1 / 9

Enhancing Health Development Effectiveness Monitoring: Progress & Key Issues

Learn about the 2014 round of monitoring effectiveness in health development, including key differences from 2012, participant countries, data collation, and mutual accountability. Explore tools, progress, challenges, and discussion points for improving dissemination and data utilization.

sondra
Download Presentation

Enhancing Health Development Effectiveness Monitoring: Progress & Key Issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2014 Round of Monitoring Development Effectiveness in Health Progress & key issues 20 June 2014

  2. Reminder: what makes the 2014 monitoring round different from the 2012 round? • DPs reportat country level to promote country ownership ….. => More likely that data are used locally & mutual accountability is strengthened • Reduced transaction costs – fewer indicators, exploring publicly available data sources …. But? • Data collation (existing data and existing modalities); => global reporting to align with country cycles • Framework combines IHP+ and GPEDC indicators. => working closely with OECD to build on experience in GPEDC monitoring (2013)

  3. What is being monitored? • Six issues asagreed by IHP+ signatories: • Health development cooperation is focused on results • Health development cooperation is more predictable • Health aid is on budget • Civil society is engaged • Mutual accountability is strengthened • PFM systems are strengthened and used

  4. Which countries participate? 25 IHP+ partner countries, including Cambodia

  5. Which DPs participate? • No complete picture yet on which DPs are participating • But in each country MoH has made contact with the DPs / stakeholders (or planned to do so) • Partial information suggests a range from 5 to 14 DPs per country • Some countries include NGOs (if providing funds to the sector)

  6. Data collation & country support • Tools developed & shared with all countries • Most countries have started data collation • Overall good progress but slower in 10 countries • DRC, Mali and Sierra Leone have opted to be ‘focus countries’ with more intense support over next 6 months, beyond just data collation • Challenge: timeframe to be adapted

  7. Process & new timeline

  8. Other products • Mutual accountability options paper • Toolbox • Data collation tools & guidance papers • Score cards • Webpage / website • Other (e.g. briefing papers to promote use)

  9. Some points for discussion • How to facilitate effective dissemination of results and use of data, within countries and in agencies? • The more country-based approach being taken this time is new. But early signs are that these are steps in the right direction. Any feedback on the process? • Any other point for discussion?

More Related