1 / 30

Considerations for Planning, Acquiring, and Processing LIDAR Data for Forestry Applications

Considerations for Planning, Acquiring, and Processing LIDAR Data for Forestry Applications. Robert J. McGaughey USDA Forest Service--PNW Research Station Hans-Erik Andersen University of Washington-Precision Forestry Cooperative Stephen E. Reutebuch USDA Forest Service--PNW Research Station.

don
Download Presentation

Considerations for Planning, Acquiring, and Processing LIDAR Data for Forestry Applications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Considerations for Planning, Acquiring, and Processing LIDAR Data for Forestry Applications Robert J. McGaughey USDA Forest Service--PNW Research Station Hans-Erik Andersen University of Washington-Precision Forestry Cooperative Stephen E. Reutebuch USDA Forest Service--PNW Research Station Pacific Northwest Research Station-Silviculture and Forest Models Team University of Washington-Precision Forestry Cooperative

  2. Outline • Brief LIDAR overview • LIDAR data characteristics & deliverables • QA/QC procedures • Data processing • Introduction of FUSION software • Conclusions

  3. LIDAR • Light Detection and Ranging • 4 types • Atmospheric • Continuous waveform • Discrete return (profiling) • Discrete return (scanning) • Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) • Discrete return (scanning) mounted on aircraft

  4. ALS System Components • Scanning laser emitter-receiver unit • Differentially-corrected GPS • Inertial measurement unit (IMU) • Computer to control the system monitor mission progress • Interesting targets

  5. Multiple Returns • Many laser systems can record several returns for each pulse • Multiple returns occur when the laser beam is only partially blocked • Part of the laser energy is reflected back to the sensor • The remaining laser energy continues downward • Up to 5 returns per pulse • Typically only 2-3 returns • Many systems record the amount of energy reflected by target objects • Intensity (near-infrared, 1064 nm)

  6. Multiple Returns All returns (16,664 pulses) 1st returns 2nd returns (4,385 pulses, 26%) 3rd returns (736 pulses, 4%) 4th returns (83 pulses, <1%)

  7. Comparison With Other Remote Sensing Technologies • Active sensor • Laser pulse is emitted and reflected energy is measured • Passive systems rely on reflected solar energy • Returns are actual measurements • Range is computed based on round-trip travel time for laser energy • Combined with accurate aircraft position and attitude to produce XYZ point measurement • Small footprint at target • 30-100 cm footprint at ground surface • 4+ pulses/m2 is common • Multiple returns over porous targets

  8. LIDAR Accuracy • RMSE provided by LIDAR system manufacturers • 10-15cm vertical • 50-100cm horizontal • Several studies provide independent verification of these values • Ground survey points • Tree heights • Building heights • Alignment of power transmission lines

  9. LIDAR DEM Bare-Earth Accuracy • Mean LIDAR DEM error • 22 cm…9-inch field boot height! • Maximum errors: • +1.3 meter, -0.63 meter…(+4.3 ft, -2.1 ft) • Error is not significantly affected by canopy density

  10. LIDAR Data Characteristics • High spatial resolution • Typical density is 0.5-6 pulses/m2 • 2-3 returns/pulse in forest areas • Surface/canopy models typically 1-5m grid • Large volume of data • 5,000-60,000 pulses/hectare • 12,500-150,000 returns/hectare • 0.3-3.6 Gigabyte/hectare

  11. “Typical” Mission Specifications

  12. Deliverables:General Considerations • Delivery format • Return data, surfaces, images, GIS coverages • Can you read the format? • Does the data contain all the information you need? • Delivery media • External hard drives are common but not easy to backup to more stable media • You would like to be able to retrieve single data files from your backup • What do you do with multiple DVDs? • How do you know what has been delivered? • Contracts need to include specific deliverables to help you assess overall data quality and completeness • Deliverables based on the actual data…not just coverage area boundaries • Do you have adequate storage space to move data onto faster devices? • Disk space • Bandwidth

  13. Deliverables:Common Data Products • Metadata • Flight information • LIDAR system settings • Data coverage • Bare ground products • Bare-ground returns • Surface models • Return data • Coarse filtering to remove outliers • Includes return number • Always get the return data for a project • Adds very little to contract cost • Will cost you $$ if you decide you want it later

  14. Deliverables:Forestry-Specific Products • Canopy height models • Normalized using bare-ground surface • Filtered to remove buildings, powerlines, and other above-ground features • Canopy cover maps • Presence/absence of vegetation • Vegetation density (percent cover) • Geo-referenced LIDAR intensity images • First return intensity value (reflected energy) • Useful an “image” (B/W IR image) • Useful as a layer for further analysis

  15. QA/QC Assessment:Did you get what you ordered? • Initial delivery: • Missing data • Missing returns • Misclassified returns • Tile naming inconsistencies • Contractor used custom software to produce ASCII formatted data • Several flight lines were omitted • They had no way to view the ASCII files • They didn’t know what they delivered • Over 60 client-hours to sort out the problems • Contractor made 3 deliveries over a 5-week period

  16. QA/QC Assessment:Quality and Completeness

  17. Data Processing:What do I do with all these points? Raw data are interesting to look at but require extensive processing to create useful information

  18. Data Processing:Bare-Earth Surface Model

  19. Data Processing:Canopy Surface Model

  20. Final Products:Canopy Height (Raw Data)

  21. Final Products:Percent Cover (2.5m grid)

  22. Final Products:LIDAR Intensity Image (5m grid) 1m grid

  23. Coniferous/Deciduous Classification Using Intensity Values (Raw Data)

  24. LDV Data viewer FUSION Data interface Sample options • Shape & size • Coloring rules • Snap to POI Color Motion Tree data Canopy model Lighting Glyph Image Bare-earth model PDQ Simple Data viewer Measurement Command line processing and utility programs LIDAR data Hotspots Points of interest (POI) FUSION Software

  25. FUSION Software • Displays several kinds of data • Allows users to interactively select portions of large datasets for viewing • Users can “mine” the data to discover new information • Clips all data layers and makes them available for detailed 3D viewing • Supports stereoscopic viewing • Runs on a current hardware • Available through RSAC…included on DVD you were given at registration…demos on Thursday

  26. Main System components • FUSION – 2D interface to several data types • Allows extraction of data subsets • Interacts with LDV to display samples • Includes tools to develop images using LIDAR point cloud (colored by elevation or intensity) • LDV – 3D data visualization • Very interactive • Provides a variety of display options • Allows direct measurement in data • Provides structured measurement protocol for measuring tree attributes • Provides analysis framework for prototyping analysis strategies

  27. Conclusions • LIDAR can help foresters characterize spatial variability in forest conditions at resolutions beyond our wildest dreams • Cost is decreasing while LIDAR system capabilities are increasing • Analysis procedures are being defined and refined

  28. Conclusions • The number of commercial LIDAR providers is increasing • More competition, more work, more interest in uses other than bare-earth modeling • Large LIDAR acquisitions are underway • Foresters and other resource specialists need to be “at the table” when decisions regarding data specifications are made • Raw return data is always valuable even if the analysis tools and methods are not fully mature • FUSION will be demonstrated Thursday

More Related