1 / 46

Assessment in service learning: Student learning outcomes

Assessment in service learning: Student learning outcomes. Julie A. Hatcher, Exec. Dir. Assoc. Prof. Philanthropic Studies jhatcher@iupui.edu Kristin Norris, ABD norriske@iupui.edu Assessment Director. Center for Civic & Social Responsibility

Download Presentation

Assessment in service learning: Student learning outcomes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Assessment in service learning: Student learning outcomes Julie A. Hatcher, Exec. Dir. Assoc. Prof. Philanthropic Studies jhatcher@iupui.edu Kristin Norris, ABD norriske@iupui.edu Assessment Director Center for Civic & Social Responsibility University of Kansas May 21, 2014

  2. Outcomes for work/play shop • Basic intro to assessment (of x, y, z) • Implications of a “public work” approach at KU • IUPUI “case study” • CMG • NSSE • Identify 1-2 AAC&U learning outcomes for either • Course • Program • Campus • Identify next steps you will take on your assessment matrix

  3. Current Support for “Civic” • Membership Organizations • AAC&U • AASC&U • American Academy of Arts and Sciences • Campus Compact • Imagining America • NASPA • Foundations • Bonner Foundation • Carnegie Foundation: Elective Classification for C.E • Kettering Foundation • Lang Foundation • Lilly Endowment • Lumina Foundation • Teagle Foundation • John Templeton Foundation • Government • State Commissions of Higher Education • Massachusetts Board of Higher Education

  4. Rigor in Research (Assessment) • Rigorous thinking • Hypothesis exploration • Systematic approach • Builds upon prior research • Contributes to the field • Triangulation across inquiry • Information synthesis • Creates useful, relevant knowledge (Patton, 2012)

  5. Schoen’s Reflective Practice • Trait of a good professional • Reflection-in-action • Attentive to new knowledge • Test, adjust, reframe their models of practice • Revise plans

  6. Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle Concrete Experience Active Experimentation Reflective Observation Abstract Conceptualization

  7. Reflective SL Practitioner Practice SL Course/Program/ Curriculum Design Formative Assessment Reflection Activities Classroom Assessment Implications for you/others Program/Course Redesign Theory Research/SoTL

  8. My Reflective Observations • Wine or peanut M&Ms • Important to identify a “north star” • Takes a significant amount of time • Year of Assessment in 1997 ish • Highly connected to scholarship • We find our way by walking… • 3 semesters until “in the saddle” • Refine, improve reflection strategies • Ongoing improvement of processes • Tweaks

  9. Boyte’s concept of Public Work • Places public work (not deliberation or social justice) at the center of democracy • Common pool resources (Ostrom School) • Collective action – “we” not “they” • Lay participation is essential • Trait of a democratic professional (Dzur) • Conflict is intrinsic and healthy aspect • Co-generators of knowledge -- partners

  10. Assessment as Public Work • Portland State case study -- resources • Assessing service-learning and civic engagement: Principles and techniques • AAC&U – VALUE rubric case study • 16 rubrics; all available free • No need to reinvent the wheel • IUPUI case study

  11. Current Context at KU • Reflect – pair & share – wagon wheel • What are the key “pressures” or levers that are motivating you personally to be here today? • What do you hope to do, improve, advance as a result of being here today? • Who do you need to bring to the table so this is done collectively?

  12. Terms of Scholarship -- data • Assessment (What occurred?) • Formative – during the course/program • Summative – end of the course/program • Program Evaluation (What aspect?) • Program Evaluation Research • Research (Why? What conditions?) • Qualitative • Quantitative • Mixed-methods

  13. Definition Service learning is a course-based, credit-bearing educational experience* in which students a) participate in an organized service activity that meets identified community needs*, and b) reflect on the service activity in such a way as to gain • further understanding of course content, • a broader appreciation of the discipline, and • an enhanced sense of personal values* and civic responsibility. • (Bringle & Hatcher, 1995)

  14. Formative Assessment in SL • Classroom Assessment Techniques (Angelo & Cross, 1995) • Exit Cards • Minute Papers • Mid-semester evaluation • Reflection activities • Pair and Share • Journals - various types (DEAL model) • Value of informal/unstructured • Community partner feedback • Coffee……and conversation

  15. Summative Assessment -- Data • Course-based • Grades • End-of-Course survey; pre/post • Products • Curriculum-based • E-portfolio • Digital stories • Exit survey for majors • University-based • Counting; classifying • Longitudinal impact on students • Evidence of community impact

  16. Assessment in SL Course • Are grades sufficient? (perhaps) • What literature review could help to “ground” the assessment? (ex. Nutrition, Architecture) • How can you use/analyze reflection activities as a source of data to document student learning? • What pre/post learning could you assess? • What other products could you gather? • Multiple sources of data -- triangulation

  17. Designing and Assessing SLClass/Program Learning Objectives of Course - Curriculum - Campus Assessment of StudentLearning and Products Scholarship of Teaching/Learning SOTL Selection of Community Partner and Service Experience Structured Reflection Activities Framed by LearningObjectives Products are Created

  18. Service Learning Outcomes • Academic Development • Persistence and retention • Achievement and aspirations • Life Skills • Racial tolerance • Cultural understanding • Civic Responsibility • Commitment to community • Aspirations to volunteer (Sax & Astin, 1997; UCLA/HERI) (www.compact.org/resource/aag.pdf)

