150 likes | 319 Views
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT Luis Miguel Neto 2012. RESOURCES+PERSONS+PRACTICES (adapt. de Pearce, 1991). RESOURCES: ideas, materials, ‘ media ’. PERSONS. PRATICES: Modus operandi , dinamics.
E N D
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT Luis Miguel Neto 2012
RESOURCES+PERSONS+PRACTICES (adapt. de Pearce, 1991) RESOURCES: ideas, materials, ‘media’ PERSONS PRATICES: Modus operandi, dinamics
ISCSPSocial PsychologySummary 1st ClassFebruary 28th, 20121 .Program, goals, and dynamic assessment (s): What is a ‘performative text’?2. Resources + people + practices (adapted from Pearce, 1991): how are the systemic analysis and the coordinated management of meaning model adapted to teaching and research in social psychology?3. Experiential laboratory 1 (in pairs): describe an episode - ‘Me at my best'?4.Experiential laboratory 2 (group): How to have expert knowledge without having the 'Truth'? (adapted from Cottor et al. 2004).5.How to Test the Scientific Paradigms experientially (TPCEs)? Positive Goods, Services & Products (choose), or YouTube (an international selection on Social Psychology) or Reflexion on the Experiential Lab 2.
Program Topics 1. Historical Perspective of Social Psychology.Psychology and Social PsychologyThe Origins of Social PsychologyThe field of social psychology.2. Processes of Social Influence.Groups and standards.Consensus and conformity.Obedience.The influence of minorities.Social expectations.3. Social Development.The Attachment.Socialization and Social Learning.The Social and Moral Development of the Adult.
4. Attitudes.Formation of attitudes.Models of spontaneous vs. deliberative processes.Attitudes and behaviors.Communication, persuasion and attitude change.5. Impression Formation and Causal Attribution.The social inference.Formation and change of perspectives.Classical models of causal attribution.The spontaneous inference of traits.6. Uncertainty in Judgment and Decision Making.The bounded rationality of human beings.Cognitive models of mental functioning.The mental heuristics.
7. Social identity and intergroup relations.Social categorization and social identity.Intergroup bias and the effect of exo-group homogeneityThe management of identity and social change. Strategies for reduction of intergroup conflict.8. Social stereotypes.Stereotypes, prejudice and discrimination.Implicit stereotypes and the effect of pervasive stereotypes.The change of stereotypes.The reduction of prejudice and discrimination.9. Social interaction and interdependence.The Prisoner's Dilemma.The social dilemmas.Networking and Social Networking.
The evaluation method is defined upon the Regulation approved by the Pedagogical Council.The assessment is based on an applied written work with a weight of 50% (for the individual component) and 30% (for the component work group). The remaining 20% include weekly assignments and presence in class.Alternatively, the evaluation might be constituted by a final individual written exam for those who do not choose continuous assessment.
THEMATIC CONTENTS OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGYFrom McKinlay and McVittie (2008)1. Identity and self: identity, conversational, cultural, national, community, male, female, other ethnic, virtual. What are 'identity crisis'?2. Groups: Groups and social representations, cohesion, structure, functions. Groups and personal identity: what type of coordination?3. Interpersonal attraction and relationships: family, friends, colleagues, neighbors. What are 'relationship problems‘?4. Social cognition: Mental states, memory, attribution, categorization, management of impressions. Cognition and social change: what kind of relationship?
5. Attitudes and Persuasion: How is do we experience persuasion in everyday life?6. Prejudice: Speech and prejudice, prejudice, and ethnicity / race, prejudice and gender / sex. Can words hurt?7. Aggression: Conflict in speech, accountability and justification for the overt and hidden aggression. Is it useful to discriminate the 'origin of evil'?8. Justice and Law: Social psychology and police investigations, court testimony. Treatment of the accused. Did they ever solved the 'crime'?9. Health: Support Groups, interaction professionals / users, Lifestyle and behavior change. How heavy is social psychology in the health budget?10. Social Psychology and organizations: Analysis of discourse in organizations, leadership and decision making, difficulties in employment. Organizations and society. How can the human resource manager 'enjoy' social psychology?
