1 / 42

P13002: Ankle-Foot Orthotic Un-Tethered, Mechanical

P13002: Ankle-Foot Orthotic Un-Tethered, Mechanical. Detailed Design Review. The Team. Team Members: Pattie Schiotis – Team Manager (ME) Shane Reardon – Lead Engineer (ME) Dana Kjolner (EE) Robert Ellsworth (EE) Sam Hosig (CE) John Williams (CE) Faculty Guide: Dr. DeBartolo.

denise
Download Presentation

P13002: Ankle-Foot Orthotic Un-Tethered, Mechanical

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. P13002: Ankle-Foot Orthotic Un-Tethered, Mechanical Detailed Design Review

  2. The Team • Team Members: • Pattie Schiotis – Team Manager (ME) • Shane Reardon – Lead Engineer (ME) • Dana Kjolner (EE) • Robert Ellsworth (EE) • Sam Hosig (CE) • John Williams (CE) • Faculty Guide: Dr. DeBartolo

  3. Agenda • Introduction • Project Background • System Architecture • Locking Mechanism • Power Characterization • Sensor Characterization • Microcontroller/ Coding Progress • Component Testing • Bill of Materials • Budget Breakdown • Updated Risk Assessment

  4. Project Background • Lasting side effect of a stroke: foot drop • Inability to dorsiflex the foot • Ankle Foot Orthotics (AFOs) currently used to aid dorsi-flexion. • Passive devices don’t allow for movement when walking on ramps and stairs • Foot is always pointed upwards

  5. Assumptions & Constraints • User will have no ability to either plantar-flex or dorsi-flex their foot • Side to side stability of the foot will be ignored • Worst case will be analyzed: • 95 percentile male having heavy foot. • Fast walker – gait cycle less than 1 second. • Device may not use air muscles as an actuation source

  6. Key Customer Needs • Safety • Portable • Lasts all day without charging/refueling • Lightweight • Tolerable to wear all day • Reliable • Accommodates Flat Terrain • Accommodates Special Terrain • Stairs • Ramps • Obstacles • Comfortable • Aesthetically Pleasing • Durable • Water Resistant • Corrosion Resistant • Salt & Environment • Biocompatibility • Convenient • Easy to put on and take off Primary Needs: Secondary Needs:

  7. Key Engineering Specifications

  8. Walking Patterns Characterizations used for calculations • Average # of steps per day: 10,000 • # steps on stairs: 100 • # steps on ramps: 100 • Time for rotation: ~0.6 seconds

  9. System Architecture • CAD model Reservoir Sensors Battery Processor Valve Piston/Cylinder Mounting Bracket

  10. CAD Model: DOF Analysis 3 4 2 1

  11. Locking Mechanism:Selection Matrix

  12. Cylinder Selection • In order to swing foot, joint must apply ~2.75Nm • If locking device is 1.5” (3.81cm) away from joint, • Round up to 9/16” to be safe

  13. Cylinder Benchmarks

  14. Valve Selection Criteria • Capable of 125 Psi • #10-32 or 1/8” NPT threads • Allows max flow rate of 0.6213 in3/s • Cv > 0.013 • Assuming laminar, incompressible flow

  15. Valve Selection • Cv=0.035 • Solenoid Powered • Normally Closed (solenoid opens valve) • 12 or 24 VDC • 1/8” NPT threaded • ~3 ms response time

  16. Locking Mechanism: Stress Calculations • HD Polyethylene • E=125,000 Psi • Yield Strength=4,600

  17. Locking Mechanism: Stress Calculations Stress at Bolt Locations: 2000 Psi Stress at Joint: 5000 Psi

  18. Locking Mechanism: Stress Calculations 1.67” F M F=17 lbf M=22.695 in-lb

  19. Locking Mechanism: Stress Calculations Stress at Piston Connection: 1250 Psi Stress at Joint: 1500 Psi

  20. Locking Mechanism:Component Breakdown • What we plan on buying: • Piston/Cylinder • Valve • Fluid Reservoir, 0.72 in3 • Pivot bracket to mount cylinder to top of AFO • What we need to make • Bracket to mount piston to bottom of AFO

  21. Power Calculations

  22. Battery Selection

  23. Circuit Design

  24. Sensor Characterization • Measure the output when compared to a known distance. • Yardstick or tape measure required. • Initial comparisons indicate strong correlation between expected and measured characterization curves. • Short range IR sensor: 10-80 cm (4-31 in) • Long range IR sensor: 20-150 cm (8-59 in)

  25. Calibration with Paper

  26. Calibration with Paper

  27. Multiple Surface Testing

  28. Multiple Surface Testing

  29. Placement of the Sensors: Top 31.63 in 10.25 in 30 in

  30. Placement of the Sensors: Bottom Lower Sensor Heel Strike: ~15 cm (5.9 in) Lift-Off: >~15 cm (5.9 in) Tolerance: +/- 2 cm (.79 in) Angle of Lower Sensor: ~20° from vertical 15 cm

  31. Coding Progress • Functions written for determining upcoming terrain based on sensor readings • Function written to read sensor values • Working on what needs to be written for SD card • Working on function calculation for gait cycle time

  32. System UML

  33. Microcontroller Selection • Price: $5 for each model • TI-MSP430G2553 • Stellaris • Memory capability • MSP430 16KB flash memory • Stellaris 256KB flash memory • Speed • MSP430 16 MHz • Stellaris80 MHz • No need to create separate PCB • Ability to connect SD card for writing out data Currently using 2 MSP430 For final assembly: will be using 1 Stellaris *If not enough memory, will add 1 MSP430 NOTE: Stellaris due to come in mid-December

  34. Component Testing Subsystem/ Function/ Feature Name: Locking Mechanism- Cylinder Owner: Shane/Pattie Subsystem/ Function/ Feature Name: Locking Mechanism- Reservoir Owner: Shane/Pattie Subsystem/ Function/ Feature Name: Locking Mechanism- Valve Owner: Shane/Pattie

  35. Component Testing Subsystem/ Function/ Feature Name: Sensors Owner: John/Dana Subsystem/ Function/ Feature Name: Microcontroller Owner: Sam/John

  36. Component Testing Subsystem/ Function/ Feature Name: Battery/ Electrical components Owner: Rob/Dana Subsystem/ Function/ Feature Name: Orthotic Owner: Shane/Pattie

  37. Bill of Materials/Budget Breakdown • Projected budget usage: $235.49 • Total estimated weight: 0.51 kg

  38. Updated Risk Assessment

  39. Updated Risk Assessment

  40. Updated Risk Assessment

  41. What’s Next

  42. Questions?

More Related