Loading in 5 sec....

Transit Estimation and Mode SplitPowerPoint Presentation

Transit Estimation and Mode Split

- By
**dom** - Follow User

- 203 Views
- Uploaded on

Download Presentation
## PowerPoint Slideshow about '' - dom

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

### Transit Estimation and Mode Split

### Homework Probabilistic Models

### If we had time … Calculate the number of trips by mode using the probabilities calculated.

### Cheaper to lease cars than provide new transit? Calculate the number of trips by mode using the probabilities calculated.

### Transit share dropping? Calculate the number of trips by mode using the probabilities calculated.

### Where rail transit works Calculate the number of trips by mode using the probabilities calculated.

### You can see an alternative view here: Calculate the number of trips by mode using the probabilities calculated.

CE 451/551

Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7

Terminology

- HOV
- Light Rail Portland; Florence
- Heavy rail
- Commuter rail
- Local bus service
- Express bus service
- Paratransit service
- Busways
- Headways/frequency
- Transit captive

Factors Affecting Mode Split

- Person/household characteristics
- Auto availability, income, HH size, life cycle

- Trip characteristics
- Purpose, chaining, time of departure, OD, length

- Land use characteristics
- Sidewalk/ped facilities, mix of uses at both ends, distance to transit, parking and costs at both ends, density at both ends

- Service characteristics
- Facility design (HOV, bikes), frequency, congestion, cost (parking, tolls, fares, out-of-pocket costs), stop spacing

Mode Split Model Applications

- Route or service changes
- effect of changes in cost, frequency, transfer system, more or less service and routes
- Not usually modeled with TDF (use analogy or elasticity)

- Major investment studies, e.g. HOV, New rail or other capital investment project design
- Policy changes
- Parking, urban growth boundaries, congestion pricing

Mode Split Strategies

- Analogy
- Elasticity Analysis
- Direct Estimation of Transit Share
- Disaggregate Mode Split

Choosing a Mode Split Technique

- Application
- Time and budget constraints
- Project costs
- Existing data availability
- Existing service?
- if none, have to “borrow” a model

Selecting Analogy Routes

- Selection based on similarities in:
- Household characteristics
- Transit service

- Adjustments
- Service area household characteristics
- Service differences
- Fare differences

Elasticities: ratio of change in demand over change in system

Example of Elasticity

- If transit fares are raised from $1.00 to $1.25 and there is a resulting drop in daily transit ridership from 8,000 to 7,200, the elasticity, as calculated below, would be -0.40

Elasticity analysis example

- What does the –0.4 factor mean?
- typical values for cities range from
-0.15 to -0.4

- Is this elastic, or inelastic?
- Do you think larger cities would have larger or smaller elasticity? Why?

Direct Estimation of Transit Share

- In small-to-medium regions with limited transit use
- Particularly when transit use is limited to specific populations (zero-car household, students, and elderly)
- Generally estimate district-to-district transit share
- Find relationship between SE&D and %transit
- Calibrate for base year
- Assume relationship will hold in future

- Subtract resulting transit trips from person trip table.

Disaggregate Mode Split Models

- Travel is a result of choices
- Elasticity, analogy, and direct estimation of transit share are limited, particularly in policy analysis
- Output
- Share of person trips using each mode (by trip purpose) for each production-attraction cell.

Disaggregate Mode Split Models

Utility functions

Building blocks for DMS models

Rank desirability of the alternate transportation modes

Deterministic equations

Probability models (overcomes limitations of deterministic utility functions)

Logit the most common

Incorporate utility equations into probabilistic equations

Binomial logit models

Predict choice between two alternatives

Multinomial logit models

Predict choice between more than two alternatives

Disaggregate mode split using Utility Functions and Probabilistic Models

- Input: Individual responses on mode desirability and usage to develop “Utility functions”
- Preference and usage data may be from census or special home surveys.
- System data such as travel time and cost generally from network data
- usually don’t have the kind of data needed to know all users preferences

Observation v. prediction Probabilistic Models

- If we wish to estimate transit by income level (or other detailed variable) in the future we need to be able to forecast the population characteristic in each group.
- The more disaggregate the data set for modeling, the more difficult the prediction of future.

Just like trip generation and distribution … can you give examples?

Probability Equations Probabilistic Models

Binomial Logit Model Example Probabilistic Models

Auto Utility Equation: UA= -0.025(IVT) -0.050(OVT) - 0.0024(COST)

Transit Utility Equation: UB= -0.025(IVT) -0.050(OVT) – 0.10(WAIT) – 0.20(XFER) - 0.0024(COST)

Where:

IVT= in-vehicle time in minutes

OVT = out of vehicle time in minutes

COST = out of pocket cost in cents

WAIT = wait time (time spent at bus stop waiting for bus)

XFER = number of transfers

Question: what is the implied cost of IVT? OVT? WAIT? XFER?

References Probabilistic Models

- Transit Fact Book, 50th ed, American Public Transit Association, Washington, D.C. January 1999.
- Federal Highway Administration. Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes. 2nd ed, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., July 1981.
- Federal Transit Administration, A Self-Instructinf Course in Disaggregate Mode Choice Modeling. Report No. DOT-T-93-19. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., December 1986
- Meyer, M.D., and E.J. Miller. Urban Transportation Planning, A Decision-Oriented Approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, 2001.

Mode OVT IVT Cost (cents) Probabilistic Models

1 person 5 17 200.0

2-person carpool 5 21 100.0

3-person carpool 5 23 66.6

4-person carpool 5 25 50.0

Transit 7 33 160.0

Part 1: CALCULATE MODE PROBABILITIES BY MARKET SEGMENT Probabilistic Models

- Overview: Calculate the mode probabilities for the trip interchanges. Use the tables on the next pages.
- Part A: Calculate the utilities for transit as follows:
- Insert in the table the appropriate values for OVT, IVT, and COST.
- Calculate the utility relative to each variable by multiplying the variable by the coefficient which is shown in parenthesis at the top of the column; and
- Sum the utilities (including the mode-specific constant) and put the total in the last column.

- Part B: Calculate the mode probabilities as follows:
- Insert the utility for transit in the first column;
- Calculate eU for transit
- Sum of eU for transit and put in the “Total” column; and
- Calculate the probability for transit using the formula:
- Sum the probabilities (they should equal 1.0)

Say, from trip distribution, the number of trips was 14,891. Calculate the number of trips by mode using the probabilities calculated.

Mode Trips (Zone 5 to Zone 1)

Source: publicpurpose.com

http://www.publicpurpose.com/ut-2000rail.htm

http://www.publicpurpose.com/ut-intlmkt95.htm

http://www.publicpurpose.com/utx-rails.htm

http://www.sprawlwatch.org/

Download Presentation

Connecting to Server..