1 / 34

Ch. 5: Assessment to Facilitate Successful Inclusion

Ch. 5: Assessment to Facilitate Successful Inclusion. KIN 579: Inclusive Practices in P.E. Drew Miller . Objectives. Analyze the ecological approach to assessment vs. traditional assessment Identify and explain the six phases of the ecological assessment process.

derica
Download Presentation

Ch. 5: Assessment to Facilitate Successful Inclusion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ch. 5: Assessment to Facilitate Successful Inclusion KIN 579: Inclusive Practices in P.E. Drew Miller

  2. Objectives • Analyze the ecological approach to assessment vs. traditional assessment • Identify and explain the six phases of the ecological assessment process

  3. Link to YouTube Presentation • This presentation deals with information from Chapter 5 of our textbook which is pages 77-110. • http://youtu.be/okLAGCkUEgM

  4. Assessment • All programming should be tied to ecologically relevant assessment data = skills child needs to be successful in his/her future environment • Should be sensitive to interests of: -Child -even peers -Parents • WITHOUT = decisions are made on irrelevant information/assumptions = inappropriate PE program

  5. Assessment Cont. • CRITICAL, yet often MISUSED part of program • According to IDEA 2004 = part of the IEP process must include assessing all students with disabilities to determine their present level of performance • Used by team to make informed decisions: • Types/intensities of services • Instructional plans • Support • LR placements

  6. Legality of Assessment in P.E. • Regulations by IDEA 2004: describe individualized procedures for assessment and decision making, use of teams rather than one person, and role of parents • http://idea.ed.gov/explore/home

  7. Traditional Approach to Assessment in APE • Classification, Development of IEP, Placement, Instruction • NOT ecological approach

  8. Classification • Determine if APE is needed • Some districts = qualify if they have a particular diagnosis • Students with learning disabilities may have motor learning impairments • Standardized tests: students scores are compared to other students test scores • Many states use set criteria of standardized tests = determine APE • Below 30th percentile or below 50th percentile

  9. BOT • BOT or Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency = most common • Used to measure specific motor abilities of kids aged 4.5-14.5 • Ecologically relevant? Will a student who performs at 20th percentile have difficulty in GPE? • Same with Physical Fitness Best Test

  10. Developing IEP • Already determined need for special services • Important = IEP guides specific activities for year • Traditional = bottom up = standardized tests • Failed test areas = become objectives and focus of IEP • Mostly irrelevant = should be focused on skills needed for GPE or real life situations

  11. Placement • Qualified for services, has IEP, next step is where? • IDEA 2004 mandates Least Restrictive Environment • Students with disabilities must be educated with peers without disabilities • Separate PE should only occur when GPE cannot be satisfactorily achieved with the use of aids and services • Goal = GPE. Assessments to determine how much support is needed

  12. Placement cont. • Most often = decisions either/or. General PE with no support or separate PE. • Decisions tend to focus on placement options rather than support • Domino effect. Classification → IEP → Placement

  13. Instruction • Most relevant part of assessment • How do we reach the goals of IEP? • Usually based on standardized test scores

  14. Checking for Understanding • What are the negative aspects associated with traditional APE assessment? Brainstorm as many as you can.

  15. Ecological Approach • “top down” • Real world approach • Identify future and current recreation environments • Identify skills needed for these environments • This approach is broken down into Six Phases • Figure 5.2 pg. 83

  16. Six Interrelated Phases • Who do we teach (who qualifies for APE)? • What do we teach (long term plan, goals, obj.)? • How do we teach it (instructional planning)? • Where do we teach it (placement decisions)? • Who will teach it (support needs)? • How effective is our program (evaluation)?

  17. What Do We Teach? • Difficult task • School usually does not have a recommended assessment tool or criteria to determine • Usually up to GPE teacher/APE teacher • ECOLOGICALLY RELEVANT! • Elementary: motor skills, fitness, behavior/social skills • Middle/HS: sport skills, fitness, behaviors/social skills

  18. Who Qualifies? • Must have significant impairments in ecologically relevant motor/sport skills and behavior/social skills. • Assessment figure 5.3 pg. 85 • Compare child's motor skill development to his peers w/out disabilities • Key = Is there a significant impairment that keeps student from participating in GPE?

  19. What Do We Teach? • Can't teach everything! • TARGET KEY SKILLS • What skills are critical in student's present/future environments? • Develop vision = dream for child • Target Specific Goals/Objectives: What is important in student's life? Also ask parents. • Student's ability level is not the focus at this point in assessment process

  20. What Do We Teach? Cont. • Determine Present Level of Performance • Don't assess all motor patters = just critical skills related to relevant activities • Qualitative (how well skill is performed) and Quantitative (how far, how many, how fast)

  21. Developing IEP • Have targeted specific activities and know present level of performance → time to formulate long term goals and short term instructional objectives • Figure 5.10 pg. 94

  22. How Do We Teach? • Does the student know the correct components of the skill and just need instruction/feedback? • Knows the components of skill but cannot perform because of motor/sensory impairments? • Most likely needs supplemental instruction and practice

  23. Checking for Understanding • What are two positives of using the Ecological Approach vs. the traditional approach to assessment? • What are the three phases of the ecological assessment model we have discussed so far?

  24. Instructional Modifications • Teaching style • Class formats • How to present material to student • INCLUSION! = Different students need different levels of instruction • Figure 5.12 pg. 96

  25. Communication • How are we going to communicate with student? • Meet with speech therapist • Figure 5.13 pg. 97 • How do the students respond to: • Verbal cues • Gestures • Demonstration • Environmental cues • Physical assistance

  26. Alternate Ways to Perform Skills • Breaking down might not be enough = some students may not be able to perform • Provide alternate ways for students to perform

  27. Curricular Adaptations • Curricular adaption or equipment adaption? • Most students should be given every opportunity to learn skills without modifications or special equipment • Some adaptations can be used temporarily to motivate or assist

  28. Checking for Understanding • Think of an equipment modification one might use in APE. What are possible positive and negative effects on the individual from using modified equip?

  29. Where Do We Teach It? • Decisions based on skills that are needed in present and future environments • How well student performs in GPE? • What skills can be done independently • What skills need assistance • What skills need modifications

  30. Who Will Teach It? • How much support is needed? Who will provide this support? • May perform fine in GPE • Some may need support from: peers, volunteers, TA's, specialists. • Important to have PE teacher and peers who have knowledge about student being included and ways to include • Most cases: peer tutors/volunteers for minor disabilities; specialists for more severe • Specialist can train peers

  31. Evaluating the Program • Critical to determining if student is making progress towards his/her targeted goals • Ongoing evaluation discovers problems • If not conducted at all or just at end of unit, student might be working on skills incorrectly • Can talk to student/parents/peers = perception of program • REEVALUATE Present Level of Performance

  32. Checking for Understanding • What are the six phases of the Ecological Assessment Model? How are they all interrelated? • Which phase do you think will be the most challenging for YOU and why?

  33. Summary • Assessment is a critical aspect of PE, but often is misused. • Ecological Model of assessment provides specific information that is relevant to teaching students with disabilities • Formal assessments should be used whenever a programmatic decision is made to ensure that the student is receiving the most appropriate program possible

  34. Block, M.E. (2006). A teacher's guide to including students with disabilities in general physical education. (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co. • Thank you for your attention and I look forward to answering your questions!

More Related