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 2012: additions to the Bibliography1. Historical and paradigmatic: It is useful to know the past to go into the future?Blumer, H. (1956). Sociological Analysis and the "Variable", American Sociological Review, 21, 6, 483-691.Gergen, K. (1973). Social Psychology as History, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 2, 309-320.Mckinlay, A. and McVittie C. (2008). Social Psychology and Discourse. UK: John Wiley and Sons.Kruglanski, A. and Stroebe W., (2012). Handbook of the History of Social Psychology. Psychology Press: New York.2. For practical purposes: There is nothing so theoretical - = transformer - as a good practice?Cottor, R., Asher, A., Levin, J., Weiser, C. (2004). Experiential Learning Exercises in Social Construction: A Field Book for Creating Change. USA: TAOS Institute Publications.Lagemaat Richard van der (2005). Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
General bibliographicreferences Gleitman, H. (2003). Psicologia. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. Leyens, J.-P. & Yzerbyt, V. (1999). Psicologia Social. Lisboa: Edições 70. Lopes, M.P., Palma, P.J., Ribeiro, R.B., & Cunha, M.P. (Coord.) (2011). Psicologia Aplicada. Lisboa: RH Editora. Lopes, M.P., & Cunha, M.P. (2011). O Mundo é Pequeno. Lisboa: Actual Editora. Smith, E.R. & Mackie, D.M. (1995). Social Psychology. New York: Worth Publishers.
3. Zimbardo, P. (2007). The Lucifer Effect: How Good People Turn to Evil. EUA: Randon House Inc. Peterson, C. (2006). A Primer in Positive Psychology. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press. 4. Nobre, C. (2003). Aplicação do Modelo da Gestão Coordenada do Sentido (CMM) ao Estudo de Um Episódio em Contexto Terapêutico. Manuscrito não publicado. Neto, L.M., (2003). Dez questões sobre o Modelo Comunicacional da Gestão Coordenada do Sentido (CMM). Pensar Enfermagem, 7, 1, 22-31.
ISCSP SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012LABORATORY EXPERIENTIAL # 127022012Article published in the Arizona Republic on January 16, 1996Fort au Prince, Haiti. Residents of an isolated village of fishermen led to death five people who claimed to be sorcerers responsible for the deaths of several people, the police reported on Tuesday. The attack was made early on Monday in the village of Corail. The police investigator Max Harry Isaac said that the police in the nearby town of Jeremie arrived on the scene after the crowd had murdered five people. Before the attack, villagers shut themselves in their homes shielding doors and windows to not allow the evil spirits to enter.Part I: report of what happened in the perspective of:A - Villagers (do not directly implicated in the murders);B- A crowd of attackers;C- People that were killed, alleged witches;D- Police;E- Malevolent spirits.
ISCSP Leaders from every perspective: Former No. "We are the police and our perspective of the incident is ..."Part II: Sub groups remain intact, but now another perspective:F-metaphysical Academy of Sciences (group interested in abstract thought about existence, causality, true);G-Missionaries (forward interested in religion);H-AnthropologistsI - Forensic InvestigatorsJ-'Club B' (group with interests in development. Tour)Part III: (Re) formulating the article after the initial inputs of the prospects A - JPart IV: Questions for reflection and analysisHow I felt during the different phases of the 'laboratory'? I changed my mind? The inputs that was sensitive? What is my final choice?The process group's results? What stuck Points and how they have solved?What is the use of generic personal and professional experiential lab?Where and how can I adapt it and make it useful?
HomeworkGOOD, PRODUCT and / or positive SERVICE (brief description of 500 words), orSelection YOUTUBE video on social psychology, particularly if carried out by student (s). Comment briefly (500 words). Experiential lab: Comment on usefulness (500 words)