1 / 6

Evaluation Criteria

Evaluation Criteria. Phase 1: Real-time Cognitive State Detection Cognitive State shift detection < 1minute Performance X3 baseline w/ two interruption sources 100% memory increase Phase 2: Real-time Cognitive State Manipulation 50% improvement in silicon performance

davis
Download Presentation

Evaluation Criteria

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluation Criteria • Phase 1: Real-time Cognitive State Detection • Cognitive State shift detection < 1minute • Performance X3 baseline w/ two interruption sources • 100% memory increase • Phase 2: Real-time Cognitive State Manipulation • 50% improvement in silicon performance • 100% improvement in agent-augmented human performance while executing three to five competing tasks • Phase 3: Autonomous Cognitive State Manipulation • 10% (or less) degradation in task performance under stress (baseline Phase 2). • No catastrophic failures • Phase 4: Operational Demonstration and Transition

  2. How? • Measure cognitive load and capacity. • Brain imaging (e.g. fMRI) • External head monitoring (e.g. EEG) • Body sensing (e.g. Arousal) • Eye measures (e.g. Pupilary response) • Exploit human sensory channels. • Optimize information allocation. Phased Approach

  3. High Level Goals

  4. Initial Program Phases TASKS Case 1: Enhanced Performance in Flight Sim Cockpit Demonstrate 30% performance increase over today’s baseline when 3 major tasks compete for attention Context track effects of interrupt • Individual can improve silicon performance by 50% • Agents can Augment Human Performance by 100% • when 3-5 major tasks are competing for attention • Use silicon to augment the Human at a distance • Representation synchronize/context track/cognition on task Case 2: Enhanced Performance in InfoCockpit Demonstrate a 100% improvement in memory • Measure Cognitive Load • Measure Cognitive Capacity Cognitive Workload Assessor • Trade-off channel use to exploit cognitive capacity • Off-load appropriate tasks to silicon • Synchronize representation and context to provide a bridge for augmentation Systems Interface Director • Multiple tasks with interruption; • No degradation in performance • Enable multi-context tracking • Synchronize adaptive automation Techbase for Attention to Offset interruption “Brain on task” Single task with interruption; 30% performance improvement over baseline FY02 FY03 FY04 Phase 1 Phase 2

  5. Tasks and Initial Performers TASKS Case 1: Enhanced Performance in Flight Sim Cockpit rformance aseline when pete for attention fects of interrupt Demonstrate 30% performance increase over today’s baseline when 3 major tasks compete for attention Context track effects of interrupt • Individual can improve silicon performance by 50% • Agents can Augment Human Performance by 100% • when 3-5 major tasks are competing for attention • Use silicon to augment the Human at a distance • Representation synchronize/context track/cognition on task Case 2: Enhanced Performance in InfoCockpit CMU - UVA – CSU • Sandia NL - Notre Dame - Illinois - AFRL • Sarnoff-UNM-UCSD-Princeton-Colombia • Clemson - NovaSol - SDSU – Hawaii USAFA • QinetiQ - Bristol U - Epistemics - UWF • DaimlerChrysler -Albrt EinsteinCM -BMH Cognitive Workload Assessor • Trade-off channel use to exploit cognitive capacity • Off-load appropriate tasks to silicon • Synchronize representation and context to provide a bridge for augmentation Systems Interface Director • Multiple tasks with interruption; • No degradation in performance • Enable multi-context tracking • Synchronize adaptive automation Techbase for Attention to Offset interruption “Brain on task” MIT - LockMartATL – CNRI Maya Viz - OGI FY02 FY03 FY04 Phase 1 Phase 2

  6. Metrics for Success

More Related