to adjacent residential zones. suggestions NMU

  13. “Use an incentive system in NMU Base FAR 1.25, Max 2.5” (Currently, FAR is 0.5) Consistent with Comprehensive Plan? POLICY S-EG-44. Consider the use of a land use incentive system in office and mixed use areas that incentivizes provision of infrastructure and amenities that offer public benefits through the potential for additional floor area ratio (FAR) and height. POLICY S-EG-1. Focus Eastgate growth into a mixed use center adjacent to the Eastgate Transit Center with greater height and intensity than the surrounding area. Consistent with CAC Final Report? “Maximum FAR: 0.75 to 1.0 is recommended” Consistent with Environmental Analysis and other reports? Environmental analysis only studied up to 1.0 FAR Also, economic analysis determined that an incentive system was not viable in the area. Economics would dictate that developers would build to Base FAR and provide no public amenities. suggestions NMU

  14. CAC - New development on properties that receive additional development capacity as a result of the Eastgate/I-90 Land Use & Transportation Project (e.g., from the existing maximum FAR of 0.5 to something greater) should provide or contribute to public benefits as a condition of realizing that added capacity. suggestions NMU

  15. “Change the lot coverage in NMU from proposed 35% to 70% like Bel-Red” Consistent with Comprehensive Plan? POLICY S-EG-6. Ensure that increases in impervious surface area or stormwater runoff will not increase the quantity or worsen the stormwater quality entering public drainage systems, streams, Phantom Lake, Lake Washington, and Lake Sammamish. (The NMU in the Eastgate area would drain to Vasa Creek. Increasing the lot coverage from proposed 35 to 70% would increase the quantity of stormwater entering the public drainage system. Given that there are no natural drainage requirements in proposed NMU as there are in Bel-Red.) Also many general policies to reduce impervious surface. Consistent with CAC? No specific passages about lot coverage, but does favor reduction of impervious surface and low impact development. suggestions NMU

  16. Questions from the Commission? Questions

  17. For More Information: http://www.bellevuewa.gov/eastgate-corridor.htm Terry Cullen, Comprehensive Planning Manager, Planning and Community Development, 452-4070, tcullen@bellevuewa.gov Trish Byers, Code Development Manager, Development Services, 452-4241, pbyers@bellevuewa.gov Next steps NEXT STEPS Planning Commission transmits recommendation to Council Council considers Eastgate Land Use Code Amendments

  18. New land use Districts

  19. LAND USE CODE AMENDMENTS • THREE NEW DISTRICTS PROPOSED • Eastgate Transit Oriented Development (EG-TOD) • Office Limited Business (OLB 2) • Neighborhood Mixed Use (NMU) • Within Each Zone • Uses • Dimensional Requirements • Development Standards • Design Guidelines LAND USE Code amendments

  20. EG-TOD Transit Oriented Development District (EG-TOD). The purpose of the TOD District is to provide an area for a mix of housing, retail, office, and service uses, with an emphasis on housing. The district is limited in area so that there is an appropriate level of density nearest the highest levels of transit service. • FAR - 2.0 + • Up to 1.0 excepted for Affordable Housing, Open Space, Public Restrooms, Special Dedications and Transfers • Max. Bldg. Ht. 160 ft. (10-12 stories) /45 ft.

  21. Neighborhood Mixed Use (NMU). The purpose of the NMU District is to provide an area with a mix of retail, service, office and residential uses with an emphasis on neighborhood retail and service uses. This district is designed to be compatible with nearby neighborhoods and is easily accessible from the nearby office and residential uses. FAR – 1.0 + Up to 1.0 FAR excepted for Affordable Housing Max. Bldg. Ht. – 75 ft. (about 5-6 stories) EG-TOD dimensions

  22. Office Limited Business District 2 (OLB 2). The purpose of the OLB 2 District is to provide an area of integrated complexes made up of offices, hotels, or motels, eating and drinking establishments, and retail sales within walking distance to support business and employees. The OLB 2 District has greater intensity and a larger mix of uses than the OLB District. Such districts are located in areas that abut and have convenient access to freeways, major highways, and transit. FAR – 1.0 Max. Bldg. Ht. – 75 ft. (about 5-6 stories) EG-TOD dimensions

  23. Transition Area Design District • Applies to OLB 2 and NMU where they • are adjacent to a residential district • NMU, OLB 2 45/75 ft. • Landscape Buffer – Usually 20 ft. • Usually may not exceed max. height of receiving district • Mechanical equipment in mech. room • Conformance Amendments • Ensures that the new amendments • conform with the code. Max. Height for OLB 2 or NMU OLB 2 or NMU Residential District Transition area design district

More Related