1 / 14

Couple therapy for depression –effectiveness monitoring

Couple therapy for depression –effectiveness monitoring. Main questions: Do we see improvement in client scores on depression and anxiety? Do we see improvement in clients’ relationship satisfaction? Is improvement in relationship important for recovery from depression and anxiety?. Data.

darlenef
Download Presentation

Couple therapy for depression –effectiveness monitoring

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Couple therapy for depression –effectiveness monitoring

  2. Main questions: • Do we see improvement in client scores on depression and anxiety? • Do we see improvement in clients’ relationship satisfaction? • Is improvement in relationship important for recovery from depression and anxiety?

  3. Data • 53 therapists were asked to provide the data about their clients’ scores on measures of depression, anxiety and couple satisfaction at intake, session 4 and end of therapy • N=37 therapists provided usable data (i.e., data including at least intake and the end-therapy scores). • In total the sample used for the analysis included the data from n=218 clients. • Average number of sessions: 16.86 (max=25, /min=3)

  4. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) Scoring: • 5-9 some mild depression; • 10-14 moderate depression; • 15-19 moderately severe; • 20-27 severe • Caseness: 10 or above

  5. Total sample

  6. Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD7) Scoring: • 0-4 normal; • 5-9 mild anxiety; • 10-14 moderate; • 15-21 severe • -IAPT-high Intensity uses score 8 and above as an indication of caseness

  7. Total sample

  8. Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI-32) • Min-0 / Max-180; Higher scores denote higher relationship satisfaction • Distressed relationships cutoff: below 104.5

  9. Total sample

  10. Recovery rate Depression: • At intake 61.4% of clients had depression scores within the clinical range; out of those (n=127) who were in the clinical range at intake, 73.2% recovered at the end of therapy. Anxiety: • At intake 62.3% of clients had anxiety scores within the clinical range; out of those (n=137) who were in the clinical range at intake, 75.1% recovered at the end of therapy. Depression & Anxiety (IAPT criterion): • Out of n=201 clients who had data at intake and end of therapy for both measures n=96 (47.76%) reported recovery for both – depression and anxiety.

  11. Does improvement in relationship satisfaction predict recovery?

  12. Conclusions • There is evidence for statistically significant improvement in clients depression, anxiety and relationship satisfaction • There is evidence that the improvement in relationship satisfaction predicted recovery

More Related