1 / 14

Direct Democracy in Belgium

Direct Democracy in Belgium. obstacles, practices and prospects - Michaël Bauwens - Democratie.Nu | www.democratie.nu. Content. about Belgium DD in Belgium - or the lack of it political and legal problems with DD semi-DD procedures prospects and plans. population.

davida
Download Presentation

Direct Democracy in Belgium

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Direct Democracy in Belgium • obstacles, practices and prospects • - • Michaël Bauwens • - • Democratie.Nu | www.democratie.nu

  2. Content • about Belgium • DD in Belgium - or the lack of it • political and legal problems with DD • semi-DD procedures • prospects and plans

  3. population 10,396,421 (57%D, 43%F) surface 30,528 km2 federal capital Brussels head of state King Albert II prime minister Guy Verhofstadt political structure federal country official languages Dutch, French and German Belgium

  4. political map of Belgium

  5. DD in Belgium • DD : binding popular votes • No DD on the federal level • No DD on the regional level (communities and regions) • No DD on the local level (provinces and communes)

  6. Political obstacles • Political majority in favor of DD • Flanders/Wallonia : Walloonian socialists fear DD will lead to problems • 1950 plebiscite on the “royal question” • usual fear of politicians for DD

  7. Legal problems • Constitution: “Art. 33 All power emanates from the Nation. This power is exerted in the manner established by the Constitution.” • “Nation” considered to be past, present and future generations of Belgians • State Council: ‘Representative system is not compatible with direct-democratic procedures.’

  8. semi-DD procedures • Constitution: “Art. 28 Everyone has the right to address petitions signed by one or more persons to the public authorities. [...]” • petition, not an Agenda Initiative • very weak agenda-setting instrument

  9. Regional level: Flanders • “Verzoekschrift”= petition • Chairman of parliament decides what happens to the petition • If signed by 15.000 people, parliament is forced to ‘investigate’ the petition, but without the obligation to put the proposal to a vote • ‘First undersigned’ can be heard in parliament

  10. Local level : “Volksraadpleging” 1 • Non-binding, consultative popular vote • triggered by authorities or citizens • signature treshold : 20% of inhabitants for communes<15.000 people, 3.000 sgn. for 15.000<communes<30.000 people, 10% of inhabitants for communes>30.000 people • participation quorum = signature treshold

  11. “Volksraadpleging” 2 • excluded issues (finances, persons, ...) • authorities decide about the question • very bad experiences with authorities changing the question, not counting votes, ignoring result, ...

  12. Local level Flanders: real citizens’ initiative • almost certain (approved by gov. but not yet by parliament) • signature tresholds: 2% of inhabitants (16yr) for communes<15.000 people, 300 sgn. for 15.000<communes<30.000 people, 1% of inhabitants for communes>30.000 people • right to be heard • local authorities have to take a position on the question

  13. What to do about it? • ‘WIT for direct democracy’ established in 1995, focus on lobbying • change of name, logo, website and strategy in 2005 • “We don’t live in a democracy, we live in a particracy” • 5 gangsters and your wallet

  14. ... thanks for your attention • michael.bauwens@democratie.nu • www.democratie.nu

More Related