  19. Meta-Analyses of SL • Requires a body of research • Psychology, business, communications • Academic • Personal • Social • Citizenship

  20. Case Study from IUPUI • Institutional culture and commitment • Assessment & Civic Engagement • Assessment Institute (Oct 21-23., 2014) • Ethos in our work • Bob Bringle’s leadership • Scholarship and research • Signature Center designation • IUPUI Book Series – Research on SL Vol 1, Vol 2 • Boyer Scholars Faculty Learning Community • IUPUI Research Academy (each May)

  21. Types of CitizenshipAcross Disciplines • Civic professionalism • Social responsibility • Social justice • Connected knowing: Ethic of care • Public leadership • Public intellectual • Engaged/public scholarship (Battistoni, 2002)

  22. Civic-Minded Graduates • “to what end? ” • Civic-Minded Professionals • John Dewey • Democracy and Education • William Sullivan • Habits of the Heart • Work and Integrity • Ernest Boyer • “public good” argument

  23. CMG as a “North Star” • A civic-minded graduate is one who • is formally educated and • has the capacity and orientation to work with others • in a democratic way • to improve the community. • (Hatcher, 2011)

  24. Civic-Mindedness “a person’s inclination or disposition to be knowledgeable of and involved in the community, and to have a commitment to act upon a sense of responsibility as a member of that community” (Steinberg, Hatcher, Bringle, 2011)

  25. Civic-Minded Graduate Model

  26. Civic and Workforce Development • Developing civic-minded graduates and professionals • Developing workforce “soft” skills • Recognizing the importance of place (Battistoni & Longo, 2012)

  27. Domains of CMG: Civic Knowledge • More than purely academic knowledge(dates, places, important civic or political events) • Knowledge of volunteer opportunities(ways to contribute to society and of nonprofit organizations) • Knowledge of contemporary social issues (current events and the complexity of issues in modern society) (Steinberg, Bringle, & Hatcher 2011)

  28. Domains of CMG: Civic Skills • Communication and Listening(ability to communicate with others and listen to divergent points of view) • Diversity (understanding the importance of, and the ability to work with others from diverse backgrounds) • Consensus-building(ability to work across difference to come to an agreement or solve a problem)

  29. Domains of CMG: Civic Dispositions • Valuing community engagement (understanding the importance of service to others, and being actively involved in the community) • Self-efficacy (have the desire to take personal action, with a realistic view that the action will produce the desired result) • Social trustee of knowledge (feeling a sense of responsibility and commitment to use the knowledge gained in college to serve others)

  30. CMG Survey • 30 Likert-type items (student self-report) • Knowledge, skills, dispositions, behaviors • 6-point response format • Demographic items • Student activity items • Paper or online administration • Adaptable: “My education at IUPUI” – course, or major, depends on the research question

  31. Assessment Tools • Course Evaluation • SL End –of-Course Survey • Domains to include for your campus? • Student Learning Outcomes • Civic-Minded Graduate Scale • Civic-Minded Graduate Narrative • Civic-Minded Graduate Rubric • AAC&U VALUE Rubric (Civic Engagement)

  32. Implications of CMG--CMP • Program Design • Alternative Break; days of service • Service-scholarship Applications • Plater Medallion • Consultations with faculty and departments • New work in faculty development and graduate education

  33. Pair and Share • Put on your “disciplinary hat” • Why is it important to you as a…landscapearchitect, student affairs professional…to include civic learning in your course/program? • What type of civic learning do you hope occurs for your students? • Who are your stakeholders, and why would they care about these outcomes?

  34. Learning Objectives • List 2 civic learning objectives in your community engaged program/course. • (How do these align with broader curriculum?) • (How do these align with accountability for external program review, if applicable?) • (How do these align with the campus mission for student learning?)

  35. “Deep Learning” • High Impact Practices (e.g., “HIPs”) • Distinct value of service learning • Additive value of multiple experiences • See AAC&U, Ashley Finley, Director of Research and Assessment • NSSE Data (12 items) • Higher-Order learning • Integrative learning • Reflective learning

  36. Participation in Service Learning Courses The independent variable, participation in serving learning courses, was derived from NSSE survey question 1K: In your experience at your institution during the current school year, about how often have you done each of the following? k. Participated in a community-based project (e.g., service learning) as part of a regular course

  37. Participation in Service Learning Courses

  38. Deep Learning • The dependent variable deep learning was comprised of three different scales. Reliability analysis was conducted for higher-order learning (α=.83), integrative learning (α=.73), and reflective learning (α=.83). • The data file was then split into freshman and senior students so the analysis could be conducted on these two populations separately.

  39. Higher Order Learning Questions (α=.83)

  40. Integrative Learning Questions (α=.73)

  41. Reflective Learning Questions (α=.83)

  42. The Findings • An independent-samples t-test evaluated differences in reported deep learning skills between students who participated in one or more service learning courses and those students who did not participate in service learning courses. • Deep learning skills of higher-order learning, integrative learning, and reflective learning were all higher for both seniors and freshman who participated in service learning course(s).

  43. IUPUI Freshman *p<.05, 2-tailed significance

  44. IUPUI Seniors *p<.05, 2-tailed significance

  45. Implications • Results contribute evidence of student learning at the institution level • Findings are consistent with prior research on participation in service learning and improved student outcome measures (Astin et. al., 2000) • Provide a rationale for institutions to support faculty who engage with the community partners to develop service learning courses

  46. Matrix Framework

More Related