1 / 28

URBP 204A QUANTITATIVE METHODS I Statistical Analysis Lecture III

URBP 204A QUANTITATIVE METHODS I Statistical Analysis Lecture III. Gregory Newmark San Jose State University (This lecture accords with Chapters 9,10, & 11 of Neil Salkind’s Statistics for People who (Think They) Hate Statistics ). Statistical Significance Revisited. Steps:

delfino
Download Presentation

URBP 204A QUANTITATIVE METHODS I Statistical Analysis Lecture III

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. URBP 204A QUANTITATIVE METHODS IStatistical Analysis Lecture III Gregory Newmark San Jose State University (This lecture accords with Chapters 9,10, & 11 of Neil Salkind’s Statistics for People who (Think They) Hate Statistics)

  2. Statistical Significance Revisited Steps: • State hypothesis • Set significance level associated with null hypothesis • Select statistical test (we will learn these soon) • Computation of obtained test statistic value • Computation of critical test statistic value • Comparison of obtained and critical values • If obtained > critical reject the null hypothesis • If obtained < critical stick with the null hypothesis

  3. Three Statistical Tests t-Test for Independent Samples • Tests between the means of two different groups t-Test for Dependent Samples • Tests between the means of two related groups Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) • Tests between means of more than two groups

  4. t-Tests General Points Used for comparing sample means when population’s standard deviation is unknown (which is almost always) Accounts for the number of observations Distribution of t-statistic is identical to normal distribution when sample sizes exceed 120

  5. t-Tests General Points

  6. t-Test of Independent Samples Compares observations of a single variable betweentwo groupsthat are independent Examples: • “Are there differences in TV exposure between teens in Oakland and San Francisco?” • “We are going to take 100 people and give 50 of them $2 and see which group is happier.” • “In 2008, did the average visitor spend less time at the art museum than at the planetarium?” • “Do people in San Jose make different amounts of monthly transit trips than folks in San Francisco?”

  7. t-Test of Independent Samples Example: • “Do people in San Jose make different amounts of monthly transit trips than folks in San Francisco?” Steps: • State hypotheses • Null : H0 : µTrips San Jose = µTripsSan Francisco • Research : H1 : XbarTrips San Jose ≠ XbarTrips San Francisco • Set significance level • Level of risk of Type I Error = 5% • Level of Significance (p) = 0.05

  8. t-Test of Independent Samples Steps (Continued) • Select statistical test • t-Test of Independent Samples • Computation of obtained test statistic value • Insert obtained data into appropriate formula • (SPSS can expedite this step for us)

  9. t-Test of Independent Samples Formula Where • Xbar is the mean • n is the number of participants • s is the standard deviation • Subscripts distinguish between Groups 1 and 2

  10. t-Test of Independent Samples Data San JoseSan Francisco Mean = 5.43 Mean = 5.53 n = 30 n = 30 s = 3.42 s = 2.06

  11. t-Test of Independent Samples Steps (Continued) • Computation of obtained test statistic value • tobtained = -0.14 • (don’t worry about the sign here) • Computation of critical test statistic value • Value needed to reject null hypothesis • Look up p = 0.05 in t table • Consider degrees of freedom [df= n1 + n2 – 2] • Consider number of tails (is there directionality?) • tcritical = 2.001

  12. t-Test of Independent Samples Steps (Continued) • Comparison of obtained and critical values • If obtained > critical reject the null hypothesis • If obtained < critical stick with the null hypothesis • tobtained = |-0.14| < tcritical = 2.001 • Therefore, we cannot reject the null hypothesis and we thus conclude that there are no differences in the mean transit trips per month between people in San Jose and San Francisco

  13. t-Test of Dependent Samples Compares observations of a single variable betweenone groupat two time periods Examples: • “Does watching this movie make audiences feel happier?” • “Does a certain curriculum initiative improve student test results?” • “Do people make more transit trips with the extension of a BART line to their neighborhood?” • “Does sensitivity training make people more sensitive?”

  14. t-Test of Dependent Samples Example: • “Does sensitivity training make people more sensitive?” Steps: • State hypotheses • Null : H0 : µbefore training = µafter training • Research : H1 : Xbarbefore training < Xbarafter training • Set significance level • Level of risk of Type I Error = 5% • Level of Significance (p) = 0.05

  15. t-Test of Dependent Samples Steps: • Select statistical test • t-Test of Dependent Samples • Computation of obtained test statistic value • Insert obtained data into appropriate formula • (SPSS can expedite this step for us)

  16. t-Test of Dependent Samples Formula

  17. t-Test of Dependent Samples

  18. t-Test of Dependent Samples Steps (Continued) • Computation of obtained test statistic value • tobtained = 4.91 • (don’t worry about the sign here) • Computation of critical test statistic value • Value needed to reject null hypothesis • Look up p = 0.05 in t table • Consider degrees of freedom [df = n -1 ] • Consider number of tails (is there directionality?) • tcritical = 1.80

  19. t-Test of Dependent Samples Steps (Continued) • Comparison of obtained and critical values • If obtained > critical reject the null hypothesis • If obtained < critical stick with the null hypothesis • tobtained = |4.91| > tcritical = 1.80 • Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and we thus conclude that the sensitivity training works

  20. Goodbye, t-Tests. Hello, ANOVA.

  21. Simple ANOVA Compares observations of a single variable betweenmultiple groups Examples: • “Are there differences between the reading skills of high school, college, and graduate students?” • “Does environmental knowledge vary between people who commute by car, bus, and walking?” • “Are there wealth differences between A’s, Giants, Dodger, and Angels fans?” • “Are there differences in the speech development among three groups of preschoolers?”

  22. Simple ANOVA Also called One-way ANOVA Compares means of more than two groups on one factor or dimension with F statistic Calculated as a ratio of the amount of variability between groups (due to the grouping factor) to the amount of variability within groups (due to chance) • F = Variability between different Groups Variability within each Group • As this ratio exceeds one it is more likely to be due to something other than chance No directionality, therefore no issue of tails

  23. Simple ANOVA Example: • “Are there differences in the speech development among three groups of preschoolers?” Steps: • State hypotheses • Null : H0 : µgroup 1 = µgroup 2 = µgroup 3 • Research : H1 : Xbargroup 1 ≠ Xbargroup 2 ≠ Xbargroup 3 • Set significance level • Level of risk of Type I Error = 5% • Level of Significance (p) = 0.05

  24. Simple ANOVA Steps: • Select statistical test • Simple ANOVA • Computation of obtained test statistic value • Insert obtained data into appropriate formula • (SPSS can expedite this step for us)

  25. Simple ANOVA Formula

  26. Simple ANOVA Fobtained = 65.31 Degrees of Freedom • Numerator = 2 • Denominator = 27

  27. Simple ANOVA Steps (Continued) • Computation of obtained test statistic value • Fobtained = 65.31 • Computation of critical test statistic value • Value needed to reject null hypothesis • Look up p = 0.05 in F table • Consider degrees of freedom for numerator and denominator • No need to worry about number of tails • Fcritical = 3.36

  28. Simple ANOVA Steps (Continued) • Comparison of obtained and critical values • If obtained > critical reject the null hypothesis • If obtained < critical stick with the null hypothesis • Fobtained = 65.31 > Fcritical = 3.36 • Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and we thus conclude that there are differences in the speech abilities of the students in the preschools.

More Related