1 / 16

The Elements of Argument

The Elements of Argument. OCSA LCI. Key Terms. Claim : A statement that requires evidence to support it. Previously, you may have called this an opinion or a thesis. Ex: The federal government lends too much money to other nations.

devona
Download Presentation

The Elements of Argument

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Elements of Argument OCSA LCI

  2. Key Terms • Claim: A statement that requires evidence to support it. Previously, you may have called this an opinion or a thesis. • Ex: The federal government lends too much money to other nations. • Premise: A statement or reason offered as support for a claim • Ex: America is in the worse economic crisis since the 1920’s. • Ex: Money that goes to other countries will not go towards our country’s problems: education, social security, medicare, etc. • Conclusion: The claim being supported by a premise or premises • Therefore, we need to stop lending money to other countries and take care of our own fiscal problems.

  3. Key Terms • Argument: A conclusion together with the premises that support it • Reasoning: The process by which one derives a conclusion from a set of premises. This is either OR • Valid: an argument whose premises genuinely support its conclusion • Unsound: an argument that has at least one false premise [an untrue statement]

  4. What did she just say? Inductive Deductive Premises (statements, reasons) Reasoning Conclusion (opinion, thesis) Unsound/ invalid Argument Sound/valid Deductive - facts - generally accepted truths Inductive -inferences - observations

  5. Let’s look at the examples from the gallery walk • Mikhail hails from Russia and all Russians are tall, therefore Mikhail is tall. • Inductive - because the premises are observations. • REASONING  valid but not SOUND: not all Russians are tall. It is not the only conclusion possible and needs more evidence.

  6. #2 • When chimpanzees are exposed to rage, they tend to become violent. Humans are similar to chimpanzees, and therefore they tend to get violent when exposed to rage. • INDUCTIVE  both premises are observations • REASONING  depends on whether you accept the premise that humans are similar to chimpanzees…regardless, this needs more evidence to make the conclusion concrete.

  7. #3 • All men are mortal. Socrates is a man, and therefore he is mortal. • DEDUCTIVE  all facts • REASONING  valid

  8. #4 • The woman in the neighboring apartment has a shrill voice. I can hear a shrill voice from outside, therefore the woman in the neighboring apartment is shouting. • INDUCTIVE because the premises are observations and the conclusion is not concrete. • REASONING  IT IS SOUND because it is possible but we need more evidence that the sound is from the neigboringwoman!

  9. #5 • All the tigers observed in a particular region have yellow black stripes, therefore all the tigers native to this region have yellow stripes. • INDUCTIVE because it is based on observations • REASONING  VALID But! We need more evidence. We need to observe ALL the tigers. And we need proof that these tigers are natives!

  10. #6 • All oranges are fruitsAll fruits grow on treesTherefore, all oranges grow on trees • DEDUCTIVE • REASONING  INVALID because the second premise is FALSE!! Therefore, the entire argument is false.

  11. #7 • All bachelors are singleJohnny is single,Hence, Johnny is a bachelor • DEDUCTIVE because the premises are FACTS and the conclusion is concrete. • REASONING  VALID because if the premises are true, then the conclusion is valid.

  12. Two Traditional Means of Approaching the Thesis deductive reasoning • the thesis appears toward the beginning of the text, then specific details follow in the body of the essay that support this point inductive reasoning • the reader/writer first develops the importance of the point s/he wishes to make, THEN synthesize multiple points to infer a GENERAL thesis

  13. Two Traditional Means of Approaching the Thesis deductive reasoning • commonly associated with “formal logic.” • involves reasoning from known premises, or premises presumed to be true, to a certain conclusion. • the conclusions reached are certain, inevitable, inescapable. inductive reasoning • commonly known as “informal logic,” or “everyday argument” • involves drawing uncertain inferences, based on probable reasoning. • the conclusions reached are probable, reasonable, plausible, believable.

  14. Two Traditional Means of Approaching the Thesis deductive reasoning • Deductive reasoning is either “valid” or “invalid.” A deductive argument can’t be “sort of” valid. • If the reasoning employed in an argument is valid and the argument’s premises are true, then the argument is said to be sound. inductive reasoning • Inductive reasoning enjoys a wide range of probability; it can be plausible, possible, reasonable, credible, etc. • the inferences drawn may be placed on a continuum ranging from cogent at one end to fallacious at the other.

  15. Two Traditional Means of Approaching the Thesis valid reasoning + true premises = sound argument fallacious <---------cogent

  16. Two Traditional Means of Approaching the Thesis

More Related