1 / 17

Cooperative IRB Review Arrangements for Multicenter Research: Central IRB Perspective

Agenda. Overview of CRRI IRB Challenges in reviewing pediatric research Potential solutions Questions. 2. . . . . Types of IRBs. Academic Medical Centers Community Hospital Government Agency Associations/Advocacy Groups Independent Central". 3. . . . . Regulations Go

december
Download Presentation

Cooperative IRB Review Arrangements for Multicenter Research: Central IRB Perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Cooperative IRB Review Arrangements for Multicenter Research: Central IRB Perspective 1

    2. Agenda Overview of CRRI IRB Challenges in reviewing pediatric research Potential solutions Questions 2

    3. 3

    4. 4

    8. Reporting Responsibilities 8

    9. 9

    10. 10

    11. Challenges for CRRI IRB in Reviewing Pediatric Research Poor protocol design Determination of “risk” category Therapeutic Misconception Poor site selection/Training Variable execution and implementation/SOP Investigator/Institutional Over-delegation Lack of Institutional “will” Confusion regarding “who’s in charge” Poor patient/public understanding of research 11

    12. Ethical Concerns Conflicts of interests (interest of subject vs. interest of PI/institution) Autonomy (e.g., assent and age of majority) Coercion (e.g., subject recruitment/payment) Privacy/confidentiality (e.g. genetics research) 12

    13. 13

    14. 14

    15. How CRRI Addresses Issues Escalating Review Process Non-binding review Staff review at intake Regulatory review as necessary Designee review (may be binding) Full-board review (multiple options) Executive/IO Action Staff/IRB training and corrective actions Policy Review/Modification Ongoing QA/AC Activity 15

    16. How CRRI Addresses Issues AAHRPP Accreditation Standardized/Documented Approach Implementation of new technology “smart form” Assume collaborative responsibility/authority Workflow processes for institutional partners “shared responsibilities for HRP” 16

    17. The Partnership for Human Subject Protection 17

    18. 18

More Related