170 likes | 253 Views
Study by Sookyung Choi and Stephen L. Olsen on the expected mass and decay modes of the hc state, exploring narrow decay channels with low background for signals. Utilizing event selection criteria and particle identification techniques to identify the hc' state properties. Experimental data analysis reveals promising results for the hc' state.
E N D
‘ Evidence for the hc Sookyung Choi Gyeongsang University & Stephen L. Olsen University of Hawaii
‘ Expected mass of the hc 3Dc3 3Dc1 3Dc2 cc level diagram: y’ ?? D’=??? 1h1? ‘ hc cc0,1,2 D=117 MeV J/y hc potential model: close to they’ expect M(hc’) 3.62~3.64 GeV
Expected widths/decay modes • Similar to hc • narrow (but not like the J/y) • 10< G< 20~30 MeV • ~same decay channels • Search in a channel with strong hc signal but absent in y’ decays
Search in hc’KSK±pchannel • Br(hcK0K-p+) is respectable (2%) • all charged particles (s(DE) 13 MeV) • low combinatoric background • noy’ background (Br(y’K0K-p+)<10-4 • Br(y’K0Kp)<Br(J/yK0Kp)/30
Event selection Use expts 7 thru 13; b20010523_0725 library • Skim Hadron B: • R2<0.35 • 2chrgd K’s; 1chrgd p; 1KS • Mbc>5.2 GeV; |DE|<0.2 GeV • |cosqthrust| < 0.9 between B and rest of evnt • all candidate tracks constrained to IP
Charged kaon selection • K/p-id: atcpid(3,1,5)>0.6 • p/K-id: atcpid(3,1,5)<0.95 • m veto: m_likelihood < 0.9 • e veto: eid_prob(3,-1,5)<0.9 • CDC hits: Nax8 ; Nster3 • vertex : dr<0.3 ; |dz|<2.2
Charged pion selection • K/p-id: atcpid(3,1,5)<0.4 • p/p-id: atcpid(3,1,5)<0.9 • e veto: eid_prob(3,-1,5)<0.95 • CDC hits: Nax8 ; Nster3 • vertex : dr<0.3 ; |dz|<2.2
KSp+p- selection • flight-length > 0.3 • |Df| <0.2 • |Mpp – MKs|< 12 MeV • if both trks have SVD hits: • Zdist<1.2 • otherwise: • Zdist<10 ; dr>0.015 ; |Df|<0.1
continuum-bkgd suppression • Fisher • 5 SFW moments • cosqthrust • S|pt|particles with qthrust>60o • cosqB B candidate production angle L = PDF( fisher ) x PDF(cosqB)
Fisher SFW cosqthrust S|pt| use: R 2,4 & R 2,3,4 major maj minor
Likelihood Ratio Fisher cosqB cut LR = Lsig/(Lsig+ Lqq)
K* and charm veto • 0 -+ 1–-- 0-+ suppressed by an angular • hc K* K momentum barrier • backgrounds commonly have K*’s • veto events with K*: • |MKp – M K* |>50 MeV • also veto events with charm: • |MKp – M D |>10 MeV • |MKKs – M Ds |>10 MeV
Look at K KsK+p- combinations Select events in the DE Mbc signal box
M(KSK+p-) for signal-box evts (B+ K+ KS K+p- + B0KS KSK+p- combined) 1.5-entries/evnt 2-entries/evnt 100 evts 38 evts ? 28 evts “hc’ ” properties • M = 3653 ± 9 MeV • G= 30 +44 MeV • S = 3.8s -?? NB: N(y’KSKp)<N(J/yKSKp)/30 1evt
Do slice fits: 3.55 GeV 6±4 evts 3.60 GeV 13± 4 evts 26±6 evts 3.65 GeV (S=5.2s) 16± 5 evts 3.70 GeV 4 ± 4 evts 3.75 GeV
Slice fit results BW with M =3653 & G = 30 MeV; not a fit! Poor agreement maybe due to the coarseness (50MeV) of the slice-fit bins
Summary 3625<MKSKp<3675 MeV • We observe a 5.2s signal for BK KSK+p- near 3650 MeV. • This cannot be the y’ • Most likely this is BKhc’ with: • Mhc’ = 3653 ± 9 MeV • Ghc’ = 30 +44 MeV • This disagrees with the Crystal-Ball result Mhc’=3594±5 MeV but agrees with potential models. -?? Mbc