1 / 30

Peering BOF – Peering Personal

Peering BOF – Peering Personal. NANOG 25 Richmond Hill, CA June 10, 2002. Redneck Horseshoes. What is this?. Moo Shoe Pork. Smaller ISP getting Peering with Large ISP: The Cajoling Tactic. Teaser for “The Art of Peering” Research.

diem
Download Presentation

Peering BOF – Peering Personal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Peering BOF – Peering Personal NANOG 25 Richmond Hill, CA June 10, 2002

  2. Redneck Horseshoes

  3. What is this? Moo Shoe Pork

  4. Smaller ISP getting Peering with Large ISP: The Cajoling Tactic

  5. Teaser for “The Art of Peering” Research • When e-mail to peering@<ispdomain>.net generates no response, what do Peering Coordinators do? • Document the “Tricks of the Trade” • Enumerate Tactics to Obtain Peering when otherwise might not be able to. “A must-read for Peering Coordinators” -- Eric Anderson (Concert)

  6. P? APC APC A APC APC BS BPC B BS BPC T? Graphical Representation of Methods To Portray Peering Plays Pictorially… P?=Peering Request w/ Peering Coordinator Peering Negotiation T?=Transit Request To Sales Person Transit Negotiations A B ISP Initiator ISP Target P? ISP B Customers ISP A Customers T? $ $ Larger Circle=More Customer Prefixes Thicker Lines=More Traffic

  7. T A A A A P B B B B Transit and Peering Sessions T=Established Transit Session (Selling Access to entire Internet) Size indicates effective size of transport Supporting the session P=Established Peering Session (Reciprocal Access to each others customers) Size indicates effective size of transport Supporting the session $ T $ Represents “the rest of the Internet” P Graphical Display of Routing Announcements

  8. T A A A A P B B B B Traffic over Transit and Peering Sessions $ Traffic showed as directed lines Thickness of line indicates amount of Traffic in relevant direction T $ Other Variations P->T = Transition of Relationship P | T = Either Peering or Transit apply = Traffic destined anywhere = Fictitious Traffic = Packet Loss ridden Traffic = Traffic destined to green network = Traffic destined to brown network P

  9. Other Graphical Symbols Peering Point Exchange Point, Telco Hotel Tied with Indicates two or more Elements tied with relationship or Indicates a ordering, A sequence to be followed In the Peering Play

  10. $ $ $ T T T P P P A APC A P? T T T $ T T T $ $ L G BPC B G L G L B $ $ $ A forces traffic Over B’s transit 1 MONTH LATER Contact PC-We should Peer! 9)In the Traffic Manipulation tactic, ISPs or content players force traffic along the network path that makes peering appear most cost effective. CH ISP i.e.Yahoo! B hears A’s route ‘for free’ through Peer L

  11. ANOC BNOC 18)The False Peering Outage tactic involves deceiving an ill-equipped NOC into believing a non-existing peering session is down. Peering Point X ANOC: Hey – Emergency! ANOC: Our Peering Session with you Went Down! BNOC: Strange. <looks on router> I don’t see it configured. ANOC: It was. Don’t make me escalate to <famous person> BNOC: Ah – I bet is was that last config run that trashed it. BNOC: Give me a few minutes to fix it on both ends.

  12. P APC A A APC BS B B BS 19) The Leverage Broader Business Arrangement takes advantage of other aspects of the relationship between two companies to obtain peering in exchange for something else. P? Peering Tied with “Other” +Fiber deal +Dial-in deal +Racks +Transport +Strategic deal : P? Tied with Other

  13. Motivations for Peering • Notable: Cable Cos (formerly behind Excite@Home) • Kazaa • The most difficult part of Peering… • Open Peering Dominates

  14. Icons Peering • To indicate willingness to peer Goal: Match up Peering Policies Maximize # of Peering Session • First run at GPF III in Dallas, TX • Second run at NANOG 23 in Oakland, CA • Stepwise Evolution…

  15. Peering Policy Icons Access Heavy Content Heavy Open Peering Peering w/Content OK Large Traffic to Exchange Contract Required for Peering

  16. Large Traffic Flows “We have huge volumes of traffic (lots of users and/or lots of content) (Huge: > 1 Gbps total outbound traffic to peers and transit providers)” Example:

  17. Content Peering OK “Peering with Content Players or Content Heavy ISPs is OK by us” Example: GlobalNaps

  18. Eyeballs Example: “We are Access-Heavy”

  19. Open Peering Policy Open Peering Example: “We will peer with anyone In any single location.”

  20. Some Peering PreReqs • If not completely open, assume some pre reqs: • Common Prereqs: • Multiple Geographical Locations Required • Traffic Volume Minimums Required • Bribe needed

  21. Content Heavy “We are Content Heavy”

  22. Contract Required “We require written contracts for peering”

  23. Just Getting Started with Peering ISP A

  24. 2-3 minutes per Peering Coordinator • Say a few words about 1) Your Network (incl. AS#) 2) Your Ideal Peer? Why Peer with you? 3) Which IXes are you in? Which IXes are you considering?

  25. Done Manually Now evolved to Peering Personal Program Simple Rules: Eyeballs love Content Content loves eyeballs Some eyeballs will peer with content Some content will peer with content Run Peering Personals

  26. Peering Personals pg. 1 Daniel McGillicuddy Nemo Semret Mike Salafia/Tricia Tsai Blake Williams Karthik Arumugham GlobalNaps Access Heavy Open Peering Content Heavy Contract Req. Peering w/Content OK Large Traffic to Exchange

  27. Peering Personals pg. 2 Scott Sneddon Alex Ponnath Paul Nguyen Ren Nowlin Jeffrey Papen Access Heavy Open Peering Content Heavy Contract Req. Peering w/Content OK Large Traffic to Exchange

  28. Peering Personals pg. 3 Doug Toye Troy Davis Gary James Joe Provo Tatsuo Sato Access Heavy Open Peering Content Heavy Contract Req. Peering w/Content OK Large Traffic to Exchange

  29. Peering Personals pg. 4 Mitchell Rose Jeb Linton Phillip Chan Ian Neale Dwight Ringdahl Access Heavy Open Peering Content Heavy Contract Req. Peering w/Content OK Large Traffic to Exchange

  30. Peering Personals pg. 5 Glen Larwill Access Heavy Open Peering Content Heavy Contract Req. Peering w/Content OK Large Traffic to Exchange

More Related