1 / 12

2011 Health Priorities

2011 Health Priorities. Academic Health Programs Health/Biomedical Research. 2011 Health Request. From Health Planning Group Process: 30 Health Academic and Research Proposals Considered Total $3,651,000 25 Recommended to MAUs, in Priority Order Total Recommended $ 2,895,300

dorit
Download Presentation

2011 Health Priorities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2011 Health Priorities Academic Health Programs Health/Biomedical Research

  2. 2011 Health Request • From Health Planning Group Process: • 30 Health Academic and Research Proposals Considered • Total $3,651,000 • 25 Recommended to MAUs, in Priority Order • Total Recommended $2,895,300 • 5Not Recommended • Total Not Recommended $755,700 • Planning Group Recommendations, by MAU: • Multi-Campus/MAU Serving: 10 • UAA 8 • UAF 7 • UAS 0 (1 in Multi-MAU Serving Category)

  3. 2011 Health Request • MAU Decisions: • Tier 1 • Academic Health $1,814,400 • Health/Biomedical Research $616,100 • Total Tier 1 $2,430,500 • Tier 2 • Academic Health $924,500 • Health/Biomedical Research $200,000 • Total Tier 2 $1,124,500 • Total from MAUs • 29 Proposals $3,555,000

  4. Central Themes • Reaffirm and use FY11 BOR priorities • Complete half funded increments at UAF (due to appropriation structure) • Combine health research and academic requests into one process • Prioritize INBRE 2 non federal commitments (roughly $600K) • Focus on high demand professions with large vacancies: e.g. dietetics, occupational therapy, ultrasound, pharmacy, physical therapy

  5. Central Themes, continued • Secure industry-related AHEC funds—Providence Hospital, Fairbanks Memorial Hospital, Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation, Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium • Through sustained commitment, we have virtually finished moving academic programs off soft funds (MHTAAR and Denali Commission)

  6. Health Planning Process • Proposals received from MAUs • Discussion of academic and research proposals by planning group via VTC • Tiers created at meeting • Individuals’ prioritization ofeach tier • Summary of individual priorities • Biomedical Subcabinet review of research proposals • Priorities provided to MAUs • MAUs decisions about priorities included in budget requests

  7. Planning Group Participants • John Blake, UAF • Sandra Carroll-Cobb, UAA • Cheryl Easley,UAA • Anita Hartman, UAF • Invited, participated in priority-setting • Jim Liszka, UAA • Pete Pinney, UAF • Karen Perdue, UA • Karen Schmitt, UAS • Jan Harris - Facilitator

  8. Evaluation Considerations • Data driven - industry vacancy data, Department of Labor projections, student and program data • State/industry need for program or expansion • Consistent with the Health Academic Plan • Cost of program/change • Employer partners/site readiness – availability of clinical experiences • Program readiness – faculty, curricular, resources, other • Student readiness – student prospects, enrollment management • Induced course load/GER capacity – availability of pre-requisites • Fit with health package; package total within budget parameters • Balance of selected proposals – topical, academic level, geographic

  9. Proposals Recommended by Health Planning Committee Bold, Red – Tier 1 by MAU

  10. Recommended Proposals, Continued Bold, Red – Tier 1 by MAU

  11. Facility Requirements • Facilities • TVC 4th floor completion • Health Science Building Phase II • Continued Development/Enhancement of Skills and Science Labs • Technology and Equipment • Technology Upgrades for Distance Education • Simulation Technology – planning underway • Equipment Purchase for HSB Phase I • Other Equipment Needs

  12. Next Steps • Continue to track 2009 and 2010 health package initiatives • Establish INBRE-2 • Complete 2009 health vacancy study • Work on AWIB health workforce plan • Update statewide health academic plan • Prepare 3-5 year priorities and timeline

More Related