1 / 22

Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction for Northward Interplanetary Magnetic Field

Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction for Northward Interplanetary Magnetic Field. LLBL formation Global model Summary. Paul Song Center for Atmospheric Research University of Massachusetts Lowell. Acknowledgments: C. T. Russell, T.I. Gombosi, D.L. DeZeeuw. Structure of the Magnetopause.

dante
Download Presentation

Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction for Northward Interplanetary Magnetic Field

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction for Northward Interplanetary Magnetic Field • LLBL formation • Global model • Summary Paul Song Center for Atmospheric Research University of Massachusetts Lowell Acknowledgments: C. T. Russell, T.I. Gombosi, D.L. DeZeeuw

  2. Structure of the Magnetopause Northward IMF Southward IMF

  3. Distribution Functions Across the Magnetopause

  4. Summary of LLBL Observationsfor Northward IMF Density and temperature change in steps: against diffusion to be important Indication of mixtures of plasmas of magnetosphere and magnetosheath origins at different ratios Thicker and faster on the nightside Smaller density gradient and velocity shear on the nightside

  5. Northward IMF[Dungey, 1963] Southward IMF[Dungey, 1961]

  6. Song and Russell Model [1992] Reconnection takes place on the stagnant field line at regions of high field shear

  7. After Cusp Reconnection • As Alfvenic kink propagates to lower latitudes, the newly reconnected field line “sinks” into the magnetosphere • Note the foot of the field moves sunward

  8. NBZ Model • Entry Mechanism • Through reconnection at two hemispheres the magnetosphere captures a segment of a solar wind flux tube • The newly captured flux tube sinks into the magnetosphere via propagating Alfven waves.

  9. Formation of the LLBL • After the captured flux tube becomes a magnetospheric flux tube • The original flux tube is compressed and shortened (magnetic volume decreases =>B and increases) • Total pressure of the flux tube increases. • The flux tube expands (increase in length or volume) along the magnetopause to the flank via interchange instability • Ionospheric dissipation drags the motion • Successive reconnection events form multiple layers of LLBL • Interpenetration and mixing of plasmas of two origins result in decreased ratio of magnetosheath-to-magnetosphere population: an aging process How can the flux tube flow back?

  10. Global Modeling the Solar Wing-Magnetosphere-Ionosphere System • The topological status of the magnetosphere: open or closed? • Driver(s) of ionospheric sunward flow • Source(s) of NBZ currents • Key problem: are “viscous cells” driven by viscosity? Challenges

  11. Ionospheric Observations for NBZ Field-aligned current Precipitation particles [Ijima and Potemra, 1978] [Newell and Meng, 1994]

  12. Ionospheric Convection and Field Perturbations for NBZ [Potemra et al., 1984]

  13. Ogino’s code, NBZ, [Ogino and Walker, 1984] • Cusp reconnection • Closed magnetosphere

  14. Rice Model, NBZ [Usadi et al., 1993] • Cusp merging • Closed magnetosphere • Shorter tail for large IMF magnitude

  15. Fedder and Lyon (1995), NBZ MHD Simulation Noon-midnight meridian • Cusp merging • Closed magnetosphere • 4-cell ionosphere convection • NBZ currents • Flow diversion at 95 Re Equatorial Plane

  16. Raeder’s Model, NBZ [Raeder et al., 1995] • Cusp reconnection • Tail reconnection • Open tail • No ionospheric convection is shown

  17. Ogino’s code, NBZ, [Bargatze et al., 1999] • Cusp reconnection • Closed magnetosphere

  18. Global MHD Simulation For Northward IMF Reconnection Tail Tail-length Ionosphere Ogino-Walker cusp closed ~1/B Wu cusp closed ~ 1/B Usadi et al. cusp closed ~ 1/B Fedder-Lyon cusp closed ~1/B 4-cell/NBZ Raeder cusp+tail open Michigan cusp closed ~ 1/B 4-cell/NBZ Bargatze cusp closed ~ 1/B 4-cell/NBZ ISM cusp closed 4-cell/NBZ

  19. Raeder’s Model, NBZ [Raeder et al., 1995] • Cusp reconnection • Tail reconnection • Open tail • No ionospheric convection is shown

  20. Global Picture • Solar wind and magnetosphere are coupled through high latitude reconnection. • For due NBZ, the magnetosphere is closed except the cusps • Three topological boundaries and regions. • Outer magnetosphere: two convection channels and two cells. • LLBL is driven by pressure gradients. • “Viscous” cells are driven at ionosphere by Pedersen currents. • A region of stagnant flow near midnight in the tail between 20-50 Re depending on the IMF strength: cold-density plasma sheet. • Ionosphere: • 4-cell convection. • NBZ, Region I, and (Region II currents, not modeled). • Polar caps, although closed, see solar wind particles

  21. NBZ MHD Simulation (Michigan Code)

  22. Summary • Chris and I first proposed a model of formation of LLBL for northward IMF • We then collaborated with Michigan group and developed a self-consistent global model for northward IMF: • Solar wind entry: reconnection. • LLBL flow: driven by pressure force. • Magnetotail length: increases with 1/BIMF, NSW, MSW. • Reverse cells: driven by reconnection and LLBL. • “Viscous cells”: driven at ionosphere by Pedersen currents. • Magnetopause definition: the magnetopause currents may differ from the topological boundary. • Stagnation line/point dilemma: No stagnation region in the magnetosheath. A stagnation line occurs in the magnetospheric field. • Ionosphere: Precipitation within (outside) the polar cap is of solar wind (magnetospheric) origin (mistaken by some people as evidence of an open region). • The most important things I learned from Chris: • A positive view toward referees and referee’s reports • There are “only” 3 ways to prove truth! (simulation is NOT among them!) • Can you summarize your thesis in one sentence, or two sentences, or … (an anti- correlation between the number of sentences with the significance of work)

More Related