260 likes | 332 Views
Explore the advantages and disadvantages of merging maternity units, the evidence on unit sizes, and the impact on patient outcomes and care quality in maternity services. Discover how mergers can affect neonatal care and obstetric services, as well as the implications for staff and service delivery.
E N D
Trust/maternity mergers A threat to patient safety? Jim Thornton, Nottingham Doctors for Reform
Advantages of larger units • Easier staffing • Increase consultant hours • Smoothing peaks and troughs • Decreased need for neonatal transfer • Training opportunities • Savings on running costs • Permits choice
Disadvantages • Less convenient for patients • Increased capital/reorganisation costs • Co-ordination/communication difficulties • Fewer staff at peak activity times • Impersonal • Reduced choice/competition
Shared care unit 6000 births MLU 1000 births Shared care unit A 3,500 births Shared care unit B 3,500 births Choice? Two meanings
Size v. quality Better quality No. of deliveries
Optimum size • Midwifery/normal labour – small • Obstetrics/abnormal labour – medium • Neonatology – large
Best for who? • Patients • Providers
The evidence • Comparative studies of different sized units • Unit size in different countries • Other inter country comparisons • Reports on mergers
Size of maternity units UK (000s of deliveries per annum) Department of Health 2004
Sizes of maternity units Europe Wildman et al 2003 & Natl. stats.
Largest maternity units • England • Liverpool 8,084 deliveries • Belgium • 2,641 deliveries • Germany • Humbolt, Berlin 3,000+ deliveries • France • Jeanne de Flandre, Lille 4,000+ deliveries
Evidence for large units 1 • Hesse, Germany - neonatal mortality • “Small” units 3 X “large” ones • Heller et al 2002
Evidence for large units 2 • Norway - low risk pregnancies • Lowest combined perinatal and neonatal mortality in units with 2-3,000 deliveries per annum • > 3,000 dels. = 30% higher death rate. Moster et al. 1999
Substandard care • Euronatal Working Group - Ricardus 2003
Medical presence at delivery • Very low in UK compared with rest of Europe • Midwives v nursing assistants • Good? • Why?
NHS Consultant presence at delivery • Normal delivery – almost unknown • Complex delivery – rare • Complex Caesarean (pl. pr., full diln., <32w, obese, abruption) • Consultant present in 21% • Natl. Caesarean Section Audit. Thomas 2001
NHS Consultant presence on delivery suite • 40 hours per week • 80/207 maternity units in England and Wales RCOG 2005 • Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts level 2 (incl. 40 hours cover) • 18/151 participating units CNST 2004
Special enquiries into maternity services • Northwick Park, London • New Cross, Wolverhampton • Ashford and St Peter's, Surrey Two followed mergers
Merger process • Politically unpopular with general public • MLU often created • ? Genuine need • ? Sop to the public
Trust merger process in general • Important unintended side effects • Interfered with service delivery • No improvement in staff recruitment or retention • Projected financial savings rarely achieved Fulop et. al. BMJ 2002 325: 246
Conclusions • Mergers may improve neonatal care. • Little or no evidence that further mergers will improve obstetric care. • Potentially dangerous
Campaigning groups • Holland • Grass roots and strong but no campaigning • Germany • Doctor initiated, weak, and not campaigning • England • Grass roots, strong and vibrant and campaigning for better care. Tyler 2002
Joint RCOG/ENTER MEETINGRisk Management and Medico-Legal Issues In Women’s Health25 to 26 April 2007